The purpose of this article is to explore shared service center (SSC) implementation. Shared service is a key concept by which corporations organize their resources. Research indicates that some organizations struggle with implementing SSC and sometimes entirely fail to implement them. Although prior research exploring the determinants of implementation success is relatively scarce, researchers have conducted several SSC implementation case studies. However, these valuable findings remain isolated in stand-alone case studies. We aggregated the results of these studies using a qualitative meta-synthesis to identify, extract, and synthesize variables, their interrelations, and their relationships to SSC success. The outcome is a theoretical model that describes which factors are important and how and why they are related to SSC success. Overall, we make important contributions to the growing SSC research by shedding theoretical light on SSC implementation. We also provide a set of propositions and make suggestions for future research.
AksinZMasiniA (2008) Effective strategies for internal outsourcing and offshoring of business services: an empirical investigation. Journal of Operations Management26(2): 239–256.
2.
AmiruddinRAmanAAuzairSM, et al. (2013) Mitigating risks in a shared service relationship: the case of a Malaysian bank. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management10(1): 78–93.
3.
ArmourHTeeceDJ (1978) Organizational structure and economic performance: a test of the multidivisional hypothesis. The Bell Journal of Economics9(1): 106–122.
BayesSEwensB (2017) Registered nurses’ experiences of caring for pregnant and postpartum women in general hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Nursing26(5–6): 599–608.
6.
BergeronB (2003) Essentials of Knowledge Management. Hoboken: Wiley.
7.
BharadwajAS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly24(1): 169–196.
8.
BoglindAHällsténFThilanderP (2011) HR transformation and shared services adoption and adaptation in Swedish organisations. Personnel Review40(5): 570–588.
9.
BondaroukTFriebeC-M (2014) Shared services? Standardization, formalization, and control: a structured literature review. In: BondaroukT (ed.) Shared Services as a New Organizational Form. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 39–65.
10.
BoyleTKumarVKumarU (2006) Determinants of integrated product development diffusion. R&D Management36(1): 37–54.
11.
BurnsTStalkerGM (1961) The Management of Innovation. Windermere, Florida: Travistock.
12.
Burton-JonesAMcLeanERMonodE (2015) Theoretical perspectives in IS research: from variance and process to conceptual latitude and conceptual fit. European Journal of Information Systems24(6): 664–679.
13.
ChaeH-CKohCPrybutokV. (2014) Information technology capability and firm performance: contradictory findings and their possible causes. MIS Quarterly, 38(1): 305–326.
14.
CollisD (1994) Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities?Strategic Management Journal15(S1): 143–152.
15.
CookeFL (2006) Modeling an HR shared services center: experience of an MNC in the United Kingdom. Human Resource Management45(2): 211–227.
16.
CraikeASinghPJ (2006) Shared services: a conceptual model for adoption, implementation and use. International Journal of Information System and Change Management1(3): 223–240.
17.
DaftR (1978) A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal21(2): 193–210.
18.
DavisT (2005) Integrating shared service with the strategy and operations of MNEs. Journal of General Management31(2): 1–17.
19.
DolleryBAkimovA (2008) Are shared services a panacea for Australian local government? A critical note on Australian and international empirical evidence. International Review of Public Administration12(2): 89–102.
20.
EdmondsonAMcManusS (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review32(4): 1246–1264.
21.
EisenhardtK (1989) Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
22.
FainshmidtSPezeshkanAFrazierL, et al. (2016) Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: a meta-analytic evaluation and extension. Journal of Management Studies53(8): 1348–1380.
23.
FarndaleEPaauweJHoeksemaL (2009) In-sourcing HR: shared service centres in the Netherlands. The International Journal of Human Resource Management20(3): 544–561.
24.
FieltEBandaraWMiskonS, et al. (2014) Exploring shared services from an IS perspective: a literature review and research agenda. Communications of the Association for Information Systems34(1): 1001–1040.
25.
Finfgeld-ConnettD (2010) Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings. Journal of Advanced Nursing66(2): 246–254.
26.
GohMPrakashSYeoR (2007) Resource-based approach to IT shared services in a manufacturing firm. Industrial Management & Data Systems107(2): 251–270.
27.
GospelHSakoM (2010) The unbundling of corporate functions: the evolution of shared services and outsourcing in human resource management. Industrial and Corporate Change19(5): 1367–1396.
28.
HabersangSKuberling-JostJReihlenM, et al. (2019) A process perspective on organizational failure: a qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies56(1): 19–56.
29.
HammellK (2006) Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord45(2): 124–139.
30.
HarleyGDowningC (2010) Embedding VAT reporting and compliance in a shared service centre environment. International Tax Review34–38.
31.
HarritzD (2016) Role of management devices in enacting strategy—case study of shared service centre. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change12(4): 504–521.
32.
HelfatCWinterS (2011) Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (n)ever-changing world. Strategic Management Journal32(11): 1243–1250.
33.
HelfatCFinkelsteinSMitchellW, et al. (2007) Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
34.
HelperSSakoM (2010) Management innovation in supply chain: appreciating Chandler in the twenty-first century. Industrial and Corporate Change19(2): 399–429.
35.
HerbertISealW (2012) Shared services as a new organisational form: some implications for management accounting. The British Accounting Review44(2): 83–97.
36.
HerbertISealW (2014). A knowledge management perspective to shared service centers: a case study of a finance SSC. In: BondaroukT (ed.) Shared Services as a New Organizational Form. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 133–151.
37.
HoonC (2013) Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies an approach to theory building. Organizational Research Methods16(4): 522–556.
38.
HuangR (2016) RQDA: R-based qualitative data analysis (version 0.2-8). Available at: http://rqda.r-forge.r-project.org/ (accessed 18 December 2019).
39.
IverothE (2011) The sociomaterial practice of IT-enabled change: a case study of a global transformation. Journal of Change Management11(3): 375–395.
40.
JanssenMJohaA (2006) Motives for establishing shared service centers in public administrations. International Journal of Information Management26(2): 102–115.
41.
JerebCKuchemRSohnW (2009) Shed light on the black box: how Deutsche Post DHL achieved global transparency over payroll processes. Strategic HR Review8(5): 23–31.
42.
JonesRJimmiesonNGriffithsA (2005) The impact of organizational culture and reshaping capabilities on change implementation success: the mediating role of readiness for change. Journal of Management Studies42(2): 361–386.
43.
KastbergG (2016) Trust and control in network relations: a study of a public sector setting. Financial Accountability & Management32(1): 33–56.
44.
KimSW (2018) Parental involvement in developing countries: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research. International Journal of Educational Development60: 149–156.
LacityMFoxJ (2008) Creating global shared services: lessons from Reuters. MIS Quarterly Executive7(1): 17–32.
47.
LangleyA (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review24(4): 691–710.
48.
LindvallJIverothE (2011) Creating a global network of shared service centres for accounting. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change7(3): 278–305.
49.
MaatmanMMeijerinkJ (2017) Why sharing is synergy: the role of decentralized control mechanisms and centralized HR capabilities in creating HR shared service value. Personnel Review46(7): 1297–1317.
50.
MaatmanMBondaroukTLooiseJ (2010) Conceptualising the capabilities and value creation of HRM shared service models. Human Resource Management Review20(4): 327–339.
51.
MakkonenHPohjolaMOlkkonenR, et al. (2014) Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis. Journal of Business Research67(1): 2707–2719.
52.
MataFFuerstWBarneyJ (1995) Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly19(4): 487–505.
53.
MayerRDavisJSchoormanF (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review20(3): 709–734.
54.
McCrackenMMcIvorR (2012) Transforming the HR function through outsourced shared services: insights from the public sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management24(8): 1685–1707.
55.
MeijerinkJBondaroukTMaatmanM (2013) Exploring and comparing HR shared services in subsidiaries of multinational corporations and indigenous organisations in the Netherlands: a strategic response analysis. European Journal of International Management7(4): 469–492.
56.
MeyerJSrinivasELalJ, et al. (2007) Employee commitment and support for an organizational change: test of the three-component model in two cultures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology80(2): 185–211.
57.
MilesMHubermanA (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
58.
MintzbergH (1979) The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research. New Jersey: Social Science Research Network.
59.
MiskonSFieltEBandaraW, et al. (2013) Towards a typology of structural arrangements for shared services: evidence from the higher education sector. Electronic Markets23(2): 149–162.
60.
MurrayGRentellPGeereD (2008) Procurement as a shared service in English local government. International Journal of Public Sector Management21(5): 540–555.
61.
National Audit Office (2011) Shared Services in the Research Councils, No. HC 1459, London, Great Britain: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
62.
OwensA (2013) Improving the performance of finance and accounting shared service centres. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems7(3): 250–261.
63.
PaagmanATateMFurtmuellerE, et al. (2015) An integrative literature review and empirical validation of motives for introducing shared services in government organizations. International Journal of Information Management35(1): 110–123.
64.
PierceJAguinisH (2013) The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management39(2): 313–338.
65.
RaudlaRTammelK (2015) Creating shared service centres for public sector accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal28(2): 158–179.
66.
RichterPBrühlR (2017) Shared service center research: a review of the past, present, and future. European Management Journal35(1): 26–38.
67.
RichterPBrühlR (2019) Ahead of the game: antecedents for the success of shared service centers. European Management Journal. Epub ahead of print 31 October 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.10.006.
68.
SakoMHelperS (1998) Determinants of trust in supplier relations: evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization34(3): 387–417.
69.
SandelowskiMDochertySEmdenC (1997) Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health20(4): 365–371.
70.
SchilkeOGoerzenA (2010) Alliance management capability: an investigation of the construct and its measurement. Journal of Management36(5): 1192–1219.
71.
SchilkeOHuSHelfatC (2017) Quo Vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. Academy of Management Annals12(1): 390–439.
72.
SchneiderCWagemannC (2012) Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: University Press.
73.
SchoormanFMayerRDavisJ (2007) An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review32(2): 344–354.
74.
SchulzVBrennerW (2010) Characteristics of shared service centers. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy4: 210–219.
75.
SealWHerbertI (2013) Shared service centres and the role of the finance function: Advancing the iron cage?Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change9(2): 188–205.
SeldenSWootersR (2011) Structures in public human resource management shared services in state governments. Review of Public Personnel Administration31(4): 349–368.
78.
SheehanNFossN (2017) Using Porterian activity analysis to understand organizational capabilities. Journal of General Management42(3): 41–51.
79.
SiauKLongY (2005) Synthesizing e-government stage models—a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems105(4): 443–458.
80.
TeeceD (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal28(13): 1319–1350.
TurnerDCrawfordM (1998) Change Power: Capabilities That Drive Corporate Renewal. Chichester, UK: Allen & Unwin.
83.
UlbrichF (2006) Improving shared service implementation: adopting lessons from the BPR movement. Business Process Management Journal12(2): 191–205.
84.
UlbrichF (2010) Deploying centres of excellence in government agencies. Electronic Government, An International Journal7(4): 362–379.
85.
WilligCWirthL (2018) A meta-synthesis of studies of patients’ experience of living with terminal cancer. Health Psychology37(3): 228–237.
86.
WinterT. (2017). “Shared Service Center”: “Es liegt nicht an den Kollegen in Rumänien”. FAZ.NET. Available at: http://www.faz.net/1.4945597(accessed 15 January 2020).
87.
YahyapourSShamizanjaniMMosakhaniM (2015) A conceptual breakdown structure for knowledge management benefits using meta-synthesis method. Journal of Knowledge Management19(6): 1295–1309.
88.
YinRK (2013) Case Study Research: Design and Methods: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
89.
YusofAMiskonSIahadN, et al. (2016) Drivers influencing shared services adoption. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology90(1): 93.
90.
ZardiniARossignoliCRicciardiF (2016) A bottom-up path for IT management success: from infrastructure quality to competitive excellence. Journal of Business Research69(5): 1747–1752.
91.
ZottC (2003) Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strategic Management Journal24(2): 97–125.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
