Given the conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study examines the moderating effects of intimidation and recognition on the relationship between abusive supervision and a subordinate's job tension, emotional exhaustion, and turnover intention. Consistent with past research, the study found a positive relationship between abusive supervision and negative employee outcomes. However, regardless of the strong theoretical and empirical literature support for the moderating effects of intimidation and recognition on the direct relationship of abusive supervision and negative employee outcomes, empirical data did not reveal any moderating effects of the moderating variables, neither as a single construct nor as a combined construct. For the study, data has been collected through a convenient sampling technique from 443 professional employees in the telecommunications sector in Pakistan. The study contributes to the literature by focusing on the largely ignored subordinate's impression management tactic (e.g. intimidation) and the top management's recognition of the subordinate's job, on the relationship between abusive supervision and negative employee outcomes. Theoretical contributions and practical implications are discussed in the conclusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbatecolaG. (2013), Survival or failure within the organisational life cycle. What lessons for managers,Journal of General Management, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 23–38.
2.
AbrahamR. (1998), Emotional dissonance in organizations: antecedents, consequences, and moderators,Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, Vol. 124 No. 2, pp. 1–229.
3.
AlexanderJ. A., BloomJ. R., and NucholsB. A. (1994), Nursing Turnover and Hospital Efficiency: An Organization-Level Analysis,Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 505–520.
4.
AryeeS., Li-YunS., Zhen XiongC., and DebrahY. A. (2008), Abusive supervision and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure,Management and Organization Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 393–411.
5.
AshforthB. (1994), Petty tyranny in organizations,Human Relations, Vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 755–778.
6.
AshforthB. (1997), Petty Tyranny in Organizations: A Preliminary Examination of Antecedents and Consequences,Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration/Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 126–140.
7.
BambergerP. A., and BacharachS. B. (2006), Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account, Human Relations, Vol. 59, No. 6, pp. 723–752.
8.
BarnesW. F., and JonesE. B. (1974), Differences in male and female quitting, Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 439–451.
9.
BarneyJ. (1991), Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99–120.
10.
BarneyJ. (2000), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 203–227.
11.
BeugréC. D. (2011), Repairing injustice in organisations: beyond social accounts, Journal of General Management, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 47–63.
12.
BiesR. J., and TrippT. M. (2005), The Study of Revenge in the Workplace: Conceptual, Ideological, and Empirical Issues, in FoxS., and SpectorP. E. (eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets, pp. 65–81, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
BishopJ. (1987), The recognition and reward of employee performance, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 36–56.
14.
BlauP. M. (1964), Exchange and power in social life, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
15.
BlumbergS. (2005), Foodservice employee recognition programs, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Vol. 105, No. 7, pp. 1055–1056.
16.
BolinoM. C., KacmarK. M., TurnleyW. H., and GilstrapJ. B. (2008), A Multi-Level Review of Impression Management Motives and Behaviors, Journal of Management, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1080–1109.
17.
BolinoM. C., and TurnleyW. H. (1999), Measuring impression management in organizations: A scale development based on the Jones and Pittman taxonomy, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 187–206.
18.
BowlingN. A., and MichelJ. S. (2011), Why do you treat me badly? The role of attributions regarding the cause of abuse in subordinates' responses to abusive supervision, Work and Stress, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 309–320.
19.
BreauxD. M., PerrewéP. L., HallA. T., FrinkD. D., and HochwarterW. A. (2008), Time to try a little tenderness? The detrimental effects of accountability when coupled with abusive supervision, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 111–122.
20.
BurrisE. R., DetertJ. R., and ChiaburuD. S. (2008), Quitting Before Leaving: The Mediating Effects of Psychological Attachment and Detachment on Voice, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 912–922.
21.
BurtC. (1948), The Factorial Study of Temperamental Traits, British Journal of Psychology-Statistical Section, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 178–203.
22.
BurtonJ., and HooblerJ. (2011), Aggressive reactions to abusive supervision: The role of interactional justice and narcissism, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 389–398.
23.
BurtonW. H. (1930), Supervision, The American Journal of Nursing, Vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 1045–1052.
24.
CallanL. B. (1970), Supervision, the Key to Success With Aides, Public Health Reports, Vol. 85, No. 9, pp. 780–787.
25.
CangelosiJ. D., MarkhamF. S., and BoundsW. T. (1998), Factors related to nurse retention and turnover: an updated study, Health Marketing Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 25–43.
26.
CarlsonD., FergusonM., HunterE., and WhittenD. (2012), Abusive supervision and work-family conflict: The path through emotional labor and burnout, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 849–859.
27.
CarlsonD., FergusonM., PerrewéP. L., and WhittenD. (2011), The fallout from abusive supervision: An examination of subordinates and their partners, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 937–961.
ChernissC. (1980), Staff burnout: Job stress in the human services, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage publications.
30.
ChiS.-C.S., and LiangS.-G. (2013), When do subordinates' emotion-regulation strategies matter? Abusive supervision, subordinates' emotional exhaustion, and work withdrawal, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 125–137.
31.
ChisholmR. F., KaslS. V., and EskenaziB. (1983), The Nature and Predictors of Job Related Tension in a Crisis Situation: Reactions of Nuclear Workers to the Three Mile Island Accident, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 385–405.
32.
CropanzanoR., RuppD. E., and ByrneZ. S. (2003), The Relationship of Emotional Exhaustion to Work Attitudes, Job Performance, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 160–169.
33.
DemeroutiE., BakkerA. B., and BultersA. J. (2004), The loss spiral of work pressure, work-home interference and exhaustion: Reciprocal relations in a three-wave study, Journal of vocational behavior, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 131–149.
34.
DemeroutiE., BakkerA. B., NachreinerF., and SchaufeliW. B. (2001), The job demands-resources model of burnout, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 499–512.
35.
DuffyE., MichelleK., GansterD. C., and PagonM. (2002), Social Undermining in the Workplace, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 331–351.
36.
Francis-SmytheJ., RobinsonL., and RossC. (2013), The role of evidence in general managers' decision-making, Journal of General Management, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 3–21.
37.
GallagherV. C., HarrisK. J., and ValleM. (2008), Understanding the use of intimidation as a response to job tension: Career implications for the global leader, Career Development International, Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 648–666.
38.
GarciaP. R. J. M., WangL., LuV., KiazadK., and RestubogS. L. D. (2015), When victims become culprits: The role of subordinates' neuroticism in the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 72, No. 0, pp. 225–229.
39.
GouldnerA. W. (1960), The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement, American sociological review, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 161–178.
40.
GreenbergM. S. (1980), A theory of indebtedness, in GergenM. S. G. K., and WillisR. (eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 3–26), New York, NY: Plenum Press.
41.
GriffethR. W., HomP. W., and GaertnerS. (2000), A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium, Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 463–488.
42.
HaggardD., RobertC., and RoseA. (2011), Co-rumination in the Workplace: Adjustment Trade-offs for Men and Women Who Engage in Excessive Discussions of Workplace Problems, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 27–40.
43.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B., NeveuJ.-P., Paustian-UnderdahlS. C., and WestmanM. (2014), Getting to the COR understanding the role of resources in Conservation of Resources theory, Journal of Management, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 1334–1364.
44.
HarrisK. J., GallagherV. C., and RossiA. M. (2013), Impression Management (IM) Behaviors, IM Culture, and Job Outcomes, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 154–171.
45.
HarrisK. J., HarveyP., and KacmarK. M. (2011), Abusive supervisory reactions to coworker relationship conflict, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 1010–1023.
46.
HarveyP., StonerJ., HochwarterW., and KacmarC. (2007), Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 264–280.
47.
HobfollS. E. (1989), Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress,American psychologist, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 513–524.
48.
HobmanE. V., RestubogS. L. D., BordiaP., and TangR. L. (2009), Abusive Supervision in Advising Relationships: Investigating the Role of Social Support,Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 233–256.
49.
HouseR. J., and RizzoJ. R. (1972), Toward the measurement of organizational practices: Scale development and validation,Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 56,No. 5, pp. 388–396.
50.
JonesE. E. (1990), Interpersonal perception, New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
51.
JonesE. E., and PittmanT. S. (1982), Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation, in SulsJ. (ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 231–262), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52.
KangJ. H., and JensenJ. M. (2009), Cultural Matters in Entrepreneurial Firms: Abusive Supervision and its Consequences, in Washington: ICSB World Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-26), January 2009, Seoul, South Korea. Available from http://search.proquest.com/docview/192410641?accountid=12528 [Accessed: 11/06/2014].
53.
KeashlyL., HunterS., and HarveyS. (1997), Abusive interaction and role state stressors: Relative impact on student residence assistant stress and work attitudes, Work and Stress, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 175–185.
54.
KernanM. C., WatsonS., ChenF. F., and KimT. G. (2011), How cultural values affect the impact of abusive supervision on worker attitudes, Cross Cultural Management, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 464–484.
55.
KhanS. N., QureshiI. M., and AhmadH. I. (2010), Abusive Supervision and Negative Employee Outcomes, European journal of social sciences, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 490–500.
56.
KiewitzC., RestubogS. L. D., ZagenczykT. J., ScottK. D., GarciaP. R. J. M., and TangR. L. (2012), Sins of the parents: Self-control as a buffer between supervisors' previous experience of family undermining and subordinates' perceptions of abusive supervision, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 869–882.
57.
Li-QunW. (2013), The impact of human resource management practices in the entrepreneurial process Evidence from China, Journal of General Management, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 73–89.
58.
LinW., WangL., and ChenS. (2013), Abusive Supervision and Employee Well-Being: The Moderating Effect of Power Distance Orientation, Applied Psychology, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 308–329.
59.
MackeyJ. D., EllenB. P., HochwarterW. A., and FerrisG. R. (2013), Subordinate social adaptability and the consequences of abusive supervision perceptions in two samples, Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 732–746.
60.
MaslachC. (1982), Burnout. the cost of caring, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
61.
MaslachC., and JacksonS. E. (1981), The measurement of experienced burnout, Journal of Occupational Behavior, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 99–113.
62.
MelamedS., ShiromA., TokerS., BerlinerS., and ShapiraI. (2006), Burnout and risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence, possible causal paths, and promising research directions, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 132, No. 3, pp. 327–353.
63.
MereczD., DrabekM., and MoscickaA. (2009), Aggression at the workplace – Psychological consequences of abusive encounter with coworkers and clients, International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 243–260.
64.
MitchellM. S., and AmbroseM. L. (2012), Employees' Behavioral Reactions to Supervisor Aggression: An Examination of Individual and Situational Factors, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 97, No. 6, pp. 1148–1170.
65.
NandkeolyarA. K., ShafferJ. A., LiA., EkkiralaS., and BaggerJ. (2014), Surviving an abusive supervisor: The joint roles of conscientiousness and coping strategies, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 99, No. 1, pp. 138–150.
66.
NeumanJ., and BaronR. (1998), Workplace voilence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential csuses, and preferred targets, Journal of Management, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 391–419.
67.
PodsakoffP. M., TodorW. D., GroverR. A., and HuberV. L. (1984), Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: fact or fiction?, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 21–63.
68.
RahimicZ., and KovacevicJ. (2009), The Leader-Member Exchange in Teams of B & H Companies, Odnosi Lidera I Sljedbenika U Timovima Bosanskohercegovackih Kompanija, Vol. 29, pp. 89–104.
69.
SchatA., DesmaraisS., and KellowayE. (2006), Exposure to workplace aggression from multiple sources: Validation of a measure and test of a model, Unpublished manuscript, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
70.
SkarlickiD. P., FolgerR., and TeslukP. (1999), Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 100–108.
71.
SoltisS. M., AgneessensF., SasovovaZ., and LabiancaG. (2013), A Social Network Perspective on Turnover Intentions: The Role of Distributive Justice and Social Support, Human Resource Management, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 561–584.
72.
StreetH., SheeranP., and OrbellS. (2001), Exploring the relationship between different psychosocial determinants of depression: A multidimensional scaling analysis, Journal of affective disorders, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 53–67.
73.
SuleaC., FineS., FischmannG., SavaF. A., and DumitruC. (2013), Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effects of personality, Journal of Personnel Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 196–200.
74.
TarisT. W. (2006), Is there a relationship between burnout and objective performance? A critical review of 16 studies, Work and Stress, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 316–334.
75.
TaylorS. E., KleinL. C., LewisB. P., GruenewaldT. L., GurungR. A., and UpdegraffJ. A. (2000), Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight, Psychological review, Vol. 107, No. 3, pp. 411–429.
76.
TepperB. J. (2000), Consequences of abusive supervision, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 178–190.
77.
TepperB. J. (2007), Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda.Journal of Management, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 261–289.
78.
TepperB. J., CarrJ. C., BreauxD. M., GeiderS., HuC., and HuaW. (2009), Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees' workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysis, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 109, No. 2, pp. 156–167.
79.
TepperB. J., DuffyM. K., HenleC. A., and LambertL. S. (2006), Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 101–123.
80.
TepperB. J., DuffyM. K., and ShawJ. D. (2001), Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates' resistance, The Journal Of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 5, pp. 974–983.
81.
TepperB. J., MossS. E., and DuffyM. K. (2011), Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissmiliarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 279–294.
82.
TepperB. J., MossS. E., LockhartD. E., and CarrJ. C. (2007), Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates' psychological distress, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 1169–1180.
83.
TepperB. J., Uhl-BienM., KohutG. F., RogelbergS. G., LockhartD. E., and EnsleyM. D. (2006), Subordinates' Resistance and Managers' Evaluations of Subordinates' Performance, Journal of Management, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 185–209.
84.
WayneS. J., ShoreL. M., BommerW. H., and TetrickL. E. (2002), The Role of Fair Treatment and Rewards in Perceptions of Organizational Support and Leader-Member Exchange, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 590–598.
85.
WayneS. J., ShoreL. M., and LidenR. C. (1997), Perceived Organizational Support And Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 82–111.
86.
WeiF., and SiS. (2013), Tit for tat? Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating effects of locus of control and perceived mobility, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 281–296.
87.
WheelerA. R., HalbeslebenJ. R. B., and WhitmanM. V. (2013), The interactive effects of abusive supervision and entitlement on emotional exhaustion and coworker abuse, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 4, pp. 477–496.
88.
WrightT. A., and CropanzanoR. (1998), Emotional exhaustion as a predictor of job performance and voluntary turnover, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83, No. 3, pp. 486–493.
89.
WuT.-Y., and HuC. (2009), Abusive Supervision and Employee Emotional Exhaustion: Dispositional Antecedents and Boundaries, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 143–169.
90.
XuE., HuangX., LamC. K., and MiaoQ. (2012), Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 531–543.
91.
ZellarsK. L., TepperB. J., and DuffyM. K. (2002), Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 1068–1076.
