Two artist-level chamber music coaches wore eye-tracking glasses while teaching a chamber rehearsal, then participated in two interviews to discuss their teaching – first, immediately after the rehearsal, then approximately 2 weeks later, while watching their lesson videos and eye-tracking recordings. Teachers’ eye movements revealed rich networks of rapid information tracking and goal-directed attention, but both teachers struggled to articulate details of their thinking or their attention allocation, suggesting that they conceive of their teaching behaviors in a broad construal, and the complex attentional behaviors detected in their gaze behavior occurred unconsciously. This is among the first studies to explore attentional mechanisms that underlie expert music teaching in context, specifically analyzing teachers’ momentary attention allocation among several students in relation to specific proximal performance goals. Results illustrate how teachers solved intricate problems, decided what to pursue, and kept track of multiple students in ways that are inaccessible via overt behavior observation. Comparing gaze behavior to interview data suggests that these teachers’ descriptions of their thinking may be incomplete representations of their pedagogical expertise.
AndersonB. A. (2016). The attention habit: How reward learning shapes attentional selection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12957
2.
BednarikR.SchulteC.BuddeL.HeinemannB.VrzakovaH. (2018). Eye-movement modeling examples in source code comprehension: A classroom study. Proceedings of the 18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3279720.3279722
3.
BilalićM. (2017). The neuroscience of expertise. Cambridge University Press.
4.
CavittM. E. (2003). A descriptive analysis of error correction in instrumental music rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(3), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345375
5.
ChiM. T.GlaserR.FarrM. J. (2009). The nature of expertise (Transferred to digital print). Psychology Press.
6.
ColpritE. J. (2000). Observation and analysis of Suzuki string teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345394
7.
DessusP.CosnefroyO.LuengoV. (2016). “Keep your eyes on ’em all!”: A mobile eye-tracking analysis of teachers’ sensitivity to students. In VerbertK.SharplesM.KlobučarT. (Eds.), Adaptive and Adaptable Learning (Vol. 9891, pp. 72–84). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_6
8.
Drai-ZerbibV.BaccinoT.BigandE. (2012). Sight-reading expertise: Cross-modality integration investigated using eye tracking. Psychology of Music, 40(2), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610394710
9.
DukeR. A. (1994). Bringing the art of rehearsal into focus: The rehearsal frame as a model for prescriptive analysis of rehearsal conducting. Journal of Band Research, 30(1), 78–95.
10.
DukeR. A. (2009). Intelligent music teaching: Essays on the core principles of effective instruction. Learning and Behavior Resources.
DukeR. A.ChapmanD. L. (2016). Changing learners: The nature of expertise in music teaching. In Advances in social-psychology and music education research (pp. 53–62). Routledge .
13.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L. (2006). The nature of expertise: Narrative descriptions of 19 common elements observed in the lessons of three renowned artist-teachers. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 170, 7–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40319345
14.
EllisJ. J.GlaholtM. G.ReingoldE. M. (2011). Eye movements reveal solution knowledge prior to insight. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(3), 768–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.12.007
15.
EmeryN. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(6), 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00025-7
EndsleyM. R. (2018). Expertise and situation awareness. In EricssonK. A.HoffmanR. R.KozbeltA.WilliamsA. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 714–742). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748.037
18.
EricssonK. A. (Ed.). (2006a). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press.
19.
EricssonK. A. (2006b). Protocol analysis and expert thought: Concurrent verbalizations of thinking during experts’ performance on representative tasks. In EricssonK. A.CharnessN.FeltovichP. J.HoffmanR. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 223–242). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.013
20.
GegenfurtnerA.LehtinenE.SäljöR. (2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 523–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7
21.
GegenfurtnerA.LehtinenE.JarodzkaH.SäljöR. (2017). Effects of eye movement modeling examples on adaptive expertise in medical image diagnosis. Computers & Education, 113, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.001
22.
GidlöfK.WallinA.DewhurstR.HolmqvistK. (2013). Using eye tracking to trace a cognitive process: Gaze behaviour during decision making in a natural environment. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.6.1.3
23.
GoolsbyT. W. (1996). Time use in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of experienced, novice, and student teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(4), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345442
24.
GoolsbyT. W. (1997). Verbal instruction in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of three career levels and preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345463
25.
GoolsbyT. W. (1999). A comparison of expert and novice music teachers’ preparing identical band compositions: An operational replication. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(2), 174–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345722
26.
GuanZ.LeeS.CuddihyE.RameyJ. (2006). The validity of the stimulated retrospective think-aloud method as measured by eye tracking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1253–1262). https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124961
27.
HaatajaE. (2021). Understanding the role of gaze in momentary teacher-student scaffolding interaction during collaborative problem solving. https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/324085
28.
HaatajaE.Garcia Moreno-EstevaE.SalonenV.LaineA.ToivanenM.HannulaM. S. (2019). Teacher’s visual attention when scaffolding collaborative mathematical problem solving. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102877
29.
HamletC. C.AxelrodS.KuerschnerS. (1984). Eye contact as an antecedent to compliant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17(4), 553–557. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1984.17-553
HayhoeM. M.McKinneyT.ChajkaK.PelzJ. B. (2012). Predictive eye movements in natural vision. Experimental Brain Research, 217(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2979-2
32.
HeinsenR. S. (2024). Gaze behavior reveals automaticity and attention allocation during music teaching vs. observing. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.17.2.3
33.
HenryA.ThorsenC. (2018). Teacher–student relationships and L2 motivation. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 218–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12446
34.
HickenL. K. (2019). Analyses of gaze in music tasks: Score reading and observations of instrumental performance. https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/5303
35.
HickenL. K.DukeR. A. (2022). Differences in attention allocation in relation to music teacher experience and expertise. Journal of Research in Music Education, 70(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224294221096701
36.
HindsP. J. (1999). The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.5.2.205
37.
HindsP. J.PattersonM.PfefferJ. (2001). Bothered by abstraction: The effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1232–1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1232
38.
HindsP. J.PfefferJ. (2002). Why organizations don’t “know what they know”: Cognitive and motivational factors affecting the transfer of expertise. In AckermanM. S.PipekV.WulfV. (Eds.), Sharing expertise. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6208.003.0004
39.
HolmqvistK.NyströmM.AnderssonR.DewhurstR.JarodzkaH.Van de WeijerJ. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. OUP Oxford.
40.
HüttermannS.NoëlB.MemmertD. (2018). Eye tracking in high-performance sports: Evaluation of its application in expert athletes. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 17(2), 182–203. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijcss-2018-0011
41.
HyrskykariA.OvaskaS.MajarantaP.RäihäK.-J.LehtinenM. (2008). Gaze path stimulation in retrospective think-aloud. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.2.4.5
42.
JónassonP.KristjánssonÁ.JóhannessonÓ. I. (2022). Musical expertise, musical style, and visual attention. Psychology of Music, 50(1), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735620988882
43.
KaakinenJ. K. (2021). What can eye movements tell us about visual perception processes in classroom contexts? Commentary on a special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09573-7
KrebsM.-C.SchülerA.ScheiterK. (2019). Just follow my eyes: The influence of model-observer similarity on Eye Movement Modeling Examples. Learning and Instruction, 61, 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.10.005
46.
KundelH. L.NodineC. F.ConantE. F.WeinsteinS. P. (2007). Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: Gaze-tracking study. Radiology, 242(2), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2422051997
47.
KurkiK.JärvenojaH.JärveläS.MykkänenA. (2016). How teachers co-regulate children’s emotions and behaviour in socio-emotionally challenging situations in day-care settings. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.02.002
LandyD. (2018). Perception in expertise. In EricssonK. A.HoffmanR. R.KozbeltA.WilliamsA. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 151–164). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748.010
LedgerwoodA.TropeY.ChaikenS. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019843
52.
LehmannA. C. (1997). The acquisition of expertise in music: Efficiency of deliberate practice as a moderating variable in accounting for sub-expert performance. Perception and Cognition of Music, 16, l–187.
53.
LesgoldA.GlaserR.RubinsonH.FeltovichP.KlopferD.WangY. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing X-Ray pictures. In The nature of expertise (pp. 311–342). Psychology Press.
54.
MarcumT. D. (2017). Perceptual acuity and music teaching: Tracking teacher gaze [Doctoral dissertation]. https://doi.org/10.15781/T2901ZX98
55.
McIntyreN. A.MainhardM. T.KlassenR. M. (2017). Are you looking to teach? Cultural, temporal and dynamic insights into expert teacher gaze. Learning and Instruction, 49, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.005
56.
McIntyreN. A.MulderK. T.MainhardM. T. (2020). Looking to relate: Teacher gaze and culture in student-rated teacher interpersonal behaviour. Social Psychology of Education, 23(2), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09541-2
57.
MonteroB. G. (2016). Thought in action: Expertise and the conscious mind. Oxford University Press.
58.
MoranA.CampbellM.TonerJ. (2019). Exploring the cognitive mechanisms of expertise in sport: Progress and prospects. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.019
59.
OrquinJ. L.Mueller LooseS. (2013). Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.003
60.
PanchukD.VineS.VickersJ. N. (2015). Eye tracking methods in sport expertise. In Routledge handbook of sport expertise (pp. 176–187). Routledge.
61.
PenttinenM.HuovinenE. (2011). The early development of sight-reading skills in adulthood: A study of eye movements. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(2), 196–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429411405339
62.
PosnerM. I. (1970). Abstraction and the process of recognition. In BowerG. H.SpenceJ. T. (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 3, pp. 43–100). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60397-7
63.
PuurtinenM. (2018). Eye on music reading: A methodological review of studies from 1994 to 2017. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.11.2.2
64.
ReingoldE. M.CharnessN. (2005). Perception in chess: Evidence from eye movements. In UnderwoodG. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 325–354). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198566816.003.0014
65.
ReingoldE. M.SheridanH. (2011). Eye movements and visual expertise in chess and medicine. In LiversedgeS. P.GilchristI.EverlingS. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Eye Movements (pp. 524–550). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199539789.013.0029
66.
RoeslerR. A. (2022). Fantastic four! Problem-solving processes of a professional string quartet. Psychology of Music, 50(2), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735621998746
67.
RussR. S.LunaM. J. (2013). Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 284–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21063
68.
SalviC.BricoloE.FranconeriS. L.KouniosJ.BeemanM. (2015). Sudden insight is associated with shutting out visual inputs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1814–1819. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0845-0
69.
SchultzW. (2000). Multiple reward signals in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/35044563
70.
SiebenalerD. J. (1997). Analysis of teacher-student interactions in the piano lessons of adults and children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345462
71.
SteinbachA. L.GamacheD. L.JohnsonR. E. (2019). Don’t get it misconstrued: Executive construal-level shifts and flexibility in the upper echelons. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 871–895. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0273
72.
SumerO.GoldbergP.SturmerK.SeidelT.GerjetsP.TrautweinU.KasneciE. (2018). Teachers’ perception in the classroom. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (pp. 2315–2324).
73.
ToddE. D. (2017). The effect of expert guided eye gaze on novice instrumental music teachers’ observations of middle school band rehearsals (Doctoral dissertation). University of Alabama. http://ir.ua.edu/han-dle/123456789/3223
74.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
75.
van den BogertN.van BruggenJ.KostonsD.JochemsW. (2014). First steps into understanding teachers’ visual perception of classroom events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.09.001
76.
Van GogT.PaasF.Van MerriënboerJ. J. G. (2005). Uncovering expertise-related differences in troubleshooting performance: Combining eye movement and concurrent verbal protocol data. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1112
77.
van MarlenT.van WermeskerkenM.JarodzkaH.van GogT. (2018). Effectiveness of eye movement modeling examples in problem solving: The role of verbal ambiguity and prior knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 58, 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.005
78.
WolffC. E.JarodzkaH.van den BogertN.BoshuizenH. P. A. (2016). Teacher vision: Expert and novice teachers’ perception of problematic classroom management scenes. Instructional Science, 44(3), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9367-z
79.
WolffC. E.van den BogertN.JarodzkaH.BoshuizenH. P. A. (2015). Keeping an eye on learning: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ representations of classroom management events. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114549810
80.
YarbroughC.PriceH. E. (1981). Prediction of performer attentiveness based on rehearsal activity and teacher behavior. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344994
81.
YarbusA. L. (Ed.). (1967). Eye movements during perception of complex objects. In Eye movements and vision (pp. 171–211). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-7_8
82.
YuC.WangE. M.LiW.-C.BraithwaiteG. (2014). Pilots’ visual scan patterns and situation awareness in flight operations. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 85(7), 708–714. https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.3847.2014
83.
ZhaiX.ChuX.WangM.TsaiC.-C.LiangJ.-C.SpectorJ. M. (2024). A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02987-6
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
