In this article, the authors look at the role of culture, management theory and paradigm-shift vis-à-vis their implications for general management. There is an in-depth focus on the influence of the European Enlightenment on eighteenth and nineteenth century industrialism and the emergence of a possibly dominant paradigm in management theory in the twentieth century, namely ‘Scientific Management’ or ‘Taylorism’, as it became known. The authors also examine, in turn, how it shaped the next development in the narrative – ‘Human Relations’ – and its successors ‘Organisational Behaviour’ and ‘Human Resource Management’.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerP. S. (2003), ‘Toward Collaborative Interdependence: A Century of Change in the Organization of Work’, in KaufmanB. E., BeaumontR. A., and HelfgottR. B. (eds.), Industrial Relations to Human Resources and Beyond: The Evolving Process of Employee Relations Management.Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp, pp. 353–399.
2.
AitkinH. G.J. (2014), Scientific Management in Action: Taylorism at Watertown Arsenal, 1908– 1915, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BarleyS. R., and KundaG. (1992), ‘Design and Devotion: Surges of Rational and Normative Ideologies of Control in Managerial Discourse’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 363–99.
4.
BeynonH., and NicholsT. (eds.) (2006), The Fordism of Ford and Modern Management: Fordism and Post-Fordism,2 Vols., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
5.
BlaugM. (1975), ‘Kuhn Versus Lakatos or Paradigms Versus Research Programmes in the History of Economies’, in LatsisS.J. (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics, pp. 149–180, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BruceK., and NylandC. (2012), ‘The Demonization of Scientific Management and the Deification of Human Relations’, in LichtensteinN. (ed.), The American Right and U.S. Labor Politics, Ideology, and Imagination, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
7.
CaldariK. (2007), ‘Alfred Marshall's Critical Analysis of Scientific Management’, European Journal of History of Economic Thought, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 55–78.
8.
ChandlerA. D.Jr. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
9.
ChenC., and LeeY. (2008), Leadership and Management in China: Philosophies, Theories and Practices, Paris: Lavoisier.
10.
ChenH. C. (1911), The Economic Principles of Confucius and His School, New York, NY: Longmans, Green & Co.; re-published Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2002, with an introduction by M. Witzel.
11.
ChenM. (1995), Asian Management Systems, London and New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
ChhokarJ. S. (eds.) (2007), Culture and Leadership Across the World: The GLOBE Book of In-Depth Studies of 25 Societies, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
ChildJ. (1968), British Management Thought: A Critical Analysis, London: Allen and Unwin, re-published London and New York, NY: Routledge, 2012.
14.
ClarkeJ. J. (2000), The Tao of the West: Western Transformations of Taoist Thought, London and New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
CoatsA. W. (1969), ‘Is There a “Structure of Scientific Revolutions” in Economics?’, Kyklos, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 289–96.
16.
ConradS. (2012), ‘Enlightenment in Global History: A historiographical critique’, American Historical Review, Vol. 117, No. 4, pp. 999–1027.
17.
ContiR. F. (2013) ‘Frederick Winslow Taylor’, in WitzelM., and WarnerM. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Management Theorists, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 11–31.
18.
ContiR. F., and WarnerM. (1994), ‘Taylorism, teams and technology in ‘reengineering’ work-organization’, New Technology, Work and Employment, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 93–102.
19.
ContiR. F., and WarnerM. (1996), ‘Technology, teams and theories of the firm’, Human Systems Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 101–112.
20.
DroriG., and ErezM. (2009), ‘Macro and Micro Processes in the Culture of Organizations: Proposed Model for Studying Global Work’, Conference Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Hilton San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 8 August, 2009.
21.
DrummondH. (1995), ‘Beyond Quality’, Journal of General Management, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 68–77.
22.
DarwinC. (1859), On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, London: John Murray.
23.
DevinatP. (1927), Scientific Management in Europe, Geneva: International Labour Office.
24.
DickensC. (1854), Hard Times, London: Bradbuiy & Evans.
25.
DouglasM. (1986), How Institutions Think, Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
26.
DouglasM. (1992), Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory, London: Routledge.
27.
DouglasM., and WildavskyA. (1982), Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28.
FullerS. (2000), Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
GayP. (1966), The Enlightenment: An Interpretation, New York, NY: Knopf.
30.
GeorgeC. S. (1972), The History of Management Thought, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
GilbrethF., and GilbrethL. M. (1911), Motion Study, New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
32.
GreenwoodR. G., and RossR. H. (1982), ‘Early American Influence on Japanese Management Philosophy: The Scientific Management Movement in Japan’, in LeeS. M., and SchwendimanG. (eds.), Management by Japanese Systems, New York, NY: Praeger, pp. 43–54.
33.
GuillénM. (2006), The Taylorized Beauty of the Mechanical: Scientific Management and the Rise of Modern Architecture, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
HampsonN. (1968), The Enlightenment, London: Penguin.
35.
HansN. A. (1966) New Trends in Education in the Eighteenth Century, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
36.
HassardJ., and CoxJ. W. (2013), ‘Can Sociological Paradigms Still Inform Organizational Analysis? A Paradigm Model for Post-Paradigm Times,’Organization Studies, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 1701–1728.
37.
HendryJ. (1995), ‘Competing Strategy Programmes’, Journal of General Management, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 31–39.
38.
HendryJ. (1999), ‘Cultural Theory and Contemporary Management Organization’, Human Relations, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 557–577.
39.
HobsbawmE. J. (1987), The Age of Empire: 1875–1914, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
40.
HofstedeG. (1980), Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
HofstedeG. (1991), Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, London: McGraw-Hill.
42.
HouseR. J. (eds.) (2004), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
HudsonG. F. (1931), Europe and China, London: Edward Arnold.
44.
HumphreysG. G. (1986), Taylorism in France 1904–1920: The Impact of Scientific Management on Factory Relations and Society, New York, NY: Garland.
45.
JiaL., YouS., and DuY. (2011), ‘Chinese Context and Theoretical Contributions to Management Research: A Three-Decade Review’, Management and Organization Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 173–209.
46.
KakarS. (1970), Frederick Taylor: A Study in Personality and Innovation., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
KanigelR. (1997), The One Best Way: Frederick Taylor and the Enigma of Efficiency, New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
48.
KaufmanB. E., BeaumontR. A., & HelfgottR. B. (eds.) (2003), Balancing the Interests: The Evolution from Industrial Relations to Human Resources and Beyond, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp.
49.
KaufmanB. E. (2008), Paradigms in Industrial Relations: Original, Modern and Versions In-between, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 314–339.
50.
KaufmanB. E. (2014), ‘The historical development of American HRM broadly viewed’, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 196–218.
51.
KoontzH. (1961), ‘The management theory jungle’, The Journal of the Academy of Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 174–188.
52.
KotterJ. P. (1990), A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management, New York, NY: Free Press.
53.
LansburyR. (1976), ‘Generalist versus Specialist in an era of change’, Journal of General Management, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 55–70.
54.
LockeE. A. (1982), ‘The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An Evaluation’, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 14–24.
55.
MaddisonA. (2007), Contours of the World Economy, 1–2030 AD, Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56.
MarsG. (2008), ‘Corporate cultures and the use of space: an approach from Cultural Theory Corporate cultures and the use of space: an approach from Cultural Theory’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 185–204.
57.
MarshallA. (1919), Industry and Trade, London: Macmillan.
58.
MarxK. (1987) [1859], A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, contained in the Collected Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels: Volume 29, New York, NY: International Publishers, pp. 257–417.
59.
MarxK. (1990) [1867], Capital, Volume I, transl. Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin.
60.
MerkleJ. (1980), Management and Ideology: The Legacy of the International Scientific Management Movement, Berkeley: University of California Press.
61.
MokyrJ. (2007), ‘The European Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, and Modern Economic Growth?’,Max Weber Lecture, European University, Florence.
62.
MooreK., and LewisD. (2009), The Origins of Globalization, London and New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
MorganS. L. (2006), ‘Transfer of Taylorist Ideas to China, 1910–1930’, Journal of Management History, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 408–24.
64.
MumfordL. (1934), Technics and Civilization, London: Routledge.
65.
NeedhamJ. (1969a), The Grand Titration: Science and Society in East and West, London: Allen & Unwin.
66.
NeedhamJ. (1969b), Within the Four Seas: The Dialogue of East and West-, London: Allen & Unwin.
67.
NelsonD. (ed.) (1995), A Mental Revolution: Scientific Management Since Taylor, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
68.
NorthD. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69.
NylandC., BruceK., and BurnsP. (2014), ‘Taylorism, the International Labour Organization, and the Genesis and Diffusion of Codetermination’, Organization Studies, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 1149–1169.
70.
OutramD. (1999), The Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
PollardS. (1965), The Genesis of Modern Management, London: Penguin.
72.
PorterR. (2000), Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation of the Modern World, London: Penguin.
73.
RarickC. A., and GallagherC. A. (2000), ‘Confucius: The Forgotten Management Theorist’, Journal of Business Perspective, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 1–4.
74.
RindovaV. P., and StarbuckW. H. (1997), ‘Ancient Chinese Theories of Control’, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 144–59.
75.
SimhaA., and LemakD. J. (2010), ‘The value of original source readings in management education: The case of Frederick Winslow Taylor’, Journal of Management History, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 233–252.
76.
SmithA. (1977) [1776], An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
77.
StiglitzJ. (2011), ‘Rethinking Macro-Economics: What Failed and How to Repair It’, Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 591–645.
78.
SpenderJ. C., and KijneH. (eds.) (1996), Scientific Management: Frederick Winslow Taylor's Gift to the World?, Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
79.
TaylorF. W. (1895), A Piece-Pate System, New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; reprinted Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2000.
80.
TaylorF. W. (1903), Shop Management, New York, NY: Harper & Bros.
81.
TaylorF. W. (1911), The Principles of Scientific Management, New York, NY: Harper & Bros reprinted Stilwell, KS: Digireads.com.
82.
TowneH. R. (1886), ‘The Engineer as an Economist’, Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 428–32.
83.
UglowJ. (2002), The Lunar Men: The Friends Who Made the Future, London: Faber & Faber.
84.
UrwickL. F. (1956), The Golden Book of Management, London: Newman Neame.
85.
Wagner-TsukamotoS. (2008), ‘Scientific Management revisited: Did Taylorism fail because of a too positive image of human nature?’, Journal of Management History, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 348–372.
86.
WarnerM. (1994), ‘Japanese Culture, Western Management: Taylorism and Human Resources in Japan’, Organization Studies, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 509–35.
87.
WarnerM. (ed.) (2011), Confucian HRM in Greater China: Theory and Practice, London, NY and New York: Routledge.
88.
WarnerM. (2014), Understanding Management in China: Past, Present and, Future, London and New York, NY: Routledge.
89.
WarnerM., and NankervisA. (2012), ‘HRM Practices in Chinese MNCs: Rhetoric and Reality’, Journal of General Management, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 61–80.
90.
WebbS., and WebbB. (1897), Industrial Democracy, London: Longmans.
91.
WebbS. (1918), The Works Manager To-Day, London: Longmans, Green & Co.
92.
WeberM. (1964), The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism, transl. H. H. Gerth, London: Collier Macmillan.
93.
WeberM. (2002), The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit of Capitalism, transl. P. Baehr and G. C. Wells, London: Penguin.
94.
WitzelM. (2012), A History of Management Thought, London and New York, NY: Routledge.
95.
WitzelM. (2012), ‘The Leadership Philosophy of Han Fei’,Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 489–503.
96.
WitzelM., and WarnerM. (2013), ‘Introduction’, in WitzelM., and WarnerM. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Management Theorists, Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–10.
97.
WoklerR. (1998), ‘Enlightenment, Continental’, in E. Craig (ed.),Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, London and New York, NY: Routledge, Vol. 3, pp. 315–20.
98.
WrenD. (1980), Scientific Management in the U.S.S.R.Academy of Management Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 1–11.
99.
WrenD. (1994), The Evolution of Management Thought (4th edn.), New York, NY: John Wiley.
100.
WregeC. D., and GreenwoodR. G. (1991), Frederick W. Taylor, the Father of Scientific Management: Myth and Reality, Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin.
