See Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962). He terms research within this consensual framework "normal science."
2.
See, for example, April Carter, Direct Action & Liberal Democracy (New York: Harper & Row, 1973).
3.
Karl W. Deutsch, The Nerves of Government (New York: Free Press, 1963), pp. 3-4. Deutsch used "philosophical stage" and "application " in ways that relate to Kuhn's " paradigm change " and "normal science."
4.
John V. Vasquez, The Power of Paradigms: An Empirical Evaluation of International Relations Inquiry (Dissertation submitted to Syracuse University , 1974). In it Vasquez discusses the Morgenthau " paradigm " or set of hypotheses, and the way in which it has reflected thought, research or practice over the decades. The work referred to is Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power & Peace (New York: Knopf, 1948).
5.
Thomas Kuhn, op. cit.; and Karl Deutsch, op. cit.
6.
The term "post-behaviouralist " is taken from David Easton. See " The New Revolution in Political Science," American Political Science ReviewLXIII, No. 4, December 1969.
7.
See the various articles by Kuhn, Popper and others in Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972).
8.
Ian I. Mitroff, The Subjective Side of Science (The Hague: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., 1974).
9.
Report of the Review Committee on Overseas Representation 1968-69 (H.M.S.O., Cmnd. 4107, 1969).
10.
Many interesting methodological issues have been touched upon here, and the reader may wish to pursue them further by referring, in addition to those books already foot-noted, to the following: Bryan Magee, Popper (London: Collins, 1973 ); Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).
