HallE. T. and HallM. R., Understanding Cultural Differences: Germans, French and Americans, Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, 1990.
2.
Hampden-TurnerC. and TrompenaarsF., The Seven Cultures of Capitalism: Value Systems for Creating Wealth in the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Sweden and the Netherlands, London: Piatkus, 1994.
3.
HicksonD. J. and PughD. S., Management Worldwide: The Impact of Societal Culture on Organizations around the Globe, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1995.
4.
LawrenceP. A., Management in the USA, London: Sage, 1996.
5.
LockeR. R., The Collapse of the American Management Mystique, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
6.
LuthansF. and HodgettsR. M., ‘Management in North America’ in Warner, M. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, London: International Thomson, 1996, pp. 2967-80.
7.
ChandlerA. D. Jr., Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge, MA, 1962.
8.
ChandlerA. D. Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, MA; London, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1977.
9.
ChandlerA. D. Jr., Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge, MA; London, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1990.
10.
LaneC., Management and Labour in Europe: The Industrial Enterprise in Germany, Britain and France, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1989.
11.
WhitleyR. (ed.), European Business Systems: Firms and Markets in their National Contexts, London: Sage, 1992.
12.
cf.MerkleJ. A. Management and Ideology: The Legacy of the International Scientific Management Movement, Berkeley, CA; London, University of California Press, 1980.
13.
cf.HughesT. P. American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, New York, NY: Penguin Books, 1990, first published 1989, see particularly chapter 6: ‘Taylorismus + Fordismus = Amerikanismus’.
14.
cf. Lawrence, 1996, op. cit., pp. 37-48.
15.
cf. Hampden-Turner and Trompenaars, 1994, op. cit., pp. 20-31.
16.
cf. Hampden-Turner and Trompenaars, 1994, op. cit., pp. 20-31.
17.
HofstedeG., Culture ‘s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1980.
18.
HofstedeG., Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, London: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
19.
HofstedeG., ‘Organization Culture’ in Warner, M. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, London: International Thomson, 1996, pp. 3821-36.
20.
cf.RappaportA. Creating Shareholder Value – the new Standard for Business Performance, 2nd edition, New York, NY; London, Free Press, 1998.
21.
ClarkhamJ. P., Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
22.
LawrenceP. A., Managers and Management in West Germany, London: Croom Helm, 1980.
23.
SorgeA. and WarnerM., Comparative Factory Organization: An Anglo-German Comparison of Management and Manpower in Manufacturing, Aldershot: Gower Press, 1986.
24.
Lane, 1989, op. cit.
25.
WarnerM. and CampbellA., ‘German Management’, 1993, as reprinted in: Hickson, D. J. (ed.), Exploring Management Across the World: Selected Readings, London: Penguin, 1997, pp. 169-187.
26.
StewartR.; BarsouxJ.-L.; KieserA.; GanterH.-D.; and WalgenbachP., Managing in Britain and Germany, London: Macmillan; New York, NY: St. Martin's Press, 1994.
27.
MarrR., ‘Management in Germany’, in Warner, M. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Business and Management, London: International Thomson, 1996, pp. 2860-68.
28.
GlunckU., WilderomC., and OgilvieR., ‘Finding the Key to German-Style Management’, International Studies of Management and Organization, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1997, pp. 93-108.
29.
PorterM. E., The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan, 1990, pp. 356ff.
30.
cf. Warner and Campbell, 1993, op. cit.,p. 172.
31.
cf. The Economist, July 4 and November 21, 1998.
32.
cf. The Economist, June 3, 1995.
33.
WengerE., KnoeselJ., and KnollL., ‘Der systematische Besuch von Haupt-versammlungen im Rahmen der betriebswirtschaftlichen Hochschulausbildung’ in ElschenR.; SiegelTh.; and WagnerF. W. (eds.), Unternehmenstheorie und Besteuerung, Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Dieter Schneider, Wiesbaden, 1995, pp. 749-772.
34.
WengerE. and KasererC., ‘The German System of Corporate Governance - A Model Which Should not be Imitated’, in BlackS. W. and MoerschM. (eds.), Competition and Convergence in Financial Markets - The German and Anglo-American Models, Amsterdam, North-Holland Elsevier Science, 1998a, pp. 41-78.
35.
cf. Lawrence, 1996, op. cit.,p. 4.
36.
cf. Locke, 1996, op. cit.,p. 49.
37.
KippingM. and BjarnarO. (eds.), The Americanisation of European Business: The Marshall Plan and the Transfer of US Management Models, London and New York, NY: Routledge, 1998.
38.
DjelicM.-L., Exporting the American Model: The Postwar Transformation of European Business, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
39.
Servan-SchreiberJ.-J., Le Défi Américain (The American Challenge), Paris: Denvel, 1967.
40.
FernerA. and QuintanillaJ., ‘Multinationals, National Business Systems and HRM: The Enduring Influence of National Identity or a Process of ‘Anglo-Saxonization”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1998, pp. 710-31.
41.
cf. Der Spiegel, February 1, 1999.
42.
cf. Die Welt, January 15, March 16, and November 17, 1999.
43.
cf. Die Welt, April 7, 1999.
44.
cf. Financial Times, November 16 and December 6, 1999.
45.
cf. The Economist, November 27, 1999, January 29, 2000.
46.
cf. The Economist, November 7, 1998.
47.
cf. The Economist, December 5, 1998.
48.
The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), ‘DaimlerChrysler: An Initial Profile of a New Company’, Motor Business Europe, 1st Quarter 1999, pp. 74-102.
49.
cf. Der Spiegel, December 7, 1998.
50.
cf. The Economist, July,17, 1999.
51.
cf. Business Week, November 16, 1998, pp. 25-9.
52.
cf. Der Spiegel, November 9, 1998; February 15 and June 28, 1999.
53.
cf. Financial Times, December 3, 1999.
54.
cf.LeesS.‘HRM and the Legitimacy Market’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1997, pp. 226-243.
55.
cf. The Economist, July 4, 1998.
56.
cf. Financial Times, November 10, 1998.
57.
BühnerR., RasheedA., and RosensteinJ., ‘Corporate Restructuring Patterns in the US and Germany: A Comparative Empirical Investigation’, Management International Review, Vol. 37, No. 4, 1997, pp. 319-338.
58.
cf. Financial Times, November 5, 1998.
59.
cf. Die Welt, November 12, 1998.
60.
cf. Die Welt, April 3, 1999.
61.
cf. Der Spiegel,May17, 1999.
62.
WengerE. and KasererC., ‘German Banks and Corporate Governance - A Critical View’, in HoptK. J.; KandaH.; RoeM. J.; WymeerschE.; and PriggeS. (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance - The State of the Art and Emerging Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998b, pp. 499-536.
63.
cf. Der Spiegel, February 15, 1999.
64.
Thyssen-Krupp, company press release, December 3, 1999.
65.
cf. Die Welt, December 4, 1998.
66.
cf. Die Welt, August 4, 1998.
67.
Thyssen-Krupp, op. cit.
68.
cf. The Economist, July 4, 1998.
69.
BerndtC., ‘Corporate Germany at the Crossroads? Americanization, Competitive-ness and Place Dependence’, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Working Paper No. 98, June1998.
70.
Locke, 1996, op. cit.,p. 1.
71.
Lawrence, 1996, op. cit., pp. 126-31.
72.
Ferner and Quintanilla, 1998, op. cit., pp. 724ff.
73.
Hofstede, 1980, op. cit.
74.
Hofstede, 1991, op. cit.
75.
Hofstede, 1996, op. cit
76.
Hampden-Turner and Trompenaars, 1994, op. cit.
77.
cf. Financial Times, February 4 and 5, 2000.
78.
PlenderJ., ‘Whirlwinds of Change’, Financial Times, February 4, 2000.