Melodic Structure and Note Transition Probabilities: A Content Analysis of 15,618 Classical Themes

Abstract

A content analytical scheme is described that can assess aspects of melodic structure in large samples of themes. This objective, computerised system was applied to 15,618 themes drawn from the classical repertoire. Tables result that give the probabilities of twoand three-note transitions, and, in the former case, the probabilities are presented both transition-by-transition and averaged across all transitions. Despite the simplicity of the coding system, it has been shown in past research to be powerful enough to distinguish the musical style of a composer and to yield a measure of melodic originality that relates in significant ways with other aesthetic, biographical and historical variables. To illustrate this utility, the table of two-note transition probabilities is employed both to gauge the melodic originality of a sample set of composed themes and to generate contrived themes with known originality scores for use in laboratory experiments on musical aesthetics.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barlow, H. and Morgenstern, S , (1948). A Dictionary of Musical Themes. New York: Crown.

Barlow, H. and Morgenstern, S. (1950). A Dictionary of Vocal Themes. New York: Crown.

Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts.

Brook, B. S. (1969). Style and content analysis in music: The simplified "Plaine and Easie Code". In The Analysis of Communication Content, eds. G. Gerbner , O. R. Holsti , K. Krippendorff , W. J. Paisley and P. J. Stone . New York: Wiley.

Chamberlain, P. J. (1974). Pitch and duration in recognition of music-like structures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38, 419-428.

Heyduk, R. G. (1975). Rated preference for musical compositions as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 84-91.

Martindale, C. (1975). Romantic Progression. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing.

Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and Meaning in Music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Moles, A. (1968). Information Theory and Esthetic Perception (trans. J. E. Cohen). Urbana: University of Illinois Press. (Originally published 1958 by Flammarion.) 15

10.

Paisley, W. J. (1964). Identifying the unknown communicator in painting, literature and music: The significance of minor encoding habits. Journal of Communication. 14, 219-237.

11.

Simonton, D. K. (1980a). Thematic fame and melodic originality: A multivariate computer-content analysis. Journal of Personality, 48, 206-219.

12.

Simonton, D. K. (1980b). Thematic fame, melodic originality, and musical zeitgeist: A biographical and transhistorical content analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 972-983.

13.

Simonton, D. K. (1983). Esthetics, biography, and history in musical creativity. In Documentary Report on the Ann Arbor Symposium on the Application of Psychology to the Teaching and Learning of Music (Session III). Reston, Virginia: Music Educators National Conference.

14.

Steck, L. and Machotka, P. (1975). Preference for musical complexity: Effects of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 104, 170-174.

15.

Vitz, P. C. (1964). Preferences for rates of information presented bv sequences ot tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 176-183.