Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1992-10
The Effects of Practice Strategies,Individual Differences in Cognitive Style,and Gender upon Technical Accuracy and Musicality of Student Instrumental Performance
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of field dependence! independence and gender upon technical accuracy and musicality of student instrumental performance under both structured and free practice conditions. Field-dependence/independence was assessed by the Group Embedded Figures Test. Fifity-five brass and woodwind students between grades 7 and 10 were assigned to either a free practice group or a structured practice group. Subjects had four short practice sessions distributed across two weeks. Performances were evaluated by three independent judges. ANCOVA tests revealed significant main effects for practice condition for all dependent variables. Two significant interactions were observed for rhythmic accuracy: Practice Condition x Gender and Practice Condition x Gender x Field Dependence/Independence. The data indicate that the practice procedures used by the structured practice group were more conducive to improvement in musical performance. These findings are consistent with the literaturc, suggesting that a highly organised and systematic regimen of supervised practice is an effective means of improving musical performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barry, N. H.
(1990). The effects of different practice techniques upon technical accuracy and musicality in student instrumental performance. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 1, 4-8.
2.
Brokaw, J. P. (1983). The extent to which parental supervision and other selected factors are related to achievement of musical and technical-physical characteristics by beginning instru- mental music students. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 3252A.
3.
Brown, R. A.
(1928). A comparative study of whole, part, and combination methods of learning piano music. Journal of Experimental Psychology, XII, 235-248.
4.
Ciepluch, G. M. (1988). Sightreading achievement in instrumental music performance, learning gifts, and academic achievement: A correlation study. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitv of Wisconsin-Madison, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(6), 1398-A.
5.
Cohen, J. C.
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Goodenough, D. R.
(1976). The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 675-794.
7.
Heitland, K. W. (1982). Cognitive styles and musical aptitudes: An exploratory study. (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(8). 2534-A.
8.
Johnson, C. E.
(1979). Mental practice for skill acquisition. (ERIC No. ED206575)
9.
Kafer, H. A. (1982). The structured border lesson: The effectiveness of controlling the entry anid exit environment of the private music lesson. (Doctoral dissertation, North Texas State Univer- sity, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4347A.
10.
Keppel, G.
, & Zedeck, S. (1989). Data analysis for research designzs: Anzalysis of variance andtl multiple regressionlcorrelation approaches. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.
11.
King, D. W. (1983). Field-dependence/field-independence and achievement in music reading. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts bIter- national, 44(5), 1320-A.
12.
Kogan, N.
(1983). Stylistic variation in childhood and adolescence: Creativity, metaphor. and cognitive styles. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. III. Coginitive development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
13.
Maccoby, E. E.
, & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
14.
Messick, S.
(1984). The nature of cognitive styles: problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59-74.
15.
Morgan, S. G. (1984). Dimensions of musical problem solving by high school instrumentalists: An exploratory investigation. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin. Madison, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(6), 1551-A.
16.
Mussen, P. H.
(Ed.) (1983). Handbook of child psychology (formerly Carmichael's manual ot child psychology) (4th ed.), Vol. III. Cognitive Development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
17.
Oxendine, J. B.
(1968). Psychology of motor learning. New York: Appleton-Century--Crofts.
18.
Rosenthal, R. K.
, Wilson, M., Evans, M., & Greenwalt, L. (1988). Effects of different practice conditions on advanced instrumentalists' performance accuracy. Jourtnal of Research in MusiC Education, 36, 250-257.
19.
Ross, S. L.
(1985). The effectiveness of mental practice in improving the performance of college trombonists.Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 221-230.
20.
Rubin-Rabson, G.
(1939). Studies in the psychology of memorizing piano music: I. A comparison of the unilateral and co-ordinated approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 321-345.
21.
Rubin-Rabson, G.
(1940a). Studies in the psychology of memorizing piano music: II. A compari- son of massed and distributed practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 270-284.
22.
Rubin-Rabson, G.
(1940b). Studies in the psychology of memorizing piano music: III. A corn- parison of the whole and part approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 460-476.
23.
Santana, E. L. (1978). Time-efficient skill acquisition in instrumental music study. UJnpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University.
24.
Saracho, O. N.
(1988). Cognitive styles in early childhood education. Journal of Research itn Childhood Education, 3(1), 24-34.
25.
Schmidt, C. P.
(1984). The relationship among aspects of cognitive style and language-bound/ language-optional perception to musicians' performance in aural discrimination tasks. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32(3), 159-168.
26.
Schmidt, C. P.
, & Lewis, B. E. (1987). Field-dependence/independence, movement-based instruction and fourth graders' achievement in selected musical tasks. Psychology of Music, 15, 117-127.
27.
Shaffer, L. H.
(1976). Intention and performance. Psychological Review, 83,(5), 375-393.
28.
Shapiro, E. K.
, & Weber, E. (Eds.) (1981). Cognitive and affective growth: Developmental inter- action. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaurri Associates.
29.
Sherman, J. A.
(1967). Problems of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning. Psychological Review, 74, 290-299.
30.
Vaught, G. M.
(1965). The relationship of role identification and ego strength to sex differences in the rod-and-frame test. Journal of Personality, 33, 271-283.
31.
Willett, B. E.
, & Netusil, A. J. (1989). Music computer drill and learning styles at the fourth- grade level. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37(3), 219-229.
32.
Witkin, H. A.
, Cox, P. W., Friedman, F., Hrishikesan, A. G., & Siegel, K. N. (1974). Supplement no. 1: Field-dependence-independence and psychological differentiation (Bibliography with index; RB-74-42). Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.
33.
Witkin, H. A.
, & Goodenough, D. R. (1979). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins (field depen- dence and field independence). Psychological Issues, Monograph 51. New York: International Universities Press.
34.
Witkin, H. A.
, Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications.Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
35.
Witkin, H. A.
, Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures tests. Palo Alto, Cal.: Consulting Psychologists Press.
36.
Wolfe, D. E.
(1984). The use of behavioural contracts in music instruction. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behaviour (pp. 43-50). Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
