The impact of background music (BGM) on vigilance task performance remains controversial. While previous research has focused on arousal as a mediating variable, recent studies suggest that task engagement also influences the effects of BGM on vigilance performance. This study investigated the impact of self-selected BGM on arousal, task engagement, and task performance during a vigilance task. A total of 36 participants completed the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) and questionnaires assessing energetic and tense arousal as well as four dimensions of task engagement (emotional, behavioral, state, and cognitive). Results indicated that, compared to silence, self-selected BGM significantly increased participants’ energetic arousal and task engagement, while decreasing response time variability. Furthermore, exploratory hierarchical Bayesian modeling analyses revealed that the effect of BGM on the false alarm rate was well explained by a model in which task engagement mediates the relationship between the presence of BGM and the false alarm rate. These findings emphasize the importance of considering the multifaceted nature of task engagement in future research examining the effects of BGM on cognitive performance, particularly in sustained attention tasks.
AndersonS. A.FullerG. B. (2010). Effect of music on reading comprehension of junior high school students. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021213
Bella-FernándezM.Martin-MoratinosM.LiC.WangP.Blasco-FontecillaH. (2024). Differences in Ex-Gaussian parameters from response time distributions between individuals with and without attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 34, 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09587-2
4.
BrodskyW.SlorZ. (2013). Background music as a risk factor for distraction among young-novice drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 59, 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.022
5.
CheahY.WongH. K.SpitzerM.CoutinhoE. (2022). Background music and cognitive task performance: A systematic review of task, music, and population impact. Music and Science, 5, 20592043221134392. https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043221134392
6.
CheeZ. J.ChangC. Y. M.CheongJ. Y.MalekF. H. B. A.HussainS.de VriesM.BellatoA. (2024). The effects of music and auditory stimulation on autonomic arousal, cognition and attention: A systematic review. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 199, 112328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112328
7.
DaviesD. R.LangL.ShackletonV. J. (1973). The effects of music and task difficulty on performance at a visual vigilance task. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 383–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01364.x
8.
DayR. F.LinC. H.HuangW. H.ChuangS. H. (2009). Effects of music tempo and task difficulty on multi-attribute decision-making: An eye-tracking approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.001
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
11.
FennellA. M.BugosJ. A.PayneB. R.SchotterE. R. (2021). Music is similar to language in terms of working memory interference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28, 512–525. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01833-5/Published
12.
Fuentes-SánchezN.PastorR.EerolaT.EscrigM. A.PastorM. C. (2022). Musical preference but not familiarity influences subjective ratings and psychophysiological correlates of music-induced emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 198, 111828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111828
13.
GronauQ. F.SingmannH.WagenmakersE. (2020). bridgesampling: An R package for estimating normalizing constants. Journal of Statistical Software, 92(10), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v092.i10
14.
HeW. J.WongW. C.HuiA. N. (2017). Emotional reactions mediate the effect of music listening on creative thinking: Perspective of the arousal-and-mood hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01680
15.
HomannL. A.DrodyA. C.SmilekD. (2023). The effects of self-selected background music and task difficulty on task engagement and performance in a visual vigilance task. Psychological Research, 87, 2460–2476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01836-6
16.
HusainG.ThompsonW. F.SchellenbergE. G. (2002). Effects of musical tempo and mode on arousal, mood, and spatial abilities. Music Perception, 20, 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2002.20.2.151
IwakiT.HayashiM.HoriT. (1997). Positive effect of the presence of music on vigilance performance. Memoirs of the Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University. IV, Science Reports, 23, 51–64.
19.
JeffreysH. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
20.
JohanssonR.HolmqvistK.MossbergF.LindgrenM. (2012). Eye movements and reading comprehension while listening to preferred and non-preferred study music. Psychology of Music, 40, 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610387777
21.
KageM. (2012). The love of the task makes one skillful: Intrinsic motivation. In KageM. (Ed.), 12 theories for understanding motivation (pp. 19–43). Kongoshuppan. (In Japanese, translated by the author of this article).
22.
KämpfeJ.SedlmeierP.RenkewitzF. (2011). The impact of background music on adult listeners: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Music, 39, 424–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610376261
23.
KirkU.NgnoumenC.ClauselA.PurvisC. K. (2022). Effects of three genres of focus music on heart rate variability and sustained attention. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 6, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-021-00226-3
24.
KissL.LinnellK. J. (2021). The effect of preferred background music on task-focus in sustained attention. Psychological Research, 85, 2313–2325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01400-6
25.
KissL.LinnellK. J. (2023). Making sense of background music listening habits: An arousal and task-complexity account. Psychology of Music, 51, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356221089017
26.
KissL.LinnellK. J. (2024). The role of mood and arousal in the effect of background music on attentional state and performance during a sustained attention task. Scientific Reports, 14, 9485. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60218-z
27.
KissL.SzikoraB.LinnellK. J. (2024). Music in the eye of the beholder: A pupillometric study on preferred background music, attentional state, and arousal. Psychological Research, 88, 1616–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01963-8
28.
LewisF. C.ReeveR. A.KellyS. P.JohnsonK. A. (2017). Sustained attention to a predictable, unengaging Go/No-Go task shows ongoing development between 6 and 11 years. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 79, 1726–1741. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1351-4
29.
Martínez-PérezV.TortajadaM.PalmeroL. B.CampoyG.FuentesL. J. (2022). Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation over right-DLPFC on vigilance tasks depend on the arousal level. Scientific Reports, 12, 547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04607-8
30.
MatthewsG.JonesD. M.ChamberlainA. G. (1990). Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 17–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02343.x
31.
MishlerS.ChenJ. (2024). Boring but demanding: Using secondary tasks to counter the driver vigilance decrement for partially automated driving. Human Factors, 66, 1798–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231168697
32.
OdaY.TakanoR.AbeT.KikuchiK. (2015). Development of the Emotion and Arousal Checklist (EACL). The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 85, 579–589. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.85.13231
33.
OkenB. S.SalinskyM. C.ElsasS. M. (2006). Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: Physiological basis and measurement. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 1885–1901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.017
34.
PattynN.NeytX.HenderickxD.SoetensE. (2008). Psychophysiological investigation of vigilance decrement: Boredom or cognitive fatigue?Physiology and Behavior, 93, 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.09.016
35.
PerhamN.VizardJ. (2011). Can preference for background music mediate the irrelevant sound effect?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 625–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1731
36.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
37.
RobertsonI. H.ManlyT.AndradeJ.BaddeleyB. T.YiendJ. (1997). “Oops!”: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8
38.
SchellenbergE. G.NakataT.HunterP. G.TamotoS. (2007). Exposure to music and cognitive performance: Tests of children and adults. Psychology of Music, 35, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607068885
39.
SmallwoodJ.DaviesJ. B.HeimD.FinniganF.SudberryM.O’ConnorR.ObonsawinM. (2004). Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 657–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.06.003
Stan Development Team. (2025). RStan: The R interface to Stan (R package version 2.32.7). https://mc-stan.org/
42.
ThompsonW. F.SchellenbergE. G.HusainG. (2001). Arousal, mood, and the Mozart effect. Psychological Science, 12, 248–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00345
43.
ThompsonW. F.SchellenbergE. G.LetnicA. K. (2012). Fast and loud background music disrupts reading comprehension. Psychology of Music, 40, 700–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735611400173
44.
ThomsonD. R.BenserD.SmilekD. (2015). A Resource-control account of sustained attention: Evidence from mind-wondering and vigilance paradigms. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614556681
45.
ThomsonD. R.SeliP.BesnerD.SmilekD. (2014). On the link between mind wandering and task performance over time. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.001
46.
ToyamaM. (2018). Engagement and task performance: Development of the engagement scale for task performance. Tsukuba Psychological Research, 56, 13–20.
47.
ÜnalA. B.De WaardD.EpstudeK.StegL. (2013). Driving with music: Effects on arousal and performance. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 21, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.09.004
48.
ÜnalA. B.StegL.EpstudeK. (2012). The influence of music on mental effort and driving performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 48, 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.01.022
49.
van den BoschI.SalimpoorV. N.ZatorreR. J. (2013). Familiarity mediates the relationship between emotional arousal and pleasure during music listening. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 534. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00534
YerkesR. M.DodsonJ. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503
