Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examined the role of auditory and visual feedback during the sight-reading of a short piece of piano music. Its purpose was to identify errors that arose due to the removal of feedback and to compare the performances of pianists at different levels of sight-reading practice frequency, general musical experience and sight-reading ability. Subjects were tested under the following conditions: normal sight-reading, sight-reading when unable to view the keyboard (no visual feedback) and sight-reading where auditory feedback was unavailable (no auditory feedback). The findings indicated that performances where visual feedback was unavailable resulted in a significantly increased number of adjacent note errors, suggesting that visual feedback is utilised by pianists in order to guide the discrete movements of the hands over the keyboard, but that the degree to which it is relied upon is dependent on the pianist's familiarity with the sight-reading situation itself. Sight-reading when auditory feedback was unavailable proved to be indistinguishable from normal sight-reading, both being superior to performances where visual feedback was unavailable. General musical experience and sight-reading ability were significant factors in distinguishing between errors which might produce a breakdown in performance and those which will not impede fluency. This raises a series of questions concerning (a) differences between high ability and low ability pianists and (b) efficient practice techniques and objectives.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, J. A. (1968). Response feedback and learning. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 486-504.

Colavita, F. B. (1974). Human sensory dominance. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 409-412.

Diehl, M. J. and Seibel, R. (1962). The relative importance of visual and auditory feedback in speed typing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 5, 365-369.

Halpern, A. R. and Bower, G. H. (1982). Musical expertise and melodic structure in memory for musical notation. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 31-50.

Levin, H. and Kaplan, E. A. (1970). Grammatical structure in reading. In: H. Levin and J. P. Williams (Eds.), Basic studies on reading. New York: Basic Books.

Miller, R. B. (1953). Handbook of training and equipment design. Wright Air Defence Center - Technical Report, 53-136.

O'Regan, K. (1979). Movement to movement control of eye saccades as a function of textual parameters in reading. In: P. A. Kolers , M. E. Wrolstad and H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language, Vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press.

Rayner, K. (1978). Foveal and parafoveal cues in reading. In: J. Requin (Ed.), Attention and Performance, VII. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Sloboda, J. A. (1974). The eye-hand span: an approach to the study of sight-reading. Psychology of Music, 2, 4-10.

10.

Sloboda, J. A. (1976). Visual perception of musical notation: registering pitch symbols in memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 1-16.

11.

Sloboda, J. A. (1977). Phrase units as determinants of visual processing in music reading. British Journal of Psychology, 68, 117-124.

12.

Sloboda, J. A. (1978). Perception of contour in music reading. Perception, 7, 323-331.

13.

Walker, J. T. and Scott, K. J. (1981). Auditory - visual conflicts in the perceived duration of lights, tones and gaps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1327-1339.

14.

Weaver, H. E. (1943). A survey of visual processes in reading differently constructed musical selections. Psychological Monographs, 55, 1-30.

15.

West, J. (1967). Vision and kinethesis in the acquisition of type-writing skill. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 161-166.

The Role of Visual and Auditory Feedback during the Sight-Reading of Music

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References