Research involving early adolescents highlights systematic declines in motiva- tion for learning as students progress from elementary school to secondary school. Students' attributions or explanations for past achievement outcomes often are important determinants of future activity choice, investment and persistence. In this article, we critique prior music attribution research and report findings from our empirical study of American 7th-graders' attributional beliefs about success and failure in classroom music. Our results demonstrated that secondary students do not attribute success and failure to the same factors, and that many of the most salient reasons for music-related outcomes (family-, teacher- and peer-influence) are not addressed in traditional attribution research. Attributional beliefs, particularly those concerning music ability, were strongly linked to students' music self-concept and achievement test scores, and the magnitude of those linkages was typically greater when students reflected upon past failures. Based on these findings, we recommend that music practitioners increase their awareness of students' attributional beliefs (particularly the tendency to attribute failure to lack of ability and/or negative family influence), encourage students to consider the r6le that less stable and more controllable factors (effort, persistence, strategy use, metacognition) play in determining achievement outcomes, and employ instructional or evaluative strategies that promote more expansive and developmental views of music ability among all students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderman, E. M.
and Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Reviewof Educational Research, 64, 287-309.
2.
Arnold, J. A.
(1997). A comparison of attributions for success and failure in instrumental musicamong sixth-, eighth- and tenth-grade students. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education,15(2), 19-23.
3.
Asmus, E. P.
(1985). Sixth graders' achievement motivation: Their views of success and failure inmusic. Bulletin of the Councilfor Research in Music Education, 85, 1-13.
4.
Asmus, E. P.
(1986a). Achievement motivation characteristics of music education and music therapystudents as identified by attribution theory. Bulletin of the Councilfor Research in Music Education,86, 71-85.
5.
Asmus, E. P.
(1986b). Factors students believe to be the causes of success orfailure in music. Paperpresented at the national in-service meeting of the Music Educators National Conference, Anaheim,California.
6.
Asmus, E. P.
(1986c). Student beliefs about the causes of success and failure in music: A study ofachievement motivation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 262-278.
7.
Asmus, E. P.
(1987). The effect of grade level and motivation level on high school students' beliefsof the causes for their success and failure. Paper presented at the Southeastern Music Education Symposium, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
8.
Asmus, E. P.
(1989a). Criterion and construction validity of two measures of motivation for music. Paper presented at the Northwest Division Meeting of the Music Educators National Conference,Boise, Idaho.
9.
Asmus, E. P.
(1989b). The effect of music teachers on students' motivation to achieve in music.Canadian Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 14-21.
10.
Asmus, E. P.
and Harrison, C. S. (1990). Characteristics of motivation for music and musical aptitudeof undergraduate non-music majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 258-269.
11.
Austin, J. R.
(1988). The effect of music contest format on self-concept, motivation, achievementand attitude of elementary band students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 95-107.
12.
Austin, J. R.
(1990). The relationship of music self-esteem to degree of participation in school andout-of-school music activities among upper-elementary students. Contributions to Music Education, 17, 20-31.
13.
Austin, J. R.
(1991). Competitive and non-competitive goal structures: An analysis of motivationand achievement among elementary band students. Psychology of Music, 19, 142-158.
14.
Austin, J. R.
and Vispoel, W. P. (1992). Motivation after failure in school music performance classes:The facilitative effects of strategy attributions. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 111, 1-23.
15.
Bar-Tal, D.
and Frieze, I. H. (1976). Attributions of success and failure for actors and observers.Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 256-265.
16.
Bempechat, J.
, Nakkula, M. J., Wu, J. T. and Ginsburg, H. P. (1996). Attributions as predictors ofmathematics achievement: A comparative study. Joumal of Research and Development in Education, 29(2), 53-59.
17.
Boswell, J.
(1991). Comparisons of attitudinal assessments in middle and junior high school generalmusic. Bulletin of the Councilfor Research in Music Education, 108, pp. 49-57.
18.
Bracey, G. W.
(1996). International comparisons and the Condition of American Education. Educational Researcher, 25(1), 5-11.
19.
Cairns, L.
and Marsh, H. W. (1982). Sydney Attribution Scale. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.
20.
Chandler, T. A.
, Chiarella, D. and Auria, C. (1988). Performance expectancy, success, satisfactionand attributions as variables in band challenges. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35,249-258.
21.
Chen, C.
and Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Culture and academic achievement: Ethnic and cross-nationaldifferences. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 9, 119-151.
22.
Clifford, M.
(1984). Thoughts on a theory of constructive failure. Educational Psychologist, 19,108-120.
23.
Colwell, R.
(1969). Music achievement tests. Chicago: Follett.
24.
Covington, M. V.
(1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and schoolreform. Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Dweck, C. S.
(1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41,1040-1048.
26.
Eccles, J. S.
and Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classroomsfor early adolescents. In: R. E. Ames and C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139-186). New York: Academic.
27.
Eccles, J. S.
, Midgley, C. and Adler, T. F. (1984). Grade-related changes in the school environment:Effects on achievement motivation. In: J. G. Nicholls (Ed.), The development of achievementmotivation (pp. 283-331). Greenwich, CT.: J.A.I.
28.
Eccles, J. S.
and Wigfield, A. (1992). The development of achievement-task values: A theoreticalanalysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
29.
Eccles, J. S.
, Wigfield, A., Flanagan, C., Miller, C., Reuman, D. and Yee, D. (1989). Self-concepts,domain values and self-esteem: Relations and changes at early adolescence. Journal of Personality,57, 283-310.
30.
Eccles, J. S.
, Wigfield, A., Midgley, C., Reuman, D., Mac Iver, D. and Feldlaufer, H. (1993). Negativeeffects of traditional middle schools on students' motivation. Elementary School Journal, 93,553-574.
31.
Elig, T.
and Frieze, I. H. (1979). Measuring causal attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 621-634.
32.
Entwistle, N.
, Kozeki, B. and Balarabe, M. (1988). Motivation, attributions and approaches to learningin British and Hungarian secondary schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, L.A.
33.
Epstein, J. L.
and McPartland, J. M. (1976). The concept and measurement of the quality of schoollife. American Educational Research Journal, 13, 15-30.
34.
Forsterling, F.
(1985). Attribution retraining: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 495-512.
35.
Haladyna, T.
and Thomas, G. (1979). The attitudes of elementary school-children toward schooland subject matters. Journal of Experimental Education, 48, 18-23.
36.
Harter, S.
, Whitesell, N. R. and Kowalski, P. (1992). Individual differences in the effects of educationaltransitions on young adolescents' perceptions of competence and motivational orientation. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 777-808.
37.
Hawkins, J. N.
(1994). Issues of motivation in Asian education. In: H. F. O'Neil, Jr. and M. Drillings(Eds.), Motivation: Theory and Research (pp. 101-115). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
38.
Heider, F.
(1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
39.
Holloway, S. D.
(1988). Concepts of ability and effort in Japan and the United States. Review of Educational Research, 58, 327-345.
40.
Hurley, C. G.
(1994). Student motivations for beginning and continuing/discontinuing string musicinstruction. Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 44-55.
41.
Kelley, H. H.
(1971). Attribution in social interaction. Morristown, N.J.: General learning Press.
42.
Kirk, R. E.
(1982). Experimental design (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA.: Brooks/Cole.
43.
Kvet, E. J.
and Watkins, R. C. (1993). Success attributes in teaching music as perceived by elementaryeducation majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 70-80.
44.
Legette, R. M.
(1993). Causal attributions of music majors and non-music majors regarding successand failure in music: A study of motivation and achievement. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 4, 9-12.
45.
Leming, J.
(1987). Rock music and the socialisation of moral values in early adolescence. Youthand Society, 18(4), 263-383.
46.
Little, A. W.
(1985). The child's understanding of the causes of academic success and failure: Acase study of British school-children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(1), 11-23.
47.
Marsh, H. W.
(1984). Relationships among dimensions of self-attribution, dimensions of self-conceptand academic achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1291-1308.
48.
Marsh, H. W.
(1986). The self-serving effect (bias?) in academic attributions: Its relation to academicachievement and self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 190-200.
49.
Marsh, H. W.
(1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Pre-adolescenceto early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417-430.
50.
Marsh, H. W.
, Cairns, L., Relich, J., Barnes, J. and Debus, R. L. (1984). The relationship betweendimensions of self-attribution and dimensions of self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology,76, 3-32.
51.
McDonald, D.
(1990). General music in education. Design for Arts in Education, 91(5), 15-22.
52.
Mclnerney, D. M.
, Hinkley, J. and Dowson, M. (1997). Children's beliefs about success in theclassroom: Are there cultural differences? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
53.
Mizokawa, D. T.
and Ryckman, D. B. (1990). Attributions of academic success and failure: Acomparison of six Asian-American ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(4), 434-451.
54.
Nicholls, J. G.
(1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perception of ownattainment and the understanding that difficult tasks demand more ability. Child Development,49, 800-814.
55.
Peterson, C.
, Semmel, A., von Baeyer, C., Abramson, L. Y., Metalsky, G. I. and Seligman, M. E.P. (1982). The Attributional Style Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 287-300.
56.
Pogonowski, L. M.
(1985). Attitude assessment of upper elementary students in a process-orientedmusic curriculum. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 247-257.
57.
Reimer, B. S.
(1975). Influence of causal beliefs on affect and expectancy. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 31, 1163-1167.
58.
Rogers, C.
(1991). Children's attributions for success and failure in the British primary school.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Chicago, IL.
59.
Rotter, J. B.
(1966). Generalised expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs, 80, (Whole No. 609).
60.
Russell, D. W.
, McAuley, E. and Tarico, V. (1987). Measuring causal attributions for success andfailure: A comparison of methodologies for assessing causal dimensions. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 52, 1248-1257.
61.
Rutkowski, J.
(1994). A comparison of adolescents' in-school and out-of-school music experiencesand involvement. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 13(1), 17-22.
62.
Salili, F.
(1987). Age, sex and cultural differences in the meaning of achievement. Paper presentedat the Annual Convention of the American Psychogical Association, New York, N.Y.
63.
Schmidt, C. P.
(1995). Attributions of success, grade level and gender as factors in choral students'perceptions of teacher feedback. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 313-329.
64.
Schmitt, M.
(1979). Development and validation of a measure of music self-esteem of music ability.Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 5357A-5358A. (University Microfilms No. 80-09164.)
65.
Stauffer, S. L.
and Saunders, T. C. (1992). The middle school model and general music. General Music Today, 6(1), 6-10.
66.
Steinel, D. V.
(Ed.) (1984). Music and music education: Data and information. Reston, V.A.: Music Educators National Conference.
67.
Stevenson, H. W.
and Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap. New York: Summit Books.
68.
Stipek, D. J.
(1993). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice. Needham Heights, M.A.: Allynand Bacon.
69.
Thompson, K. P.
(1986). Status of music in Pennsylvania schools. Pennsylvania Music Educators Association Bulletin of Research, 17, 1-24.
70.
Thompson, K. P.
(1991). An examination of the consistency of junior high school students' preferencesfor general music activities. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 9(2), 11-16.
71.
Thompson, K. P.
(1994). Adolescents and media music. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 12(2), 9-15.
72.
Vispoel, W. P.
and Austin, J. R. (1993). Constructive response to failure in music: The r6le of attributionfeedback and classroom goal structure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 110-129.
73.
Vispoel, W. P.
and Austin, J. R. (1995). Success and failure in junior high school: A critical incidentapproach to understanding students' attributional beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 377-412.
74.
Weiner, B.
(1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3-25.
75.
Whang, P. A.
and Hancock, G. R. (1994). Motivation and mathematics achievement: Comparisonsbetween Asian-American and non-Asian students. Contemporary Educational Psychologist, 19,302-322.
76.
Wigfield, A.
, Eccles, J. S., Maclver, D., Reuman, D. A. and Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions at earlyadolescence: Changes in children's domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem acrossthe transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552-565.
77.
Yan, W.
and Gaier, E. L. (1994). Causal attributions for college success and failure: An Asian-American study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25(1), 146-158.
