This study seeks to identify the factors that can simultaneously improve the environmental and financial performance of a company and determine if an improvement in the environmental performance of a company is accompanied by an improvement in its financial performance. We estimate a system of structural equations using the partial least squares approach applied to data on 351 large European-registered companies extracted from the ASSET4-Environmental, Social, and Governance database for the 2007–2015 period. The results show that the engagement of a company in environmental protection is significantly affected by the system of governance of the company and the availability of financial resources at the 1 and 5% levels, respectively. The results also show that engaging in environmental protection increases the accounting and stock exchange performance of companies. These results thus suggest that the protection of the ecosystem by companies leads to a paradigm, which can form the basis of a model of responsible governance whose goal is to create value while respecting environmental factors.
ACFCI (2006) La prise en compte du développement durable et de la responsabilité sociétale de l’entreprise (DD/ RSE) par les PME-PMI. octobre.
2.
AldrichHEFiolCM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review19(4): 645–670.
3.
AmbecSLanoieP (2009) Performance environnementale et économique de l’entreprise. Economie & Prévision4-5-6(190-191): 71–94.
4.
BagozziRPYiY (1994) Advanced topics in structural equation models. In: BogozziRP (ed) Avanced Méthods of Marketing Research151.
5.
BarneyJB (1986) Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?Academy of Management Review11(3): 656–665.
6.
BocquetAM (2013) L’engagement environnemental de l’entreprise: quelle responsabilité envers quelles parties prenantes? Les cas Migros et Coop sur le marché agroalimentaire suisse. Management Avenir6(64): 35–55.
7.
BoulerneSSahutJM (2010) Les sources d’inefficacité des mécanismes de gouvernance d’entreprise. Management & Avenir3(33): 374–387.
8.
BowenFE (2002) Does size matter? Organizational slack and visibility as alternative explanations for environmental responsiveness. Business & Society41(1): 118–124.
9.
BrownLDCaylorML (2006) Corporate governance and firm valuation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy25(4): 409–434.
10.
CardebatJMCassagnardP (2011) La responsabilité sociale des entreprises comme instrument de couverture du risque de réputation. La Responsabilité Sociale de l’Entreprise: Nouvelle régulation du capitalisme1: 73.
11.
CardebatJMDardourA (2013) The link between the publication of CSR reports and market performance of European companies between 2000 and 2010. Innovations40(1): 145–163.
12.
ChangK (2015) The effect of environmental performance and preference disclosure on financial performance: empirical evidence from unbalanced panel data of heavy-pollution industries in China. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management8(1): 21–36.
13.
ChinWW (2010) How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: WangHHenselerJVinziVE, et al. (eds), Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 655–690.
14.
ClarkTGunnarssonCSkeldonK, et al. (2002) The impact of profitability, certainty, and degree of fine on the persuasiveness of environmental assessment reports. The Journal of Business Communication (1973)39(2): 169–192.
15.
ColeMAElliottRJStroblE (2008) The environmental performance of firms: the role of foreign ownership, training, and experience. Ecological Economics65(3): 538–546.
16.
CormierDMagnanMVelthovenB (2005) Environmental disclosure quality: do firms respond to economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions?European Accounting Review14(1): 1–37.
17.
CrifoPRebériouxA (2015) Gouvernance et responsabilité sociétale des entreprises: nouvelle frontière de la finance durable?Revue d’économie financière1(117): 205–223.
18.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–160.
19.
Djoutsa WambaLBrauneEHikkerovaL (2018) Does shareholder-oriented corporate governance reduce firm risk? Evidence from listed European companies. Journal of Applied Accounting Research19(2): 295–311.
20.
Djoutsa WambaLHikkerovaLSahutJM, et al. (2019) Gouvernance et risque systématique de l’entreprise. Revue Française de Gouvernance d’Entreprise (21): 72–95.
21.
Djoutsa WambaLSahutJMBrauneE, et al. (2020) Does the optimization of a company’s environmental performance reduce its systematic risk? New evidence from European listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management27(4): 1677–1694.
22.
DonaldsonTPrestonLE (1995) The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review20(1): 65–91.
23.
DoonanJLanoiePLaplanteB (2005) Determinants of environmental performance in the Canadian pulp and paper industry: an assessment from inside the industry. Ecological Economics55(1): 73–84.
24.
DrobetzWSchillhoferAZimmermannH (2004) Corporate governance and expected stock returns: evidence from Germany. European Financial Management10(2): 267–293.
25.
EfronBTibshiraniRJ (1994) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
26.
EndrikatJGuentherEHoppeH (2014) Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: a meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. European Management Journal32(5): 735–751.
27.
FalkRFMillerNB (1992) A Primer for Soft Modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.
28.
FlammerC (2015) Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science61(11): 2549–2568.
29.
FornellCBooksteinFL (1982) Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research19: 440–452.
30.
FornellCLarkerD (1981) Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
31.
FreemanR-E (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
32.
FriedmanM (1960) A Program for Monetary Stability (No. 3). Cambridge: Ravenio Books.
33.
FriedmanM (1972) Comments on the critics. Journal of Political Economy80(5): 906–950.
34.
GainetC (2010) Exploring the impact of legal systems and financial structure on corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics95(2): 195–222.
35.
GalanderAWalgenbachPRostK (2015) Corporate governance soft law regulations from a social norm perspective. Corporate Governance15(1): 31–51.
36.
GeorgeG (2005) Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal48(4): 661–676.
37.
GodfreyPC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: a risk management perspective. Academy of management review30(4): 777–798.
38.
GondJPMercierS (2006) La théorie des parties prenantes. In: Encyclopédie des ressources Humaines, 2ème éd. Paris: VUIBERT, pp. 917–925.
39.
GramlichDFinsterN (2013) Corporate sustainability and risk. Journal of Business Economics83(6): 631–664.
40.
GrantRM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal17(S2): 109–122.
41.
HibikiAHigachiMMatsudaA (2003) Determinants of the firm to Acquire ISO14001 certificate and market valuation of the Certified Firm, Discussión Paper, No. 03-06. Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo.
42.
HillaryR (ed) (2017) Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Environment: Business Imperatives. London: Routledge.
43.
HojatAHMRahimKAChinL (2010) Firm’s environmental performance: a review of their determinants. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration2(3): 330–338.
44.
HorvathovaE (2010) Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis. Ecological economics70(1): 52–59.
45.
HuangC-J (2010)Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of Management & Organization16: 641–655.
46.
HybelsRC (1995, August) On legitimacy, legitimation, and organizations: a critical review and integrative theoretical model. In: Academy of Management Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management, pp. 241–245
47.
JanicotL (2007) Les systèmes d’indicateurs de performance environnementale (IPE), entre communication et contrôle. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit13(1): 47–67.
48.
KingALenoxM (2001) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science48(2): 289–299.
49.
KonarSCohenMA (2001) Does the market value environmental performance?Review of Economics and Statistics83(2): 281–289.
50.
LacrouxA (2009) L’analyse des modèles de relations structurelles par la méthode PLS: une approche émergente dans la recherche quantitative en GRH. XXème congrès de l’AGRH, Toulouse.
51.
Ludevid AngladaM (2000) Small and medium-sized enterprises. Perceptions of the environment: a study from Spain’. In: HillaryR (ed), Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and the Environment. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
52.
MackeyAMackeyTBBarneyJB (2007) « Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: investor preferences and corporate strategies ». Academy of Management Review32(3): 817–835.
53.
ManriqueSMartí-BallesterCP (2017) Analyzing the effect of corporate environmental performance on corporate financial performance in developed and developing countries. Sustainability9(11): 1957.
54.
Marquet-PondevilleS (2003) Le contrôle de gestion environnemental. Doctorat en sciences de gestion. Louvain: UCL, Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
55.
MercierS (2010) Une analyse historique du concept de parties prenantes: Quelles leçons pour l’avenir?Management Avenir3(33): 142–156.
56.
MeyerJWRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340–363.
57.
MitchellRKAgleBRWoodDJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review22(4): 853–886.
58.
MoneckeALeischF (2012) SemPLS: structural equation modeling using partial least squares. Journal of Statistical Software48(3): 1–32.
59.
MonevaJMOrtasE (2010) Corporate environmental and financial performance: a multivariate approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems110(2): 193–210.
60.
NagarALBasuSR (2002) Weighting socioeconomic indicators of human development: a latent variable approach. Statistics Textbooks and Monographs165: 609–642.
61.
NasiJNasiSPhillipsN, et al. (1997) The evolution of corporate social responsiveness: an exploratory study of Finnish and Canadian forestry companies. Business & Society36(3): 296–321.
62.
NunnallyJCBernsteinIH (1994) Psychometric Theory. 3 rd edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
63.
OrlitzkyM (2013) Corporate social responsibility, noise, and stock market volatility. Academy of Management Perspectives27(3): 238–254.
64.
OrlitzkyMSchmidtFLRynesSL (2003) Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies24(3): 403–441.
65.
PagalungGPontohGT (2014) Corporate disclosure as mediating variable on effect of financial resources, capability, and characteristic of corporate to environmental performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research3(8): 257–265.
66.
Pasquini-DescompsHSahutJM (2015) ESG impact on market performance of firms: international evidence. Management International/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional19(2): 40–63.
67.
PenroseET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York, NY: Sharpe.
68.
PorterMEvan der LindeC (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives9(4): 97–118.
69.
RadhouaneINekhiliMNagatiH, et al. (2017) Divulgation environnementale et performance financière des grandes entreprises française. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion5-6(287-288): 89–98.
RevelliCVivianiJL (2013) The link between SRI and financial performance: effects and moderators. Management international/International Management/Gestiòn Internacional17(2): 105–122.
72.
SahutJMMiliMTeulonF (2018) Gouvernance, RSE et performance financière: vers une compréhension globale de leurs relations?Management & Avenir3(101): 39–59.
73.
SaloJ (2008) Corporate governance and environmental performance: industry and country effects. Competition & Change12(4): 328–354.
74.
SavallHZardetV (2007) Le concept de coût-valeur des activités. Contribution de la théorie socio-économique des organisations. Revue Sciences de gestion (64): 61–89.
75.
ScottWR (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
76.
SetyawanHKamillaP (2015) Impact of corporate governance on corporate environmental disclosure: Indonesian evidence. In: International Conference on Trends in Economics, Humanities and Management (ICTEHM’15), 12–13 August, Pattaya (Thailand).
77.
ShahwanTM (2015) The effects of corporate governance on financial performance and financial distress: evidence from Egypt. Corporate Governance15(5): 641–662.
78.
ShahzadAMMousaFTSharfmanMP (2016) The implications of slack heterogeneity for the slack-resources and corporate social performance relationship. Journal of Business Research69(12): 5964–5971.
79.
ShiXYBanJG (2016) The research on the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance. Journal of Finance and Accounting4(2): 81–85.
80.
SyedMAButtSA (2017) Financial and non-financial determinants of corporate social responsibility: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Social Responsibility Journal13(4): 780–797.
81.
TenenhausMHanafiM (2010) A bridge between PLS path modeling and multi-block data analysis. In: WangHHenselerJVinziVE, et al. (eds), Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 99–123.
82.
TenenhausMVinziVE (2005) PLS regression, PLS path modeling and generalized Procrustean analysis: a combined approach for multiblock analysis. Journal of Chemometrics19(3): 145–153.
83.
TestaMD’AmatoA (2017) Corporate environmental responsibility and financial performance: does bidirectional causality work? Empirical evidence from the manufacturing industry. Social Responsibility Journal13(2): 221–234.
TilleyF (1999) The gap between the environmental attitudes and the environmental behaviour of small firms. Business Strategy and the Environment8(4): 238–248.
86.
TitmanSWesselsR (1988) The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance43(1): 1–19.
87.
TrumppCEndrikatJZopfC, et al. (2015) Definition, conceptualization, and measurement of corporate environmental performance: a critical examination of a multidimensional construct. Journal of Business Ethics126(2): 185–204.
88.
TsoutsouraM (2004) Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Working Paper, March.
89.
TurkiA (2014) La relation entre la certification environnementale ISO 14001 et la performance environnementale–Étude de cas sur quatre entreprises tunisiennes. Développement durable et territoires. Économie, géographie, politique, droit, sociologie5(2).
90.
VinziVETrincheraLAmatoS (2010) PLS path modeling: from foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In: WangHHenselerJVinziVE, et al. (eds), Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 47–82.
91.
WaddockSAGravesSB (1997) The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal18(4): 303–319.
92.
WallsJLBerronePPhanPH (2012) Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?Strategic Management Journal33(8): 885–913.
93.
WeigeltKCamererC (1988) Reputation and corporate strategy: a review of recent theory and applications. Strategic Management Journal9(5): 443–454.
94.
WernerfeltB (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal5(2): 171–180.
95.
WintokiMBLinckJSNetterJM (2012) Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics105(3): 581–606.
96.
WoraeTANgwakweCC (2017) Environmental responsibility and financial performance nexus in South Africa: panel Granger causality analysis. Environmental Economics8(3): 29–34.
97.
XueBLiPZhangZ (2017) The impact of multi-dimensional environmental performance on firm performance and risk. In: European Financial Management Association, Annual Meetings, 28 June–1 July, Athens, Greece.
98.
YtterhusBESynnestvedtT (1996) The process of greening: results from the Nordic Business Environmental Barometer. Eco-Management and Auditing3(1): 30–36.
99.
ZagorchevAGaoL (2015) Corporate governance and performance of financial institutions. Journal of Economics and Business82: 17–41.
100.
ZhangKQChenHH (2017) Environmental performance and financing decisions impact on sustainable financial development of Chinese environmental protection enterprises. Sustainability9(12): 2260. 1–14.
