The current study highlights the importance of cues for quality at the product level on firm performance. Utilizing data from the U.S. auto industry, our results demonstrate that product cues with the highest positive evaluations have a greater impact on improving firm performance due to their ability to showcase the firm’s utmost capability. We also find that the consistency of the highest-rated product cue over time corroborates the credibility of the signal. Furthermore, our research reveals that the effect of consistency of the highest product cue over time, which enhances firm performance, becomes more pronounced when the auto firm is suffering from a poor reputation. These findings suggest that determining how quality evaluations are distributed across the product line is of paramount importance. This determination may enable firms suffering from a poor reputation to allocate their resources asymmetrically, focusing on products with the highest ratings to enhance their overall performance.
BasdeoDKSmithKGGrimmCM, et al. (2006) The impact of market actions on firm reputation. Strategic Management Journal27(12): 1205–1219.
4.
BerlyneDE (1960) Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
BitektineA (2011) Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: the case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review36(1):151–179.
6.
BonardiJPKeimGD (2005) Corporate political strategies for widely salient issues. Academy of Management Review30(3): 555–576.
7.
BoydBKBerghDDKetchenDJ (2010) Reconsidering the reputation—performance relationship: A resource-based view. Journal of Management36(3): 588–609.
ConnellyBLCertoSTIrelandRD, et al. (2011) Signaling theory: a review and assessment. Journal of Management37(1): 39–67.
10.
DaftRLSormunenJParksD (1988) Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: an empirical study. Strategic Management Journal9(2): 123–139.
11.
DeephouseDL (2000) Media reputation as a strategic resource: an integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management26(6): 1091–1112.
12.
DelmarFDavidssonPGartnerWB (2003) Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing18(2): 189–216.
13.
DoddsWBMonroeKBGrewalD (1991) Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research. 28(3): 307–319.
14.
DuttonJEAshfordSJO’NeillRM, et al. (2001) Moves that matter: issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal.44(4): 716–736.
15.
ErdemTSwaitJ (1998) Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology7(2): 131–157.
16.
ErtugGYogevTLeeYG, et al. (2016) The art of representation: how audience-specific reputations affect success in the contemporary art field. Academy of Management Journal59(1): 113–134.
17.
EtzionDPe’erA (2014) Mixed signals: a dynamic analysis of warranty provision in the automotive industry, 1960-2008. Strategic Management Journal35(11): 1605–1625.
18.
EvansDS (1987) The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics35(4): 567–581.
19.
FiskeSTTaylorSE (2008) Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. New York: McGraw Hill.
20.
FombrunC (1996) Reputation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
21.
FombrunC (2007) List of lists: a compilation of international corporate reputation ratings. Corporate Reputation Review10(2): 144–153.
22.
FombrunCShanelyM (1990) What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal.33(2): 233–258.
23.
GomulyaDMishinaY (2017) Signaler credibility, signal susceptibility, and relative reliance on signals: How stakeholders change their evaluative processes after violation of expectations and rehabilitative efforts. Academy of Management Journal60(2): 554–583.
24.
HallR (1992) The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal13(2): 144–153.
25.
HawkinsSAHochSJ (1992) Low-involvement learning: memory without evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research19(2): 212–225.
HomerPM (2008). Perceived quality and image: when all is not “rosy”. Journal of Business Research, 61(7): 715–723.
28.
JensenMKimHKimBK (2012) Meeting expectations: a role-theoretic perspective on reputation. In: BarnettMLPollockTG (eds) Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.140–159.
29.
JohnstonWAHawleyKJPleweSH, et al. (1990) Attention capture by novel stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General119(4): 397–411.
30.
KimKHTsaiW (2012) Social comparison among competing firms. Strategic Management Journal33(2): 115–136.
31.
LangeDLeePMDaiY (2011) Organizational reputation: a review. Journal of Management37(1): 153–184.
32.
LiQMaggittiPGSmithKG, et al. (2013) Top management attention to innovation: the role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Academy of Management Journal56(3): 893–916.
33.
LoveEGKraatzM (2009) Character, conformity, or the bottom line? How and why downsizing affected corporate reputation. Academy of Management Journal52(2): 314–335.
34.
MayRCStewartWHSweoR (2000) Environmental scanning behavior in a transitional economy: evidence from Russia. Academy of Management Journal43(3): 403–427.
35.
MishinaYBlockESMannorMJ (2012) The path dependence of organizational reputation: how social judgment influences assessments of capability and character. Strategic Management Journal33(5): 459–477.
36.
MiyazakiADGrewalDGoodsteinRC (2005) The effect of multiple extrinsic cues on quality perceptions: a matter of consistency. Journal of Consumer Research32(1): 146–153.
37.
Motor1.com (2022) SUVs and Trucks Still Rule US Market Despite Higher Fuel Prices.
38.
MullerJ (2013) The most dependable cars include some surprises. Forbes, 13 February.
39.
MurrayKB (1991) A test of services marketing theory: consumer information acquisition activities. Journal of Marketing55(1): 10–25.
40.
OcasioW (2011) Attention to attention. Organization Science22(5): 1286–1296.
41.
ParuchuriSHanJHPrakashP (2020) Salient Expectations? Incongruence across capability and integrity signals and investor reactions to organizational misconduct. Academy of Management Journal64(2): 562–586.
42.
PollockTGRindovaVPMaggittiPG (2008) Market watch: Information and availability cascades among the media and investors in the US IPO market. Academy of Management Journal51(2): 335–358.
43.
PRNewswire (2020) Kia Motors America Announces December Sales. 3 January.
44.
PurohitDSrivastavaJ (2001) Effect of manufacturer reputation, retailer reputation, and product warranty on consumer judgments of product quality: a cue diagnosticity framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology10(3): 123–134.
45.
ReederGDBrewerMB (1979) A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review86(1): 61–79.
46.
RheeMHaunschildPR (2006) The liability of good reputation: a study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organization Science17(1): 101–117.
47.
RindovaVPWilliamsonIOPetkovaAP, et al. (2005) Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organization reputation. Academy of Management Journal48(6): 1033–1049.
48.
RindovaVPPollockTGHaywardML (2006) Celebrity firms: the social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review31(1): 50–71.
49.
RobertsPWDowlingGR (2002) Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal23(12): 1077–1093.
50.
RoseliusT (1971) Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing35(1): 56–61.
51.
SenguptaJJoharGV (2002) Effects of inconsistent attribute information on the predictive value of product attitudes: toward a resolution of opposing perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research29(1): 39–56.
52.
ShamsieJ (2003) The context of dominance: an industry‐driven framework for exploiting reputation. Strategic Management Journal24(3): 199–215.
53.
ShapiroC (1983) Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. Quarterly Journal of Economics98(4): 659–680.
54.
SimonHA (1982) Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason. Boston: MIT press.
55.
SkowronskiJJCarlstonDE (1987) Social judgment and social memory: the role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52(4): 689–699.
56.
SkowronskiJJCarlstonDE (1989) Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: a review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin105(1): 131–142.
57.
SpenceM (1973) Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics87(3): 355–374.
58.
SternIDukerichJMZajacE (2014) Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal35(4): 512–531.
59.
StiglitzJE (2002) Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. The American Economic Review92(3): 460–501.
60.
StuartTEHoangHHybelsRC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly44(2): 315–349.
61.
StylidisKHoffensonSRossiM, et al. (2020) Transforming brand core values into perceived quality: a Volvo case study. International Journal of Product Development24(1): 43–67.
62.
StylidisKRossiMŽukasJ, et al. (2021) Addressing information asymmetry during design: customer-centric approach to harmonization of car body split-lines. Procedia CIRP104: 110–115.
63.
StylidisKQuattelbaumBBergsjöD, et al. (2022) Perceived quality attributes importance ranking methodology in the automotive industry: a case study on geometry appearance attributes at CEVT. Procedia CIRP107: 1559–1564.
64.
TaylorSEFiskeST (1975) Point of view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology32(3): 439–445.
65.
The Economist (2002) Twenty years down the road. 12 September.
66.
TverskyAKahnemanD (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science185: 1124–1131.
67.
Valdes-DapenaP (2020) Demand for the Kia Telluride SUV is so high dealers can’t keep them on their lots. CNN Business, 24 July.
68.
WeigeltKCamererC (1988) Reputation and corporate strategy: a review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal9(5): 443–454.
69.
YuTCannellaA (2007) Rivalry between multinational enterprises: an event history approach. Academy of Management Journal50(3): 665–686.
70.
ZhaoWZhouX (2011) Status inconsistency and product valuation in the California wine market. Organization Science22(6): 1435–1448.
