Ethical leadership emphasizes the promotion of ethical behavior through two-way communication with followers. This article introduces the development of an ethical leadership communication scale that was created based on three categories of an ethical leadership conceptual framework, namely, the leader being an example of ethics in action, the leader treating his/her followers fairly, the leader actively managing morality. Relevant items were developed and subjected to factor analysis with a sample of 175 respondents from organization A, resulting in a 1-factor solution with 15 items. Using a 522-person sample from organizations B and C, we verified the 1-factor solution with 15-item with confirmatory factor analysis. We further validated the 15-item ethical leadership communication scale by regressing outcomes with structural equation modeling (SEM) from Organization D. We then tested the ethical leadership communication scale with the ethical leadership questionnaire and ethical leadership survey (ELS), and analyzed the data using multi-level hierarchical regression. Results suggest that the ethical leadership communication scale as a construct is a unique contribution beyond the ethical leadership constructs in explaining organizational citizenship behaviors. The new ethical leadership communication scale (the Ethical Leadership Communication Scale-15) demonstrates adequate reliability, validity, and across organization generalizability. Findings of this study further the model of ethical leadership and communication behavior and help to re-conceptualize the role of dyadic communication in ethical leadership. This study paves the way for finer-grained theorizing and analysis of ethical leadership and communication dynamics in the workplace.
AryeeSWalumbwaFOMondejarR, et al. (2017) Core self-evaluations and employee voice behavior: test of a dual-motivational pathway. Journal of Management43(3): 946–966.
2.
AshforthBEMaelF (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review14(1): 20–39.
3.
BakarAHMcCannRM (2016) The mediating effect of leader–member dyadic communication style agreement on the relationship between servant leadership and group-level organizational citizenship behavior. Management Communication Quarterly30(1): 32–58.
4.
BakarHAOmilion-HodgesLM (2020) The mediating role of relative communicative behavior on the relationship between ethical leadership and organizational identification. Leadership and Organizational Development41(1): 52–72.
5.
BarbutoJE,JrWheelerDW (2006) Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group and Organization Management31(3): 300–326.
6.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
7.
BashshurMROcB (2015) When voice matters: a multilevel review of the impact of voice in organizations. Journal of Management41(5): 1530–1554.
8.
BediAAlpaslanCMGreenS (2016) A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics139(3): 517–536.
9.
BiselRSAdameEA (2019) Encouraging upward ethical dissent in organizations: the role of deference to embodied expertise. Management Communication Quarterly33(2): 139–159.
10.
BirdAMendenhallME (2016) From cross-cultural management to global leadership: evolution and adaptation. Journal of World Business51(1): 115–126.
11.
BlauPM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, NY: Wiley.
12.
BliesePDMaltarichMAHendricksJL, et al. (2019) Improving the measurement of group-level constructs by optimizing between-group differentiation. Journal of Applied Psychology104(2): 293–302.
13.
BolinoMCKlotzACTurnleyWH, et al. (2013) Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior34(4): 542–559.
14.
BrewerMBWeberJG (1994) Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology66(2): 268–275.
15.
BrownMETreviñoLKHarrisonDA (2005) Ethical leadership: a social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes97(2): 117–134.
16.
BrownMETreviñoLK (2014) Do role models matter? An investigation of role modeling as an antecedent of perceived ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics122(4): 587–598.
17.
ChenASYHouYH (2016) The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: a moderated mediation examination. Leadership Quarterly27(1): 1–13.
18.
CraigSBGustafsonSB (1998) Perceived leader integrity scale: an instrument for assessing employee perceptions of leader integrity. Leadership Quarterly9(2): 127–145.
19.
De CremerDVandekerckhoveW (2017) Managing unethical behavior in organizations: the need for a behavioral business ethics approach. Journal of Management and Organization23(3): 437–455.
20.
De HooghAHDen HartogDN (2008) Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: a multi-method study. Leadership Quarterly19(3): 297–311.
21.
DekasKHBauerTNWelleB, et al. (2013) Organizational citizenship behavior, version 2.0: a review and qualitative investigation of OCBs for knowledge workers at Google and beyond. Academy of Management Perspectives27(3): 219–237.
22.
DerueDSNahrgangJDWellmanNED, et al. (2011) Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta‐analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology64(1): 7–52.
23.
DeVellisRF (2016) Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24.
De WinterJCDodouD (2016) Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: a comparison of loadings by means of simulations. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation45(1): 299–321.
25.
DyerNGHangesPJHallRJ (2005) Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leadership Quarterly16(1): 149–167.
26.
EisenbeissSA (2012) Re-thinking ethical leadership: an interdisciplinary integrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly23(5): 791–808.
27.
EisenbeissSABrodbeckF (2014) Ethical and unethical leadership: a cross-cultural and cross-sectoral analysis. Journal of Business Ethics122(5): 343–359.
28.
FehrRYamKCDangC (2015) Moralized leadership: the construction and consequences of ethical leader perceptions. Academy of Management Review40(2): 182–209.
29.
FrazierMLBowlerWM (2015) Voice climate, supervisor undermining, and work outcomes: a group-level examination. Journal of Management41(3): 841–863.
30.
GiessnerSVan QuaquebekeN (2010) Using a relational model’s perspective to understand normatively appropriate conduct in ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics95(1): 43–55.
31.
GillCCazaA (2018) An investigation of authentic leadership’s individual and group influences on follower responses. Journal of Management44(2): 530–554.
32.
GrahamKAZiegertJCCapitanoJ (2015) The effect of leadership style, framing, and promotion regulatory focus on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics126: 423–436.
33.
GrovesKSLaRoccaMA (2011) An empirical study of leader ethical values, transformational and transactional leadership, and follower attitudes toward corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics103(4): 511–528.
34.
HayesAF (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs76(4): 408–420.
35.
HeHBrownAD (2013) Organizational identity and organizational identification: a review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group and Organization Management38(1): 3–35.
36.
HochJEBommerWHDulebohnJH, et al. (2018) Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management44(2): 501–529.
37.
HoffmanBJBlairCAMeriacJP, et al. (2007) Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature. Journal of Applied Psychology92(2): 555–566.
38.
HoffmanBJStrangSEKuhnertKW, et al. (2013) Leader narcissism and ethical context: effects on ethical leadership and leader effectiveness. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies20(1): 25–37.
39.
HonigBLampelJSiegelD, et al. (2017) Special section on ethics in management research: norms, identity, and community in the 21st century. Academy of Management Learning and Education16(1): 84–93.
40.
HopkinsWEScottSG (2016) Values-based leadership effectiveness in culturally diverse workplaces. Cross Cultural and Strategic Management23(2): 363–385.
41.
HoytCLPriceTL (2015) Ethical decision making and leadership: merging social role and self-construal perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics126(4): 531–539.
42.
HuangYH (2004) Is symmetrical communication ethical and effective?Journal of Business Ethics53(4): 333–352.
43.
HuangLPatersonTA (2017) Group ethical voice: influence of ethical leadership and impact on ethical performance. Journal of Management43(4): 1157–1184.
44.
HuLTBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
45.
JamesLRDemareeRGWolfG (1993) rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology78(2): 306–309.
46.
JordanJBrownMETreviñoLK, et al. (2013) Someone to look up to: executive–follower ethical reasoning and perceptions of ethical leadership. Journal of Management39(3): 660–683.
47.
KalshovenKDen HartogDNDe HooghAH (2011) Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Leadership Quarterly22(1): 51–69.
48.
KalshovenKvan DijkHBoonC (2016) Why and when does ethical leadership evoke unethical follower behavior?Journal of Managerial Psychology31(2): 500–515.
49.
KennyDABolgerNKashyDA (2002) Traditional methods for estimating multilevel models. In: MoskowitzDSHershbergerHL (eds), Modeling Intraindividual Variability With Repeated Measures Data: Methods and Applications. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, pp. 1–24.
50.
KimDVandenbergheC (2020) Ethical leadership and team ethical voice and citizenship behavior in the military: the roles of team moral efficacy and ethical climate. Group and Organization Management45(4): 514–555.
51.
KoCMaJBartnikR, et al. (2018) Ethical leadership: an integrative review and future research agenda. Ethics and Behavior28(2): 104–132.
52.
LawtonAPáezI (2015) Developing a framework for ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics130(3): 639–649.
53.
LeeDChoiYYounS, et al. (2017) Ethical leadership and employee moral voice: the mediating role of moral efficacy and the moderating role of leader–follower value congruence. Journal of Business Ethics141(1): 47–57.
54.
LuX (2014) Ethical leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal42(3): 379–389.
55.
LiuH (2017) The masculinisation of ethical leadership dis/embodiment. Journal of Business Ethics144(2): 263–278.
56.
MahsudRYuklGPrussiaG (2010) Leader empathy, ethical leadership, and relations-oriented behaviors as antecedents of leader-member exchange quality. Journal of Managerial Psychology25(6): 561–577.
57.
MathieuJETaylorSR (2007) A framework for testing meso‐mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior28(2): 141–172.
58.
MayerDMAquinoKGreenbaumRL, et al. (2012) Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal55(1): 151–171.
59.
McCarthyJMTrougakosJPChengBH (2016) Are anxious workers less productive workers? It depends on the quality of social exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology101(2): 279–291.
60.
MeisenbachRJ (2017) Integrating ethics and responsibility into organizational communication research: Issues and new directions. Management Communication Quarterly31(1): 146–152.
61.
NewmanAKiazadKMiaoQ, et al. (2014) Examining the cognitive and affective trust-based mechanisms underlying the relationship between ethical leadership and organizational citizenship: a case of the head leading the heart?Journal of Business Ethics123(1): 113–123.
62.
NgTWFeldmanDC (2015) Ethical leadership: meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology100(3): 948–965.
63.
OforiG (2009) Ethical leadership: examining the relationships with full range leadership model, employee outcomes, and organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics90(4): 53–547.
64.
Omilion-HodgesLMBakerCR (2013) Contextualizing LMX within the workgroup: the effects of LMX and justice on relationship quality and resource sharing among peers. Leadership Quarterly24(6): 935–951.
65.
PatersonTAHuangL (2019) Am I expected to be ethical? A role-definition perspective of ethical leadership and unethical behavior. Journal of Management45(7): 2837–2860.
66.
PloegerNABiselRS (2013) The role of identification in giving sense to unethical organizational behavior: defending the organization. Management Communication Quarterly27(2): 155–183.
67.
PohlingRBzdokDEigenstetterM, et al. (2016) What is ethical competence? The role of empathy, personal values, and the five-factor model of personality in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics137(2): 449–474.
68.
PorterCOOutlawRGaleJP, et al. (2019) The use of online panel data in management research: a review and recommendations. Journal of Management45(1): 319–344.
69.
RaudenbuschSWBrykASCheongYF, et al. (2004) HLM6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
70.
ResickCJHangesPJDicksonMW, et al. (2006) A cross-cultural examination of the endorsement of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics63(2): 345–359.
71.
ResickCJMartinGSKeatingMA, et al. (2011) What ethical leadership means to me: Asian, American, and European perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics101: 435–457.
72.
ReuberARMorgan-ThomasA (2019) Communicating moral legitimacy in controversial industries: the trade in human tissue. Journal of Business Ethics154(1): 49–63.
73.
RiggioREZhuWReinaC, et al. (2010) Virtue-based measurement of ethical leadership: the leadership virtues questionnaire. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research62(4): 235–250.
74.
QianYJianG (2020) Ethical leadership and organizational cynicism: the mediating role of leader-member exchange and organizational identification. Corporate Communications: An International Journal25(2): 207–226.
75.
SchaubroeckJMHannahSTAvolioBJ, et al. (2012) Embedding ethical leadership within and across organization levels. Academy of Management Journal55(5): 1053–1078.
76.
SekerkaLEBagozziRPCharnigoR (2009) Facing ethical challenges in the workplace: conceptualizing and measuring professional moral courage. Journal of Business Ethics89(4): 565–579.
77.
SharifMMScanduraTA (2014) Do perceptions of ethical conduct matter during organizational change? Ethical leadership and employee involvement. Journal of Business Ethics124(2): 185–196.
78.
SheronyKMGreenSG (2002) Coworker exchange: relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology87(3): 542.
79.
ShinY (2012) CEO ethical leadership, ethical climate, climate strength, and collective organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Ethics108(3): 299–312.
80.
SiasPMGallagherEBKopanevaI, et al. (2012) Maintaining workplace friendships: perceived politeness and predictors of maintenance tactic choice. Communication Research39(2): 239–268.
81.
SmithCAOrganDWNearJP (1983) Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology68(4): 653–663.
82.
SpectorPERosenCCRichardsonHA, et al. (2019) A new perspective on method variance: a measure-centric approach. Journal of Management45(3): 855–880.
83.
SteinbauerRRennRWTaylorRR, et al. (2014) Ethical leadership and followers’ moral judgment: the role of followers’ perceived accountability and self-leadership. Journal of Business Ethics120(3): 381–392.
84.
Van DyneLLePineJA (1998) Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal41(1): 108–119.
85.
VenkataramaniVZhouLWangM, et al. (2016) Social networks and employee voice: the influence of team members’ and team leaders’ social network positions on employee voice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes132(1): 37–48.
86.
WalumbwaFOAvolioBJGardnerWL, et al. (2008) Authentic leadership: development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management34(1): 89–126.
87.
WalumbwaFOSchaubroeckJ (2009) Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology94(5): 1275–1289.
88.
WalumbwaFOHartnellCAMisatiE (2017) Does ethical leadership enhance group learning behavior? Examining the mediating influence of group ethical conduct, justice climate, and peer justice. Journal of Business Research72(3): 14–23.
89.
WalumbwaFOMorrisonEWChristensenAL (2012) Ethical leadership and group in-role performance: the mediating roles of group conscientiousness and group voice. Leadership Quarterly23(5): 953–964.
90.
WangZXingLXuH, et al. (2021) Not all followers socially learn from ethical leaders: the roles of followers’ moral identity and leader identification in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics170: 449–469.
91.
XuAJLoiRNgoHY (2016) Ethical leadership behavior and employee justice perceptions: the mediating role of trust in organization. Journal of Business Ethics134(3): 493–504.
92.
YuklGMahsudRHassanS, et al. (2013) An improved measure of ethical leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies20(1): 38–48.
93.
ZaninACBiselRSAdameEA (2016) Supervisor moral talk contagion and trust-in-supervisor: mitigating the workplace moral mum effect. Management Communication Quarterly30(2): 147–163.
