Geographical distance and the prevailing legal environment are important factors in cross-border transactions. Using a sample of 1507 worldwide transactions, this article examines the impact of geographical and legal proximity on the performance of M&A transactions. It is found that capital market reactions for targets in Asia Pacific are only about half (10.7%) compared to those in North America (23.5%) or Europe (22.6%). Furthermore, while it is generally believed that geographical distance is harmful, target firms under-perform in transactions with neighbouring countries by up to 8.1%. It seems that acquirers pay less for firms that are close to their own market (negative neighbouring country effect). When looking at legal aspects, the evidence presented here (weakly) supports the view that after a transaction, acquiring firms bootstrap superior governance mechanisms of their targets (bootstrapping hypothesis). Moreover, management of target firms in countries with weaker shareholder rights tends to accept offers too early, while the management of acquirers coming from a weaker legal system tends to overpay (shareholder rights hypothesis).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhnS. and DenisD. (2004), ‘Internal capital markets and investment policy: evidence from corporate spinoffs’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 71, pp. 489–516.
2.
BarberB.LyonJ. and TsaiC. (1999), ‘Improved methods for tests of long-run abnormal stock returns’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 165–201.
3.
Braga Dos SantosM., ErrunzaV. R. and MillerD. P. (2008), Does corporate international diversification destroy value? Evidence from cross-border mergers and acquisitions, August 19, Working Paper, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=502322.
4.
BrisA.BrisleyN. and CabolisC. (2008), ‘Adopting better corporate governance: evidence from cross-border mergers’, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 224–240.
5.
BrisA. and CabolisC. (2008), ‘The value of investor protection: firm evidence from cross-border mergers’, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 605–648.
6.
BrownS. and WarnerJ. (1985), ‘Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 3–31.
7.
CampaM. and HernandoI. (2004), ‘Shareholder value creation in European M&As’, European Financial Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 47–81.
8.
CovalJ. and MoskowitzT. (1999), ‘Home bias at home: local equity preference in domestic portfolios’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 2045–2073.
9.
DanboltJ. (2004), ‘Target company cross-border effects in acquisitions into the UK’, European Financial Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 83–108.
10.
DeLongG. (2001), ‘Stockholder gains from focusing versus diversifying bank mergers’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 221–252.
11.
DoukasJ. and TravlosN. G. (1988), ‘The effect of corporate multinationalism on shareholders’ wealth: Evidence from international acquisitions’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 1161–1175.
12.
GoergenM. and RenneboogL. (2004), ‘Shareholder wealth effects of European domestic and cross-border takeover bids’, European Financial Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 9–45.
13.
GregoryA. (1997), ‘An examination of the long run performance of UK acquiring firms’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 24, No. 7–8, pp. 971–1002.
14.
GroteM. H. and RückerF. (2007), ‘Acquiring foreign firms far away might be hazardous to your share price: evidence from Germany’, Working Paper Series: Finance and Accounting 182, Frankfurt am Main: Goethe University.
15.
HansenR. G. (1987), ‘A theory for the choice of exchange medium in mergers and acquisitions’, Journal of Business, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 75–95.
16.
HarfordJ. (1999), ‘Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 1969–1997.
17.
KangJ. and KimJ. (2008), ‘The geography of block acquisitions’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 2817–2858.
18.
KediaS.PanchapagesanV. and UysalV. (2008), ‘Geography and acquirer returns’, Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 256–275.
19.
KothariS. and WarnerJ. (2007), ‘Econometrics of event studies’, In: EckboE. (ed.), Handbook of Corporate Finance – Empirical Corporate Finance, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 3–36.
20.
La PortaR., Lopez-de-SilanesF., ShleiferA. and VishnyR. (1998), ‘Law and finance’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 106, No. 6, pp. 1113–1155.
21.
MartynovaM. and RenneboogL. (2006), ‘Mergers and acquisitions in Europe’, In: RenneboogL. (ed.), Advances in Corporate Finance and Assets Pricing, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 15–76.
22.
MartynovaM. and RenneboogL. (2008a), ‘Spillover of corporate governance standards in cross-border mergers and acquisitions’, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 200–223.
23.
MartynovaM. and RenneboogL. (2008b), ‘A century of corporate takeovers: what have we learned and where do we stand?’, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 2148–2177.
24.
MartynovaM. and RenneboogL. (2009), ‘What determines the financing decision in corporate takeovers: cost of capital, agency problems, or the means of payment?’, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 290–315.
25.
MoellerS.SchlingemannF. and StulzR. (2005), ‘Wealth destruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recent merger wave’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 757–782.
26.
MørckR.ShleiferA. and VishnyR. (1990), ‘Do managerial objectives drive bad acquisitions?’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 31–48.
27.
OlerD. (2008), ‘Does acquirer cash level predict post-acquisition returns?’, Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 479–511.
28.
RossiS. and VolpinP. (2004), ‘Cross-country determinants of mergers and acquisitions’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 277–304.
29.
SchwertW. (1996), ‘Markup pricing in mergers and acquisitions’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 153–192.
30.
SchwertW. (2000), ‘Hostility in takeovers: in the eyes of the beholder?’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 2599–2640.
31.
StarksL. and WeiK. (2005), Cross-border mergers and differences in corporate governance, Texas, US: University of Texas-Austin, Working Paper.
32.
StulzR. (2007), ‘The limits of financial globalization’, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 8–15.
33.
SuitsD. (1984), ‘Dummy variables: mechanics v. Interpretation’, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 177–180.
