By drawing on the social exchange theory, the paper proposes a moderated mediation model to examine the influence of trust in leadership and bottom-up learning on the relationship between inclusive leadership and employee change participation. The research was conducted during the second wave (August 2020 to February 2021) of the COVID-19 pandemic concurrently in Paris (France) and Athens (Greece). Participants were employees and their supervisors from a multinational ICT company. The research findings suggest that in both countries, trust in leadership mediates the positive relationship between inclusive leadership and employees’ change participation. In contrast, they failed to provide support for the potential moderating role of bottom-up learning. The results indicate that should leaders and change management practitioners manage to influence positively employees’ trust in leadership by employing inclusive practices and procedures, they will enhance their level of participation during change.
AgoteLAramburuNLinesR (2016) Authentic leadership perception, trust in the leader, and followers’ emotions in organizational change processes. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science52(1): 35–63.
AlaviSBGillC (2017) Leading change authentically: how authentic leaders influence follower responses to complex change. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies24(2): 157–171.
4.
AlexievASJansenJJPVan den BoschFAJ, et al. (2010) Top management team advice seeking and exploratory innovation: the moderating role of TMT heterogeneity. Journal of Management Studies47(7): 1343–1364.
5.
AntoniC (2004) A motivational perspective on change process and outcomes. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology13(2): 197–216.
6.
BlauPM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
7.
BooysenL (2014) The development of inclusive leadership practice and processes. In: FerdmanBMDeaneBR (eds) Diversity at Work: The Practice of Inclusion. New York: Wiley, 296–329.
BrocknerJKonovskyMCooper-SchneiderR, et al. (1994) Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal37(2): 397–409.
11.
BrocknerJSiegelPADalyJP, et al. (1997) When trust matters: the moderating effect of outcome favorability. Administrative Science Quarterly42(3): 558–583.
12.
BrownMCreganC (2008) Organizational change cynicism: the role of employee involvement. Human Resource Management47(8): 667–686.
13.
ByunGDaiYLeeS, et al. (2017) Leader trust, competence, LMX, and member performance: a moderated mediation framework. Psychological Reports120(6): 1137–1159.
14.
CarmeliAReiter-PalmonRZivE (2010) Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: the mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal22(3): 250–260.
15.
CarnevaleJBHuangLCredeM, et al. (2017) Leading to stimulate employees' ideas: a quantitative review of leader–member exchange, employee voice, creativity, and innovative behavior. Applied Psychology66(4): 517–552.
16.
CashmanK (1998) Change mastery: leading the row. Executive Excellence15(1): 12.
17.
ChoiSBTranTBHKangS-W (2017) Inclusive leadership and employee well-being: the mediating role of person-job fit. Journal of Happiness Studies18(6): 1877–1901.
18.
DeschampsCRinfretNLagacéMC, et al. (2016) Transformational leadership and change: how leaders influence their followers’ motivation through organizational justice. Journal of Healthcare Management/American College of Healthcare Executives61(3): 194–213.
19.
EdwardsJRLambertLS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytic framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods12(1): 1–22.
20.
ErridaALotfiB (2021) The determinants of organizational change management success: literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management13: 184797902110162.
21.
FarmaneshPZargarP (2021) Trust in leader as a psychological factor on employee and organizational outcome.
22.
FrankeRHKaulJD (1978) The Hawthorne experiments: first statistical interpretation. American Sociological Review43(5): 623–643.
23.
FuchsSProuskaR (2014) Creating positive employee change evaluation: the role of different levels of organizational support and change participation. Journal of Change Management14(3): 361–383.
24.
GarbaOABabalolaMTLiangG (2017) A social exchange perspective on why and when ethical leadership fosters customer-oriented citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management70(3): 1–8.
25.
GilbertCG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal48(5): 741–763. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159695
26.
HairJF (2011) Multivariate data analysis: an overview. In: International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Berlin: Springer, 904–907.
27.
HeydenMFournéSKoeneB, et al. (2016) Rethinking ‘top‐down’ and ‘bottom‐up’ roles of top and middle managers in organizational change: implications for employee support. Journal of Management Studies54(7): 961–985.
28.
HidegIMichelaJLFerrisDL (2011) Overcoming negative reactions of nonbeneficiaries to employment equity: the effect of participation in policy formulation. Journal of Applied Psychology96(2): 363–376.
29.
HiggsMJRowlandD (2000) Building change leadership capability: ‘The quest for change competence. Journal of Change Management1(2): 116–131.
30.
HirakRPengACCarmeliA, et al. (2012) Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: the importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. The Leadership Quarterly23(1): 107–117.
HollanderEP (2009) Inclusive Leadership: The Essential Leader-Follower Relationship. New York: Routledge.
33.
HoltDTArmenakisAAFieldHS, et al. (2007) Readiness for organizational change: the systematic development of a scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science43(2): 232–255.
34.
IacobucciD (2010) Structural equations modeling: fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology20(1): 90–98.
35.
InglehartRWelzelC (2022) The inglehart-welzel World cultural Map - World values survey 7. Available at: https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/
36.
KatsarosKK (2022) Exploring the inclusive leadership and employee change participation relationship: the role of workplace belongingness and meaning-making. Baltic Journal of Management17(2): 158–173.
37.
KatsarosKK (2024) Gen Z employee adaptive performance: the role of inclusive leadership and workplace happiness. Administrative Sciences14(8): 163.
38.
KatsarosKK (2025) Gen Z employees’ adaptive performance in hybrid workplaces: the role of inclusive leadership, creativity, and work engagement. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science16: 1520210.
39.
KatsarosKK (2025b) Gen Z tourism employees’ adaptive performance during a major cultural shift: the impact of leadership and employee voice behavior. Behavioral Sciences15(2): 171.
40.
KatsarosKKTsirikasAN (2022) Perceived change uncertainty and behavioral change support: the role of positive change orientation. Journal of Organizational Change Management35(3): 511–526.
41.
KatsarosKKTsirikasA (2023) Exploring behavioral change support: the role of perceived uncertainty and self- and other-interest in change. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal44(4): 503–519.
42.
KatsarosKKTsirikasAKostaG (2020) The impact of leadership on firm financial performance: the mediating role of employees’ readiness to change. The Leadership & Organization Development Journal41(3): 333–347.
43.
KimJNRheeY (2011) Strategic thinking about employee communication behavior (ECB) in public relations: Testing the models of megaphoning and scouting effects in Korea. Journal of Public Relations Research23(3): 243–268.
44.
KoffmanJGrossJEtkindSN, et al. (2020) Uncertainty and COVID-19: how are we to respond?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine113(6): 211–216.
45.
KotterJP (1996) Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review73(2): 59–67.
46.
LePBLeiH (2018) The mediating role of trust in stimulating the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing processes. Journal of Knowledge Management22(3): 521–537.
47.
LiMLiuWHanY, et al. (2016) Linking empowering leadership and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: the role of thriving at work and autonomy orientation. Journal of Organizational Change Management29(5): 732–750.
48.
LiJYSunRTaoW, et al. (2021) Employee coping with organizational change in the face of a pandemic: the role of transparent internal communication. Public Relations Review47(1): 101984.
49.
LiggansGAttohPAGongT, et al. (2019) Military veterans in federal agencies: organizational inclusion, human resource practices, and trust in leadership as predictors of organizational commitment. Public Personnel Management48(3): 413–437.
50.
LinesRSelartM (2013) Participation and organizational commitment during change: from utopist to realist perspectives. In: LeonardHSLewisRFreedmanAM, et al. (eds) The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Leadership, Change and Organizational Development. West Sussex: Wiley, 289–311.
51.
LinhNTN (2024) The Influence of establishing a happy workplace environment on attracting Generation Z. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice30(5): 2482–2488.
52.
MacCallumRABrowneMWSugawaraH (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods1(2): 130–149.
53.
MadisonKEvaNGohZ, et al. (2023) Excluded from exchange: how social exchange theory privileges men leaders. Academy of Management Proceedings2023(1): 16088.
54.
Marques-QuinteiroPVargasREiflerN, et al. (2019) Employee adaptive performance and job satisfaction during organizational crisis: the role of self-leadership. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology28(1): 85–100.
55.
MenLRYueCALiuY (2020) Vision, passion, and care: the impact of charismatic executive leadership communication on employee trust and support for organizational change. Public Relations Review46(3): 101927.
56.
MitchellMSVogelRMFolgerR (2015) Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers. Journal of Applied Psychology100(4): 1040–1055.
57.
MomTJMVan Den BoschFAJVolberdaHW (2007) Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: the influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies44(6): 911–931.
58.
MorganDEZeffaneR (2003) Employee involvement, organizational change and trust in management. International Journal of Human Resource Management14(1): 55–75.
59.
MullinAECoeIRGoodenEA, et al. (2021) Inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility: from organizational responsibility to leadership competency. Healthcare Management Forum34(6): 311–315.
60.
NembhardIMEdmondsonAC (2006) Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in healthcare teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior27(7): 941–966.
61.
OregSBersonY (2019) Leaders’ impact on organizational change: bridging theoretical and methodological chasms. The Academy of Management Annals13(1): 272–307.
62.
OregSVakolaMArmenakisA (2011) Change recipients' reactions to organizational change: a 60-year review of quantitative studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science47(4): 461–524.
63.
OregSBartunekJMLeeG, et al. (2018) An affect-based model of recipients’ responses to organizational change events. Academy of Management Review43(1): 65–86.
64.
ØygardenOOlsenEMikkelsenA (2020) Changing to improve? Organizational change and change-oriented leadership in hospitals. Journal of Health, Organisation and Management34(6): 687–706.
65.
PMI (2013) Pulse of the profession in-depth report: the essential role of communications. Available at: https://www.pmi.org
66.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
67.
PurwaningrumEKSuhariadiFFajrianthi (2020) Participation and commitment to change on middle managers in Indonesia: the role of perceived organizational support as mediator. Global Business Review21(1): 1–18.
68.
QiLLiuBWeiX, et al. (2019) Impact of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior: perceived organizational support as a mediator. PLoS One14(2): e0212091.
69.
QingMAsifMHussainA, et al. (2019) Exploring the impact of ethical leadership on job satisfaction and organizational commitment in public sector organizations: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science11(16): 21–28.
70.
QurrahtulainKBashirTHussainI, et al. (2022) Impact of inclusive leadership on adaptive performance with the mediation of vigor at work and moderation of internal locus of control. Journal of Public Affairs22(1): e2380.
71.
RaffertyAEMinbashianA (2019) Cognitive beliefs and positive emotions about change: relationships with employee change readiness and change-supportive behaviors. Human Relations72(10): 1623–1650.
72.
RandelAEGalvinBMShoreLM, et al. (2018) Inclusive leadership: realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review28(2): 190–203.
73.
RousseauDMSitkinSBBurtRS, et al. (1998) Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review23(3): 393–404.
74.
SchwarzeMLTaylorLJ (2017) Managing uncertainty — harnessing the power of scenario planning. New England Journal of Medicine377(3): 206–208.
75.
SerratO (2017) Building trust in the workplace. In: SerratO (ed) Knowledge Solutions. Singapore: Springer, 627–632.
76.
ShoreLMClevelandJNSanchezD (2018) Inclusive workplaces: a review and model. Human Resource Management Review28(2): 176–189.
77.
SmollanRParryK (2011) Follower perceptions of the emotional intelligence of change leaders: a qualitative study. Leadership7(4): 435–462.
78.
Statista Research Department (2014) Most effective practices in organizational change management worldwide as of January 2014. Available at: https://www.statista.com
SverdrupTEStensakerIG (2018) Restoring trust in the context of strategic change. Strategic Organization16(4): 401–428.
81.
VakolaMPetrouPKatsarosKK (2021) Work engagement and job crafting as conditions of ambivalent employees’ adaptation to organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science57(1): 57–79.
82.
VallealaUMHerranenSCollinK, et al. (2015) Fostering learning opportunities through employee participation amid organizational change. Vocations and Learning8(1): 1–34.
83.
Veli KorkmazAvan EngenMLKnappertL, et al. (2022) About and beyond leading uniqueness and belongingness: a systematic review of inclusive leadership research. Human Resource Management Review32(4): 1–20.
84.
WeiZYiYYuanC (2011) Bottom-up learning, organizational formalization, and ambidextrous innovation. Journal of Organizational Change Management24(3): 314–329.
85.
WilsonCIrvineKN (2013) Bottom-up communication: identifying opportunities and limitations through an exploratory field-based evaluation. Energy Efficiency6: 91–104.
86.
XiaotaoZYangXDiazI, et al. (2018) Is too much inclusive leadership a good thing? An examination of curvilinear relationship between inclusive leadership and employees’ task performance. International Journal of Manpower39(7): 882–895.
87.
YeQWangDGuoW (2019) Inclusive leadership and team innovation: the role of team voice and performance pressure. European Management Journal37(4): 468–480.
88.
YiYGuMWeiZ (2017) Bottom-up learning, strategic flexibility and strategic change. Journal of Organizational Change Management30(2): 161–183.
89.
YounasAWangDJavedB, et al. (2021) Moving beyond the mechanistic structures: the role of inclusive leadership in developing change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences - Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration38(1): 42–52.
90.
YueCAMenLRFergusonMA (2019) Bridging transformational leadership, transparent communication, and employee openness to change: the mediating role of trust. Public Relations Review45(3): 101779.
91.
ZengHZhaoLZhaoY (2020) Inclusive leadership and taking-charge behavior: roles of psychological safety and thriving at work. Frontiers in Psychology11: 62.
