AdebayoAdedeji, ‘Formulating Administrative Reform Strategies in Africa’, Administration (Institute of Administration Quarterly Journal), Vol. VI, No. 3, April 1972, p. 229.
2.
White Paper on the Second and Final Report of the Wages and Salaries Commission, 1970–71, Federal Ministry of Information, Lagos, 1971.
3.
Public Service Review Commission, Main Report, September 1974, Federal Ministry of Information, Lagos, p. iii.
4.
Public Service Review Commission, Main Report, September 1974, Federal Ministry of Information, Lagos, p. iii.
5.
See GreenHarry A., ‘A Professional Public Service: Some Observations on the Udoji Commission’, (mimeo). Institute of Administration, University of Ife, Ile-Ife.
6.
See TaylorF. W., The Principles of Scientific Management, Harper, New York, 1923; and SpriegelW. R. and MyersC. E. (eds.). The Writings of tha Gilbreths, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Ill., 1963.
7.
Max Weber, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (Trans. A. M. Henderson and T. Parsons), Free Press, Glencoe, Ill., 1947; and J. D. Mooney and A. C. Reily, The Principles of Organization, Harper, New York, 1939.
8.
ArgyrisC., Personality and Organization, Harper, New York, 1957; also by the same author, Integrating the Individual and the Organization, Wiley, New York, 1964; and C. I. Barnard, The Functions of the Executive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1938.
9.
DruckerP. F., The Practice of Management, William Heinemann Ltd., London, 1955, p. 117.
10.
DruckerP. F., The Practice of Management, William Heinemann Ltd., London, 1955, p. 117.
11.
The Civil Service, Vol. 1, Report on the (Fulton) Committee 1966–1968, Cmnd. 3638, HMSO, London, Para. 150.
12.
See MillerE. G., ‘Management by Objectives in Britain’ in Public Administration Review, Vol. XXX, No. 4, July/August 1970; and CharkhamJ. P. and WalkerS. D., Why Mbo?’, O & M Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1970.
13.
Sir Maurice Dean, ‘The Fulton Report: Accountable Management in the Civil Service’, Public Administration, Vol. 47, Spring 1969.
14.
See BalogunM. J., ‘The Crisis of Operational Efficiency in Nigerian Administration’, Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2, July 1974.
15.
Main Report, op. cit., para. 39.
16.
See LitzingerW., MavrinacA. and WagleJ., ‘The Manned Spacecraft Centre in Houston — The Practice of Matrix Management’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. XXXVI, No. 1, 1970.
17.
Main Report, op. cit., para. 34, and Litzinger, op. cit., p. 4.
18.
Main Report, op. cit., para. 37. Litzinger (p. 4) define the ‘programme organization’ as a “general management activity aimed at integrating the planning, controlling, supervision, engineering, and manufacturing activities involved in producing the end item”.
19.
Litzinger, Main Report, op. cit., para. 37. Litzinger (p. 4) define the ‘programme organization’ as a “general management activity aimed at integrating the planning, controlling, supervision, engineering, and manufacturing activities involved in producing the end item”., p. 4.
20.
For a distinction between ‘technical’ and ‘economic’ efficiency, see BalogunM. J., ‘A Framework for the Measurement of Governmental Efficiency’, Administration, Vol. VII, No. 1, October 1972.
21.
Main Report, op. cit., para. 40.
22.
Main Report, op. cit., para. 48.
23.
Quoted in BotnerS. B., Four Years of PPBS: An Appraisal’, Public Administration Review, Vol. XXX, No. 4, July/August 1970.