The Reconciliation of the " Classical " and "Scientific" Approaches to International Relations ?

Hedley Bull , " International Theory: the Case for a Classical Approach," World Politics, Vol. XVIII, No. 3, April 1966, pp. 361-377.

Morton A. Kaplan , "The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations," World Politics, Vol. XIX, No. 1, October 1966, pp. 1-20.

Kaplan , op. cit., p. 19.

Ibid. p. 20.

Bull , op. cit., pp. 364-365.

C.C. Pentland , "Neo-functionalism," Yearbook of World Affairs, Vol. 27, 1973, pp-346-371.

Reginald J. Harrison , Europe in Question, 1974, pp. 86-88.

Quoted in ibid. p. 87.

Quoted in ibid. p. 94.

Quoted in ibid. p. 88.

Leon Lindberg and Stuart Scheingoid , Europe's Would-be Polity, 1970.

H. Butterfield and M. Wight (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations, 1966.

In ibid pp. 89-131.

In Britain, the movement in this direction is associated with the International Political Economy Group, which now meets under the umbrella of the British International Studies' Association, and with the name of its convenor, Susan Strange. See, in this connection, Economics and Politics in International Studies, Chatham House, 1972; Christopher Brown , "International Political Economy: Some Problems of an Interdisciplinary Enterprise," International Affairs, Vol. 49, No. 1, January 1973, pp. 51-60; and Susan Strange , " What is Economic Power and Who Has It? " International Journal, Vol. 30, No. 2, Spring 1975 , pp. 207-224. In the United States, the movement is centred on the journal International Organisation. See the special edition of this journal, entitled "World Politics and International Economics," Winter 1975, Vol. 29, No. 1,