This study applies upper echelons theory associated with executive dismissal and power to examine the relationships of performance and four types of executive power—structural, prestige, expert, and governance concentration—with dismissal. Using the context of National Collegiate Athletic Association college basketball, in which coaches are completely responsible for strategies and human capital acquisition and retention, a curvilinear relationship between performance and dismissal is found. Significant relationships for prestige and expert power with dismissal are also found, but the “honeymoon period” is longer than prior studies of executive and coach dismissal have shown. Surprisingly, concentrated governance is found to be negatively associated with the likelihood of dismissal.
AllenWDChadwickC (2012) Performance, expectations, and managerial dismissal evidence from the National Football League. Journal of Sports Economics13(4): 337–363.
2.
AllisonPD (1984) Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
AmeduSDulewiczV (2018) The relationship between CEO personal power, CEO competencies, and company performance. Journal of General Management43(4): 188–198.
4.
BaileyEEHelfatCE (2003) External management succession, human capital, and firm performance: an integrative analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics24(4): 347–369.
5.
BennerMJTripsasM (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: the evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal33(3): 277–302.
6.
BernsJPGuptaVKSchnatterlyKA, et al. (2021) Chief executive officer dismissal: a multidisciplinary integration and critical analysis. Group & Organization Management46: 1–37.
7.
BernsKVKlarnerP (2017) A review of the CEO succession literature and a future research program. Academy of Management Perspectives31(2): 83–108.
8.
BlossfeldHGolschKRohwerG (2007) Event History Analysis with STATA. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
9.
BoekerW (1992) Power and managerial dismissal: scapegoating at the top. Administrative Science Quarterly37(3): 400–421.
10.
BoekerWGoodsteinJ (1993) Performance and successor choice: the moderating effects of governance and ownership. Academy of Management Journal36(1): 172–186.
11.
Box-SteffensmeierJMJonesBS (2004) Event History Modeling: A guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BrookmanJThistlePD (2009) CEO tenure, the risk of termination and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance15(3): 331–344.
13.
CoxDR (1972) Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological34(2): 187–202.
14.
DailyCMJohnsonJL (1997) Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: a longitudinal assessment. Journal of Management23(2): 97–117.
15.
EvansBPittsJD (2017) The determinants of NCAA basketball recruiting outcomes. Applied Economics Letters24(5): 351–354.
16.
FinkelsteinS (1992) Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal35(3): 505–538.
17.
FinkelsteinSD’AveniRA (1994) CEO duality as a double-edged sword: how boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal37(5): 1079–1108.
18.
FinkelsteinSHambrickDCannellaA (2009) Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
FizelJLD’ItriMP (1999) Firing and hiring of managers: does efficiency matter?Journal of Management25(4): 567–585.
20.
FlickingerMWrageMTuschkeA, et al. (2016) How CEOs protect themselves against dismissal: a social status perspective. Strategic Management Journal37(6): 1107–1117.
21.
ForemanJJSoebbingBP (2015) The role of candidate availability in CEO dismissals: an examination of the National Football League. Journal of Management16(2): 11–25.
22.
FredricksonJWHambrickDCBaumrinS (1988) A model of CEO dismissal. Academy of Management Review13(2): 255–270.
23.
FrickBSimmonsR (2008) The impact of managerial quality on organizational performance: evidence from German soccer. Managerial and Decision Economics29(7): 593–600.
24.
GiambatistaRC (2004) Jumping through hoops: a longitudinal study of leader life cycles in the NBA. Leadership Quarterly15(5): 607–624.
25.
Grabke-RundellAGomez-MejiaLR (2002) Power as a determinant of executive compensation. Human Resource Management Review12(1): 3–23.
26.
GraffinSDWardAJ (2010) Certifications and reputation: determining the standard of desirability amidst uncertainty. Organization Science21(2): 331–346.
27.
HaleblianJRajagopalanN (2006) A cognitive model of CEO dismissal: understanding the influence of board perceptions, attributions and efficacy beliefs. Journal of Management Studies43(5): 1009–1026.
28.
HambrickDCFukutomiGDS (1991) The seasons of a CEO’s tenure. Academy of Management Review16(4): 719–742.
29.
HambrickDCFinkelsteinSMooneyAC (2005) Executive job demands: new insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review30(3): 472–491.
30.
HaynesKTHillmanA (2010) The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal31(11): 1145–1163.
31.
HilgerSMankelSRichterA (2013) The use and effectiveness of top executive dismissal. Leadership Quarterly24(1): 9–28.
32.
HolmesP (2011) Win or go home: why college football coaches get fired. Journal of Sports Economics12(2): 157–178.
33.
HumphreysBPaulRWeinbachA (2016) Performance expectations and the tenure of head coaches: evidence from NCAA football. Research in Economics70(3): 482–492.
34.
KimY (1996) Long-term firm performance and chief executive turnover: an empirical study of the dynamics. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization12(2): 480–496.
35.
LajiliKLinLYHRostamkalaeiA (2020) Corporate governance, human capital resources, and firm performance: exploring the missing links. Journal of General Management45(4): 192–205.
36.
LukesS (1974) Power: A Radical View (Vol. 1). London: Macmillan.
37.
LusthausCAdrienMHAndersonG, et al. (1999) Enhancing Organizational Performance: A Toolbox for Self-Assessment. Montreal, QC: Universalia.
38.
McDonaldMLWestphalJD (2003) Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly48(1): 1–32.
39.
McHughML (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica22(3): 276–282.
40.
MeindlJREhrlichSBDukerichJM (1985) The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly30(1): 78–102.
41.
RindovaVPWilliamsonIOPetkovaAP, et al. (2005) Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal48(6): 1033–1049.
42.
SalancikGRPfefferJ (1980) Effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in US corporations. Academy of Management Journal23(4): 653–664.
43.
SchepkerDJKimYPatelPC, et al. (2017) CEO succession, strategic change, and post-succession performance: a meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly28(6): 701–720.
44.
ShenWCannellaAA (2002) Power dynamics within top management and their impacts on CEO dismissal followed by inside succession. Academy of Management Journal45(6): 1195–1206.
45.
VestalAGuidiceR (2019) The determinants and performance consequences of CEO strategic advice seeking. Journal of General Management44(4): 232–242.
46.
WangrowDBSchepkerDJBarkerVL (2018) Power, performance, and expectations in the dismissal of NBA coaches: a survival analysis study. Sport Management Review21(4): 333–346.
47.
ZhaoEYThatcherSMJehnKA (2019) Instigating, engaging in, and managing group conflict: a review of the literature addressing the critical role of the leader in group conflict. Academy of Management Annals13(1): 112–147.
