Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper argues the advantages of Real Options thinking and by means of examples, exhibits the types of decision-making calculations that are distinctive to Real Options. However, in the process of clarifying the application of Real Options analysis to real decision making, a strong dependency upon scenario thinking is established. The value to decision makers of Real Options depends crucially on the substance and use of the scenarios on which it rests. The distinctive contribution of this paper consists in substantiating this view.

By forging a critical link between Real Options analysis and scenario thinking, this paper illustrates how the beneficial application of Real Options to decision making brings it down from the esoteric heights of mathematics, converts it into a technique readily accessible to managers and qualifies it for inclusion in the curriculum of management education. Two cases drawn from personal experience are used to illustrate the approach recommended by the authors.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AHA (2003), Heart and Stroke Facts, American Heart Academy publication.

Anderson

T. J.

(2000), ‘Real Options analysis in strategic decision making: an applied approach in a dual options framework’, Journal of Applied Management Studies, Vol. 9, pp. 235-255.

Bain (2000), ‘Survey on Real Options’, The Financial Times, October 18.

Borison

(2005), ‘Real Option Analysis: Where are the Emperor Clothes?’, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Volume 17, No. 2, pp. 17-31.

Clemons

and Webber

(1990), ‘Strategic Information Technology Investments: Guidelines for Decision Making’, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 9-28.

Copeland

T. E.

and Antikarov

(2005), ‘Real Options: Meeting the Georgetown Challenge’, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Volume 17, No. 2, pp. 32-51.

Dixit

A. K.

and Pindyck

R. S.

(1995), ‘The Options Approach to Capital Investment’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 3, pp. 105-116.

Favato

Mills

R. W.

and Weinstein

(2005), ‘Real Options Taxonomies’, Henley Management College Discussion paper Series, HDP 10.

Hayes

R. H

, and Garvin

D. A.

(1982), ‘Managing as if Tomorrow Mattered’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 70-79.

10.

Kaplan

(1986), ‘Must CIM be Justified by Faith Alone?’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 87-95.

11.

Micalizzi

Opzioni Reali, pp. 333-365, EGEA, SDA Bocconi.

12.

Micalizzi

and Favato

(1999), ‘Il caso Eli Lilly: Valutazione del Lancio di un Nuovo Prodotto’, in Micalizzi

and Favato

(1999), ‘Timing to Invest and Value of managerial Flexibility: the Schering Plough Case Study’, in Trigeorgis

and Micalizzi

, Proceedings of the first Milan international workshop on Real Options, EGEA, SDA Bocconi, pp. 97-126.

13.

Miller

K. D.

and Waller

G. H.

(2003), ‘Scenarios, Real Options and Integrated Risk Management’, bong Range Planning, Vol. 36, pp. 93-107.

14.

Mills

Roger W.

(1995), ‘Developments in the theory and practice of Capital Investments: Current Usage of Capital Investment Appraisal Techniques’, Manager Update, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 34-46.

15.

Myers

S. C.

(1977), ‘Determinants of Corporate Borrowing’, Journal of Financial Economics 5, pp. 147-175.

16.

Naj

(1990), ‘In R&D, the Next Best Thing to a Gut Feeling’, The Wall Street Journal,May21.

17.

Polakoff

(1990), ‘Computer Integrated Manufacturing: A New look at Cost Justification’, Journal of Accountancy, 169, pp. 24-29.

18.

Russo

J. E

Shoemaker

J. P. H.

(1989), Decision Traps, New York: Fireside Edition.

19.

Sender

G. L.

(1994), ‘Option Analysis at Merck’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72, No. 1,p. 92.

20.

Trigeorgis

(2005), ‘Making use of real options simple: an overview and applications in flexible/modular decision making’, The Engineering Economist, Vol. 50, pp. 25-53.

21.

Weinstein

(1995), ‘The Use of Scenario Thinking’, in Developing Strategic Thought, ed. Garratt

, Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.

Using Scenario Thinking to Make Real Options Relevant to Managers: A Case Illustration

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References