Job-irrelevant discrimination seems as ubiquitous as the performance appraisals in which it is commonly detected. This paper explores both compliance-based and more proactive approaches that deal with the various possible sources of discrimination in performance appraisal ratings. The suggestions lead to a code of practice for performance management in firms across cultures and national boundaries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerN. J. (1991), International Dimensions of Organizational Behaviour, Boston: PWS-Kent.
2.
American Psychological Association (1991), ‘In the supreme court of the United States: Price Waterhouse v. Ann B. Hopkins: Amicus curiae brief for the American Psychological Association’, American Psychologist, Vol. 46, No. 10, pp. 1061–1070.
3.
American Psychological Association (2003), ‘In the supreme court of the United States: Grutter v. Bollinger, et al. and Gratz and Hamacher v. Bollinger, et al.’,Brief amicus curiae of the American Psychological Association in support of respondents Nos. 02-241 and 02-516, Retrieved March, 2003.
4.
ArveyR. D., and CampionJ. E. (1982), ‘The employment interview: A summary of recent research’, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 35, pp. 281–322.
5.
AtwaterL. E., OstroffC., YammarinoF. J., and FleenorJ. W. (1998), ‘Self-other agreement: Does it really matter?’, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 577–598.
6.
BaltesB. B., BauerC. B., and FrenschP. A. (2007), ‘Does a structured free recall intervention reduce the effect of stereotypes on performance ratings and by what cognitive mechanism?’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, pp. 151–164.
7.
Barnes-FarrellJ. L. (2001), ‘Performance appraisal: Person perception processes and challenges’,How People Evaluate Others in Organizations, pp. 135–153, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
BernardinH. J., HaganC. M., KaneJ. S., and VillanovaP. (1998), ‘Effective performance management: A focus on precision, customers, and situational constraints’, In: SmitherJ. W. (ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art and Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 3–48.
9.
BormanW. C. (1987), ‘Personal constructs, performance schemata, and ‘folk theories’ of subordinate effectiveness: Explorations in an army officer sample’, Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 40, pp. 307–322.
10.
BormanW. C. (1991), ‘Job behavior, performance, and effectiveness’, In: DunnetteM. D., and HoughL. M. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, Vol. 2. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, pp. 271–326.
11.
ButeraF., and MugnyG. (2001), ‘Conflicts and social influences in hypothesis testing’, In: De DreuC., and De VriesN. (eds.), Group Consensus and Minority Influence: Implications for Innovation, Maiden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 160–182.
12.
CascioW. (1998), Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management (5th edition), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
CascioW. F., and BernardinH. J. (1981), ‘Implications of performance appraisal litigation for personnel decisions’, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 34, pp. 211–226.
14.
CawleyB. D., KeepingL. M., and LevyP. E. (1998), ‘Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83, pp. 615–633.
15.
Commission for Racial Equality (2005), Statutory Code of Practice on Racial Equality in Employment, London: Belmont Press.
16.
CousseyM. (2002), ‘Tackling Racial Equality: International Comparisons’,Home Office Research Study 238, London: Home Office.
17.
DovidioJ. F., and GaertnerS. L. (1998), ‘On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The causes, consequences, and challenges of aversive racism’, In: EberhardtJ. L., and FiskeS. T. (eds.), Confronting Racism: The Problem and the Response, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 3–32.
18.
FiskeS. T., BersoffD. N., BorgidaE., DeauxK. (1991), ‘Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins’, American Psychologist, Vol. 46, pp. 1049–1060.
19.
FiskeS. T. (2002), ‘What we know about bias and intergroup conflict, the problem of the century’,Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, pp. 123–128.
20.
FordJ. K., SchechtmanS. L., and KraigerK. (1986), ‘Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: A meta-analysis of performance criteria’, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 99, pp. 330–337.
21.
GillilandS. W., and LangdonJ. C. (1998), ‘Creating performance management systems that promote perceptions of fairness’, In: SmitherJ. W. (ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 209–243.
22.
GraenG. B., and Uhl-BienM. (1998), ‘Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective’, In: DansereauF., and YammarinoF. (eds.), Leadership: The Multiple-Level Approaches: Contemporary and Alternative, Stamford: JAI, pp. 103–155.
23.
GrebinoskiJ., and JonesR. G. (2003), Aversive discrimination in the employment interview: Investigating mitigating institutional pressures, Paper presented as part of symposium, ‘Beyond mere compliance: Applying psychology to reducing discrimination' at Society far I/O psychology (SIOP), Orlando.
24.
GreenhausJ. H., ParasuramanS., and WormleyW. M. (1990), ‘Effects of race on organisational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 33, pp. 64–86.
25.
GuionR. M. (1991), ‘Personnel, assessment, selection and placement’, In: DunnetteM. D., and HoughL. M. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, Vol. 2, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, pp. 327–397.
26.
HaertelC. E. J., and DouthittS. S. (1999), ‘Equally qualified but unequally perceived: Openness to perceived dissimilarity as a predictor of race and sex discrimination in performance judgments’, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 10, pp. 79–89.
27.
HauensteinN. M. A. (1998), ‘Training raters to increase the accuracy of appraisals and the usefulness of feedback’, In: SmitherJ. W. (ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art and Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 404–442.
28.
HeilmanM. E. (1983), ‘Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model’, Research in Organisational Behavior, Vol. 5, pp. 269–298.
29.
HoggM. A., and TerryD. J. (2001), ‘Social identity theory and organisational processes’, In: HoggM. A., and TerryD. J. (eds.), Social Identity Processes in Organisational Contexts, Philadelphia: Psychology Press, pp. 1–12.
30.
IlgenD. R. and YoutzM. A. (1990), ‘Factors affecting the evaluation and development of minorities in organizations’, In: FerrisG. R., and RowlandK. M. (eds.), Performance Evaluation, Goal Setting, and Feedback, London: JAI Press.
31.
Jeanquart-BaroneS. (1996), ‘Implications of racial diversity in the supervisor-subordinate relationship’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 26, pp. 935–944.
32.
KraigerK., and FordJ. K. (1985), ‘A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 70, pp. 56–65.
33.
KramE. K., and HallD. T. (1996), ‘Mentoring in a context of diversity and turbulence’, In: ErnstE. E., and LobelS. A. (eds.), Managing Diversity: Human Resource Strategies for Transforming the Workplace, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 109–136.
34.
LandyF. J., and FarrJ. L. (1980), ‘Performance rating’, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 87, pp. 72–107.
35.
MurphyK. R., and ClevelandJ. N. (1995), Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organisational, and Goal-Based Perspectives, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
36.
PettigrewT. F. (1979), ‘The ultimate attribution error: Extending Airport's cognitive analysis of prejudice’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 5, pp. 461–476.
37.
PryorJ. B., LaViteC. M., and StollerL. M. (1993), ‘A social psychological analysis of sexual harassment: The person/situation interaction’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 42, pp. 68–83.
38.
PulakosE. D., and WexleyK. H. (1983), ‘The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 129–139.
39.
SackettP. R., and DuBoisC. L. Z. (1991), ‘Rater-ratee race effects on performance evaluation: Challenging meta-analytic conclusions’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 873–877.
40.
SmitherJ. W. (1998), ‘Lessons learned: Research implications for performance appraisal and management practice’, In: SmitherJ. W. (ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art and Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 537–547.
41.
SnyderM., and SwannW. (1978), ‘Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 36, pp. 1202–1212.
42.
StaufferJ. M., and BuckleyM. R. (2005), ‘The existence and nature of racial bias in supervisory ratings’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, pp. 586–591.
43.
ThomasK. M., HuC. Y., GerwinA., BinghamK., and YanchusN. (2003), The roles of newcomers' race, gender, and proactivity on old-timers' willingness to mentor: A policy capturing study, Presented at Society for Industrial and Organisational Psychology Convention, San Diego.
44.
TomkiewiczJ., BrennerO. C., and Adeyemi-BelloT. (1998), ‘The impact of perceptions and stereotypes on the managerial mobility of African Americans’, The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 138, pp. 88–92.
45.
WilsonK. Y. (1995), ‘Appraisal: A Fair Assessment?’,CRE Connections, No. 4, April, London, England: Commission for Racial Equality.
46.
WilsonK. Y. (2003), An exploration of the underlying meaning of job performance ratings for different ethnic groups, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, UMI No. 3115800.
47.
YoungcourtS. S., LeivaP. I., and JonesR. G. (2007), ‘Perceived purposes of performance appraisal: Correlates of individual- and position-focused purposes’, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 18, pp. 315–343.
