European Commission directives for the liberalisation and deregulation of the European electricity industry were adopted almost at the same time in several nations. But each country had specific market structures and internal conditions. The aim of this paper is to analyse descriptively if and how differences between the home countries of European electricity firms affected, quantitatively and/or qualitatively, their diversification strategies after liberalisation. Research consisted of collecting and analysing data on the strategic actions of the main European electricity firms. The analysis covers a period often years (1998–2007), i.e. the first ten years after the first European directive. This paper sheds light on the link between pre-liberalisation specificities and attributes of a national electricity market and the post-liberalisation diversification strategy of its national electricity companies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersenT. J. (1999), ‘Strategizing in the New Competitive Energy Market’,The electricity Journal, August/September, pp. 42–48.
2.
AnsoffI. (1957), ‘Strategies for diversification’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 35, Issue 5, pp. 113–124.
3.
AnsoffI. (1965), Corporate Strategy. An analytical approach to business policy for growth and expansion, New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
DelmasM., RussoM., and MontesM. (2007), ‘Deregulation and Environmental Differentiation in the Electric Utility Industry’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 189–209.
5.
DeziL. (1997), II mercato dell'energia elettrica Ira utilità eprofitto, Padova: CE DAM.
6.
DomanicoF. (2007), ‘Concentration in the European electricity industry: The internal market as solution?’, Energy Policy, Vol. 35, Issue 10, pp. 5064–5076.
7.
DunningJ. (1992), ‘The Competitive Advantage of Countries and the Activities of Transnational Corporations’, Transnational Corporations, Vol. 1, pp. 135–168.
8.
DynerI., and LarsenE. R. (2001), ‘From Planning to Strategy in the electricity industry’, Energy Policy, Vol. 29, Issue 13, pp. 1145–1154.
9.
FahyJ. (2001), The Role of Resources in Global Competition, London: Routledge.
10.
GlachantJ.M., and FignonD. (2003), Competition in European electricity markets: a cross-country comparison, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
11.
GrantR. (1991), ‘Porter's Competitive Advantage of Nations: an Assessment’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 535–548.
12.
Gravitie Limited, (2006), The Top 10 European Utility Companies, London.
13.
JamasbT., and PollittM. (2005), ‘Electricity Market Reform in the European Union: Re view of Progress toward Liberalisation and Integration’, The Energy Journal, Vol. 26, Special Issue, pp. 11–41.
14.
HaasR., GlachantJ. M., AuerH., KesericN., and PerezY. (2006), ‘Competition in the Continental European Electricity Market: Despair or Work in Progress?’, in Sio ShansiF. P., and PfaffenbergerW. (Ed.), Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15.
HavemanH. A. (1993), ‘Organizational Size and Change: Diversification in the Savings and Loan Industry after Deregulation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 20–50.
16.
InghamH., and ThompsonS. (1995), ‘Deregulation, Firm Capabilities and Diversifying Entry Decisions: the Case of Financial Services’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 77, No. 1. pp. 177–183.
17.
LambinJ. J. (2008), Market-driven management, Milan: McGraw-Hill.
18.
LevequeF., and MonturusR. (2008), ‘Mergers and Acquisitions within the European Power and Gas sectors: cases and patterns’, Paris: Cerna.
19.
KogutB. (1985), ‘Designing Global Strategies: Comparative and Competitive Value-Added Chains’, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 15–28.
20.
MidtunnA., Ruperez MicolaA., and OmlandT. (2003), ‘Path-dependent National systems or European Convergence? The case of European electricity markets’, in DjelicM. L., and QuackS. (ed.), Globalizations and Institutions: redefining the rules of the economic game, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
21.
MidtunnA. (2004), ‘Strategic Configuration: Options and Perspectives’, in FinonD., and MidtunnA. (ed.), Reshaping European gas and electricity industries: regulation, markets and business strategies, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22.
MontgomeryC. A., and HariharanS. (1991). ‘Diversified Expansion by Large Established Firms’,Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 71–89.
23.
OhmaeK. (1985), Triad Power: the Coming Shape of Global Competition, New York: Free Press.
PettusM. L., KorY. Y., and MahoneyJ. T. (2009), ‘A theory of change in turbulent environments: the sequencing of dynamic capabilities following industry deregulation’, International Journal of Strategic Change Management, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 186–211.
26.
PorterM. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage. Creating and Sustaining Superior Performances, New York: Free Press.
27.
PorterM. E. (1990), ‘The competitive advantage of nations’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 73–93.
28.
RiderG. (1999), ‘Ten lessons for the changing European electricity landscape’,The Electricity Journal, April, pp. 13–19.
29.
SerrallesR. J. (2006), ‘Electric energy restructuring in the European Union: Integration, subsidiarity and the challenge of harmonization’, Energy Policy, Vol. 34, Issue 6, pp. 2542–2551.
30.
Standards and Poor's (2007), Global Industries Surveys: Electric Utilities, Europe, New York.
