Arthaud-DayM. L.CertoS. T.DaltonC. M. and DaltonD. R. (2006), ‘A changing of the guard: Executive and director turnover following corporate financial restatements’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, pp. 1119–1136.
2.
BeugréC. D. (2005), ‘Understanding injustice-related aggression in organisations: A cognitive model’, International Journal of Human Resources Management, Vol. 1, No. 7, pp. 1120–1136.
3.
BiesR. J. (1987), ‘The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage’, in: CummingsL. L. and StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organisational Behavior, pp. 289–319, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4.
BiesR. J. and ShapiroD. L. (1987), ‘Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts’, Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, pp. 199–216.
5.
BiesR. J.ShapiroD. L. and CummingsL. L. (1988), ‘Causal accounts and managing organisational conflict: Is it enough to say it’s not my fault?’, Communication Research, Vol. 15, pp. 381–399.
6.
BobocelR. D. and FarrellA. (1996), ‘Sex-based promotion decisions and interactional fairness: Investigating the influence of managerial accounts’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81, pp. 22–35.
7.
BobocelR. D. and ZdaniukA. (2005), ‘The role of explanations in the perception of workplace fairness’, in: GreenbergJ. and ColquittJ. (eds.), The handbook of organisational justice, pp. 469–498, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
BottomW. P.GibsonK.DanielsS. E. and MurnighanJ. K. (2002), ‘When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in rebuilding cooperation’, Organisation Science, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 498–513.
9.
ColquittJ. A. and CherkoffJ. M. (2002), ‘Explaining injustice: The interactive effect of explanation and outcome on fairness perceptions and task motivation’, Journal of Management, Vol. 28, pp. 591–610.
10.
CropanzanoR.BowenD. E. and GillilandS. W. (2007), ‘The management of organizational justice’, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 34–48.
11.
DalyJ. P. (1995), ‘Explaining changes to employees: The influence of justifications and change outcomes on employees’ fairness judgments’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 31, pp. 415–428.
12.
DarleyJ. M. and PittmanT. S. (2003), ‘The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 324–336.
13.
DiMaggioP. J. and PowellW. W. (1983), ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, pp. 147–160.
14.
DirksK. T.LewickiR. J. and ZaheerA. (2009), ‘Repairing relationships within and between organisations: Building a conceptual foundation’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34, pp. 68–84.
15.
FehrR. and GelfandJ. M. (2010), ‘When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims’ self-construals facilitates forgiveness’, Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 113, pp. 37–50.
16.
GreenbergJ. (1990), ‘Looking fair versus being fair: managing impressions of organizational justice’, Research in Organisational Behavior, Vol. 12, pp. 111–157.
17.
KellermanB. (2006), ‘When should leaders apologize and when not?’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 72–81.
18.
KimP. H.DirksK. T.CooperC. D. and FerrinD. L. (2006), ‘When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence vs. integrity-based trust violation’, Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 99, pp. 49–65.
19.
KimP. H.FerrinD. L.CooperC. D. and DirksK. T. (2004), ‘Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence versus integrity-based trust violations’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89, pp. 104–118.
20.
KramerR. M. and LewickiR. J. (2010), ‘Repairing and enhancing trust: Approaches to reducing organisational trust deficits’, The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 245–277.
21.
OhbuchiK.KamedaM. and AgarieN. (1989), ‘Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 56, pp. 219–227.
22.
RenH. and GrayB. (2009), ‘Repairing relationship conflict: How violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34, pp. 105–126.
23.
SchroederD. A.SteelJ. E.WoodelA. I. and BembenekA. F. (2003), ‘Justice within social dilemmas’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 374–387.
24.
SchlenkerB. R.PontariB. A. and ChristopherA. N. (2001), ‘Excuses and character: Personal and social implications of excuses’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5, pp. 15–32.
25.
ScottM. B. and LymanS. M. (1968), ‘Accounts’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 33, pp. 46–62.
26.
ShapiroD. L. (1991), ‘The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, pp. 614–630.
27.
SitkinS. B. and RothN. L. (1993), ‘Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic ‘remedies’ for trust/distrust’, Organisation Science, Vol. 4, pp. 367–392.
28.
SnyderC. R. and HigginsR. L. (1988), ‘Excuses: Their effective role in the negotiations of reality’, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 23–35.
29.
SuchmanM. C. (1995), ‘Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, pp. 571–610.
30.
TedeschiJ. T. and NormanN. (1985), ‘Social power, self-presentation and the self, in: Schlenker, B. R. (ed.), The self and social life, pp. 293–322, New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
TomlinsonE. C.DineenB. R. and LewickiR. J. (2004), ‘The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise’, Journal of Management, Vol. 30, pp. 165–187.
32.
TylerR. T.BoeckmannR. J.SmithJ. H.HuoY. J. (1997), Social justice in a diverse society, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.