In today’s ever-changing environment, a manufacturing firm depends increasingly on suppliers to sustain its competitiveness. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that supply chain disruptions impair a firm’s ability to deliver customer value. The adverse effect is more significant when the supply chains in question are inflexible rather than flexible. This research argues that supplier-dedicated resources (SRs) and supplier flexibility (SF) determine a manufacturing firm’s competitive advantage (CA) and provide a comprehensive view of these supply chain-based factors in the same model. Based on data from 201 respondents in US manufacturing firms that vary in industry type and company size, the results confirm that SRs are critically extended resources for a manufacturing firm. The results also demonstrate that SF mediates the effect of SRs on a manufacturer’s sustainable CA fully. Further, the research develops and verifies SRs as a second-order construct reflecting the synergistic benefit of three subconstructs: dedicated technology, engineers and managers, and company climate.
Amoako-GyampahKGyasi BoakyeKAdakuE, et al. (2019) Supplier relationship management and firm performance in developing countries: a moderated mediation analysis of flexibility capability and ownership structure. International Journal of Production Economics208: 160–170.
2.
AnandGWardP (2009) Fit, flexibility, and performance in manufacturing: coping with dynamic environments. Production and Operations Management13(4): 369–385.
3.
AvittathurBSwamidassP (2007) Matching plant flexibility and supplier flexibility: lessons from small suppliers of US manufacturing plants in India. Journal of Operations Management25(3): 717–735.
4.
BarneyJClarkD (2007) Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5.
BaronRKennyD (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
6.
Beltran-MartinIRoca-PuigVEscrig-TenaA, et al. (2008) Human resource flexibility as a mediating variable between high performance work systems and performance. Journal of Management34(5): 1009–1044.
7.
BensaouMVenkatramanN (1995) Configurations of interorganizational relationships: a comparison between US and Japanese automakers. Management Science41(9): 1471–1492.
8.
BerteaPZaitA (2011) Methods for testing discriminant validity. Management and Marketing9(2): 217–224.
9.
ByrneB (2009) Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
10.
CaddenTHumphreysPMcHughM (2010) The influence of organizational culture on strategic supply chain relationship success. Journal of General Management36(2): 37–64.
11.
CaoMZhangQ (2011) Supply chain collaboration: impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management29(3): 163–180.
12.
ChangSCChenRHLinRJ, et al.(2006) Supplier involvement and manufacturing flexibility. Technovation26 (10): 1136–1146.
13.
ChristopherM (2000) The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management29(1): 37–44.
14.
CousinsPDLawsonBSquireB (2008) Performance measurement in strategic buyer-supplier relationships: the mediating role of socialization mechanisms. International Journal of Operations and Production Management28(3): 238–258.
15.
CoxALonsdaleCWatsonG, et al. (2005) Supplier relationship management as an investment: evidence from a UK study. Journal of General Management30(4): 27–42.
16.
DillmanDPhelpsGTortoraR, et al. (2009) Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the internet. Social Science Research38(1): 1–18.
17.
DonadaCDostalerI (2010) A model of supplier dissidence in flexible vertical partnerships. Journal of General Management35(3): 25–39.
18.
DuclosLVokurkaRLummusR (2003) A conceptual model of supply chain flexibility. Industrial Management and Data Systems103(6): 446–456.
19.
DyerJSinghH (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review23(4): 660–679.
20.
DyerJSinghHHesterlyW (2018) The relational view revisited: a dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture. Strategic Management Journal39(12): 3140–3162.
21.
EdelbroekRPetersPBlommeR (2019) Engaging in open innovation: the mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and the quality of the open innovation process as perceived by employees. Journal of General Management45(1): 5–17.
22.
FlynnEFlynnB (1996) Achieving simultaneous cost and differentiation competitive advantage through continuous improvement: world class manufacturing as a competitive strategy. Journal of Managerial Issues8(3): 360–379.
23.
FornellCLarckerD (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
24.
GaravelliA (2003) Flexibility configurations for the supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics85(2): 141–153.
25.
GerwinD (1993) Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective. Management Science39(4): 395–410.
26.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of The Theory of Structure. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
27.
HairJBlackBBabinB, et al. (2005) Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
HallR (2000) The management of external resources. Journal of General Management26(1): 56–68
29.
HandfieldRBechtelC (2002) The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management31(4): 367–382.
30.
HaynesSRichardDKubanyE (1995) Content validity in psychological assessment: a functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment7(3): 238–247.
31.
HillAJohnsonSGGrecoLM, et al. (2021) Endogeneity: a review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management47(1): 105–143.
32.
HoskissonRGambetaEGreenC, et al. (2018) Is my firm-specific investment protected? Overcoming the stakeholder investment dilemma in the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review43(2): 284–306.
33.
KangMHongPBartnikR, et al. (2018) Aligning purchasing portfolio management with sourcing negotiation styles. Management Decision56(11): 2341–2356.
34.
KlassenRJacobsJ (2001) Experimental comparison of web, electronic and mail survey technologies in operations management. Journal of Operations Management19(6): 713–728.
35.
KosteLMalhotraM (1999) A theoretical framework for analyzing the dimensions of manufacturing flexibility. Journal of Operations Management18(1): 75–93.
36.
KoufterosXVonderembseMDollW (1998) Developing measures of time-based manufacturing. Journal of Operations Management16(1): 21–41
37.
KovachJHoraMManikaA, et al. (2015) Firm performance in dynamic environments: the role of operational slack and operational scope. Journal of Operations Management37(1): 1–12.
38.
KrauseDHandfieldRScannellT (1998) An empirical investigation of supplier development: reactive and strategic processes. Journal of Operations Management17 (1): 39–58.
39.
KuoYYangTParkerD, et al. (2016) Integration of customer and supplier flexibility in a make-to-order industry. Industrial Management and Data Systems116(2): 213–235.
40.
LaiFZhangMLeeD, et al. (2012) The impact of supply chain integration on mass customization capability: an extended resource-based view. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management59(3): 443–456.
41.
LajiliKLinLRostamkalaeiA (2020) Corporate governance, human capital resources, and firm performance: exploring the missing links. Journal of General Management45(4): 192–205.
42.
LauR (1999) Critical factors for achieving manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Operations and Production Management19(3): 328–341.
43.
LavieD (2006) The competitive performance of interconnected firms: an extension of the resource-based view. Academy Management Review31(3): 638–658.
44.
LepakDSnellS (2002) Examining the human resource architecture: the relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. Journal of Management28(4): 517–543.
45.
LewisMBandon-JonesASlackN, et al. (2010) Competing through operations and supply-the role of classic and extended resource-based advantage. International Journal of Operations and Product Management30(10): 1032–1058.
46.
LiaoYHongPSubra RaoS (2010) Supply management, supply flexibility and performance outcomes: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. Journal Supply Chain Management46(3): 6–22.
47.
MarshHHocevarD (1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin97(3): 562–582.
48.
MarshallRNguyenTBryantS (2005) A dynamic model of trust development and knowledge sharing in strategic alliances. Journal of General Management31(1): 41–57.
49.
MesquitaLLazzariniSCroninP (2007) Determinants of firm competitiveness in Latin American emerging economics: evidence from Brazil’s auto-parts industry. International Journal of Operations and Production Management27(5): 501–523.
50.
MooreGBenbasatI (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research2(3): 192–222.
51.
NarasimhanRDasA (2000) An empirical examination of sourcing’s role in developing manufacturing flexibilities. International Journal of Production Research38(4): 875–893.
52.
NarasimhanRTalluriSDasA (2004) Exploring flexibility and execution competencies of manufacturing firms. Journal of Operations Management22: 91–106.
53.
OrlikowskiW (1992) The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science3(3): 398–427.
54.
PodsakoffPMackenzieSLeeJ, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
55.
PoppoLZhouKLiJ (2016) When can you trust “trust”? Calculative trust, relational trust, and supplier performance. Strategic Management Journal37(4): 724–741.
56.
PorterM (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. London: Collier Macmillan.
57.
PujawanN (2004) Assessing supply chain flexibility: a conceptual framework and case study. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management1(1): 79–97.
58.
RalstonPRicheyRGraweS (2017) The past and future of supply chain collaboration: a literature synthesis and call for research. International Journal of Logistics Management28(2): 508–530.
59.
RindfussRChoeMTsuyaN, et al. (2015) Do low survey response rates bias results? Evidence from Japan. Demographic Research32(6): 797–828.
60.
SanchezAMPerezMP (2005) Supply chain flexibility and firm performance. A conceptual model and empirical study in the automotive industry. International Journal of Operations and Production Management25 (7): 681–700.
61.
SeoJDinwoodieJKwakD (2014) The impact of innovativeness on supply chain performance: is supply chain integration a missing link?Supply Chain Management: An International Journal19(5/6): 733–746.
62.
ShortJKetchenDPalmerT (2002) The role of sampling in strategic management research on performance: a two-study analysis. Journal of Management28(3): 363–385.
63.
SlackN (2005) The changing nature of operations flexibility. International Journal of Operations and Production Management25(12): 1201–1210.
64.
SubramaniMVenkatramanN (2003) Safeguarding investments in asymmetric interorganizational relationships: theory and evidence. Academy of Management Review46(1): 46–62.
65.
SwaffordPGhoshSMurthyN (2006) A framework for assessing value chain agility. International Journal of Operations and Production Management26(2): 118–140.
66.
TangXRaiA (2012) The moderating effects of supplier portfolio characteristics on the competitive performance impacts of supplier-facing process capabilities. Journal of Operations Management30: 85–98.
TengSJaramilloH (2005) A model for evaluation and selection of suppliers in global textile and apparel supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management35(7): 503–523.
69.
TraceyMTanC (2001) Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement, customer satisfaction, and firm performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal6(4): 174–188.
70.
VenkatramanNGrantJ (1986) Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: a critique and proposal. Academy of Management Review11(1): 71–87.
71.
VickerySCalantoneRDrogeC (1999) Supply chain flexibility: an empirical study. Journal of Supply Chain Management35(2): 16–24.
72.
WagnerSBodeC (2014) Supplier relationship-specific investments and the role of safeguards for supplier innovation sharing. Journal of Operations Management32(3): 65–78.
73.
WeightC (2013) Leveraging supplier capabilities: the role of locus of capability deployment. Strategic Management Journal34(1): 1–21.
74.
WilliamsonO (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.
75.
YuYHuoB (2018) Supply chain quality integration: relational antecedents and operational consequences. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal23(3): 188–206.
76.
ZaheerAVenkatramanN (1994) Determinants of electronic integration in the insurance industry: an empirical test. Management Science40(5): 549–566.
