Resonance in piano fingering: Interplay of action and observation in playing scale passages from Beethoven’s piano works

Abstract

This study examines how pianists interact with various fingering suggestions when making their fingering decisions. In semi-structured online interviews, 20 classically trained pianists responded to unfingered scores, fingered scores, and video recordings of four scale passages from Beethoven’s piano works while considering physical constraints, interpretive judgments, and embodied habits in deciding their fingerings. Rather than automatically accepting suggestions, the participants critically evaluated them, and the responses ranged from disagreement to the realization of alternatives. This study highlights scores and recordings as historically mediating agents connecting various influences on pianists’ decision-making. While negotiable, standard fingering tends to strongly influence choices as collective embodied knowledge. Pianists act as both executors and reflective observers, selecting and attuning to external and embodied influences. This study conceptualizes this dynamic network of relationships in solo piano playing as resonance—selective engagement through which pianists negotiate between personal preferences and external influences.

Keywords

piano fingering resonance scale passages standard fingering motor resonance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adu

(2019). A step-by-step guide to qualitative data coding. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351044516

Ammirante

Thompson

W. F.

(2012). Continuation tapping to triggered melodies: Motor resonance effects of melodic motion. Experimental Brain Research, 216(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2907-5

Bach

C. P. E.

(1753/1949). Essay on the true art of playing keyboard instruments ( Mitchell

W. J.

, Trans., Ed.). W. W. Norton.

Baily

(1990). The role of a motor grammar in musical performance. In Wilson

F. R.

Roehmann

F. L.

(Eds.), Music and child development: The biology of music making: Proceedings of the 1987 Denver conference (pp. 202–213). MMB Music.

Bamberger

(1976). The musical significance of Beethoven’s fingerings in the piano sonatas. Music Forum, 4, 237–280.

Barrett

(2006). “Creative collaboration”: An “eminence” study of teaching and learning in music composition. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735606061852

Bennett

(2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623

Bianco

Novembre

Keller

P. E.

Villringer

Sammler

(2018). Musical genre-dependent behavioural and EEG signatures of action planning. A comparison between classical and jazz pianists. NeuroImage, 169, 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.058

Bilson

(2008). Fingerings in Urtext editions. International Piano, 57, 35–39.

10.

Born

(2005). On musical mediation: Ontology, technology and creativity. Twentieth-century Music, 2(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857220500023X

11.

Borroni

Gorini

Riva

Bouchard

Cerri

(2011). Mirroring avatars: Dissociation of action and intention in human motor resonance. European Journal of Neuroscience, 34(4), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07779.x

12.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

13.

Braun

Clarke

(2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

14.

Byrne

(2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

15.

Cahour

Licoppe

(2010). Confrontations with traces of one’s own activity. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.010.000a

16.

Cahour

Salembier

Zouinar

(2016). Analyzing lived experience of activity. Le Travail Humain, 79(3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.3917/th.793.0259

17.

Candidi

Sacheli

L. M.

Mega

Aglioti

S. M.

(2014). Somatotopic mapping of piano fingering errors in sensorimotor experts: TMS studies in pianists and visually trained musically naïves. Cerebral Cortex, 24(2), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs325

18.

Chaffin

Imreh

(2002). Practicing perfection: Piano performance as expert memory. Psychological Science, 13(4), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00462

19.

Clarke

Parncutt

Raekallio

Sloboda

(1997). Talking fingers: An interview study of pianists’ views on fingering. Musicae Scientiae, 1(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/102986499700100106

20.

Clarke

E. F.

Doffman

(2017). Distributed creativity: Collaboration and improvisation in contemporary music. Oxford University Press.

21.

Cook

(2013). Beyond the score: Music as performance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199357406.001.0001

22.

Czerny

(1839). Complete theoretical and practical piano forte school: From the first rudiments of playing to the highest and most refined state of cultivation, with the requisite numerous examples newly and expressly composed for the occasion: Opus 500 ( Hamilton

J. A.

, Trans., Vol. 1). R. Cocks.

23.

D’Ausilio

Altenmüller

Belardinelli

M. O.

Lotze

(2006). Cross-modal plasticity of the motor cortex while listening to a rehearsed musical piece. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24(3), 955–958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04960.x

24.

D’Ausilio

Novembre

Fadiga

Keller

P. E.

(2015). What can music tell us about social interaction? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.005

25.

Davidson

J. W.

Good

J. M. M.

(2002). Social and musical co-ordination between members of a string quartet: An exploratory study. Psychology of Music, 30(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735602302005

26.

De Souza

. (2017). Music at hand: Instruments, bodies, and cognition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190271114.001.0001

27.

Gallese

Sinigaglia

(2018). Embodied resonance. In Newen

Bruin

L. D.

Gallagher

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 417–432). Oxford University Press. https://doi-org.eproxy.lib.hku.hk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.22

28.

Gibson

J. J.

(1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin.

29.

Gordon

C. L.

Iacoboni

Balasubramaniam

(2018). Multimodal music perception engages motor prediction: A TMS study. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, Article 736. https://doi.org/10.1101/358507

30.

Heft

(2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

31.

Hogeveen

Obhi

S. S.

(2012). Social interaction enhances motor resonance for observed human actions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(17), 5984–5989. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5938-11.2012

32.

Hutchins

(1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.

33.

Jacobs

J. P.

(2001). Refinements to the ergonomic model for keyboard fingering of Parncutt, Sloboda, Clarke, Raekallio, and Desain. Music Perception, 18(4), 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2001.18.4.505

34.

James

(1890). The principles of psychology (Vols.1–2). Henry Holt and Company.

35.

Kilner

J. M.

Friston

K. J.

Frith

C. D.

(2007). Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0170-2

36.

Kim

(2025). Piano fingering and the embodied expression of bodily effort. Journal of Musicological Research, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01411896.2025.2505871

37.

Kramer

(2012). The virtuoso body; or, the two births of musical performance. In Hawkins

(Ed.), Critical musicological reflections (pp. 231–244). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315575056

38.

Latour

(2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001

39.

McDonnell

T. E.

Bail

C. A.

Tavory

(2017). A theory of resonance. Sociological Theory, 35(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275117692837

40.

Newman

W. S.

(1982). Beethoven’s fingerings as interpretive clues. Journal of Musicology, 1(2), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/763595

41.

Parncutt

Sloboda

J. A.

Clarke

E. F.

Raekallio

Desain

(1997). An ergonomic model of keyboard fingering for melodic fragments. Music Perception, 14(4), 341–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285730

42.

Petitmengin

Remillieux

Cahour

Carter-Thomas

(2013). A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(2), 654–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.004

43.

Raja

(2019). From metaphor to theory: The role of resonance in perceptual learning. Adaptive Behavior, 27(6), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712319854350

44.

Rizzolatti

Fabbri-Destro

(2008). The mirror system and its role in social cognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18(2), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.001

45.

Rizzolatti

Sinigaglia

(2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions, emotions, and experience ( Anderson

, Trans.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199217984.001.0001

46.

Rosa

(2019). Resonance: A sociology of our relationship to the world ( Wagner

, Trans.). Polity.

47.

Rosenblum

S. P.

(1988). Performance practices in classic piano music: Their principles and applications. Indiana University Press.

48.

Ryan

K. J.

Jr. Gallagher

(2020). Between ecological psychology and enactivism: Is there resonance? Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01147

49.

Sartori

Begliomini

Panozzo

Garolla

Castiello

(2014). The left side of motor resonance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 702. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00702

50.

Schiavio

Høffding

(2015). Playing together without communicating? A pre-reflective and enactive account of joint musical performance. Musicae Scientiae, 19(4), 366–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864915593333

51.

Schön

D. A.

(1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473

52.

Schütz-Bosbach

Prinz

(2007). Perceptual resonance: Action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.005

53.

Sheets-Johnstone

(2003). Kinesthetic memory. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 7(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2003.005

54.

Sloboda

J. A.

Clarke

E. F.

Parncutt

Raekallio

(1998). Determinants of finger choice in piano sight-reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.24.1.185

55.

Sudnow

(2001). Ways of the hand. MIT Press.

56.

Swinkin

(2016). Performative analysis: Reimagining music theory for performance. University of Rochester Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc16ncq

57.

Türk

D. G.

(1789/1982). School of clavier playing, or, Instructions in playing the clavier for teachers & students ( Haggh

R. H.

, Trans., Ed.). University of Nebraska Press.

58.

Uithol

van Rooij

Bekkering

Haselager

(2011). Understanding motor resonance. Social Neuroscience, 6(4), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2011.559129

59.

Volpe

D’Ausilio

Badino

Camurri

Fadiga

(2016). Measuring social interaction in music ensembles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 371(1693), 20150377. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0377

60.

Williamon

Valentine

(2002). Shifting the focus of attention between levels of musical structure. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), 493–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440143000221

61.

C. C.

Hamm

J. P.

Lim

V. K.

Kirk

I. J.

(2016). Mu rhythm suppression demonstrates action representation in pianists during passive listening of piano melodies. Experimental Brain Research, 234(8), 2133–2139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4615-7

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB