When performing music of earlier eras, musicians commonly perform on period instruments, yet there is limited empirical evidence regarding listeners’ perceptions of those instruments compared with modern instruments. In two experiments, we examined listeners’ preferences for Baroque violin music performed on period and modern instruments. In Experiment 1, collegiate musicians listened to an excerpt from Telemann’s Concerto à 4 Violini No. 1 performed both on period instruments and modern instruments and indicated which performance they preferred. Results revealed a small but nonsignificant preference for the period instruments and participants explained that their preferences were primarily due to elements related to tuning, intonation, and key. In Experiment 2, participants listened to both recordings and rated their enjoyment and perceived performance quality. However, participants heard one of the three types of framing information (congruent, incongruent, or none) regarding the instruments used in the recording (period vs. modern instruments). Participants provided significantly higher enjoyment ratings when they were told they were listening to period instrument recordings, whether or not they actually heard period instruments. However, significant condition by order interaction effects indicate that participants’ perceptions were further influenced by the order of recordings.
ArsenaultV. P. (2001). A pedagogical edition and performer’s guide to J. S. Bach’s Cello Suites (BWV 1007-1010) transcribed for the violin (Publication No. 3004416) [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
2.
AydoganG.FlaigN.RaviS. N.LargeE. W.McClureS. M.MargulisE. H. (2018). Overcoming bias: Cognitive control reduces susceptibility to framing effects in evaluating musical performance. Scientific Reports, 8, Article 6229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24528-3
3.
BangertD.SchubertE.FabianD. (2009). Decision-making in unpracticed and practiced performances of baroque violin music. In StevensC.SchubertE.KruithofB.BuckleyK.FazioS. (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on music communication science (pp. 3–6). University of Western Sydney.
4.
BarclayR. L. (2011). Stradivarius pseudoscience: The myth of the miraculous musical instrument. Skeptic, 16(2), 45–50.
5.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
6.
BennettD.GinsborgJ. (2018). Audience reactions to the program notes of unfamiliar music. Psychology of Music, 46(4), 588–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617721339
7.
Bruine de BruinW. (2005). Save the last dance for me: Unwanted serial position effects in jury evaluations. Acta Psychologica, 118(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.08.005
8.
ChenantaisJ. (1927). Le violoniste et le violon. L. Durance.
DilworthJ. (1992). The violin and bow – Origins and development. In StowellR. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to the violin (pp. 1–29). Cambridge University Press.
11.
DoningtonR. (1973). A performer’s guide to Baroque music. Faber and Faber.
12.
DuerksenG. L. (1972). Some effects of expectation on evaluation of recorded musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 20(2), 268–272. https://doi.org/10.2307/3344093
13.
EloS.KääriäinenM.KansteO.PölkkiT.UtriainenK.KyngäsH. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. Sage Open, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633
FabianD.SchubertE. (2009). Baroque expressiveness and stylishness in three recordings of the D minor Sarabanda for solo violin (BWV 1004) by J. S. Bach. Music Performance Research, 3, 36–56. https://musicperformanceresearch.org/
17.
FabianD.SchubertE.PulleyR. (2010). A Baroque Träumerei: The performance and perception of two violin renditions. Musicology Australia, 32(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/08145851003793986
18.
FieseR. K. (1990). The effects of nonmusical cues on the rankings of music scores by undergraduate conducting students based on judgments of quality. Journal of Band Research, 25(2), 13–21.
19.
FischingerT.KaufmannM.SchlotzW. (2020). If it’s Mozart, it must be good? The influence of textual information and age on musical appreciation. Psychology of Music, 48(4), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735618812216
20.
FritzC.CurtinJ.PoitevineauJ.BorsarelloH.WollmanI.TaoF.-C.GhasarossianT. (2014). Soloist evaluations of six old Italian and six new violins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(20), 7224–7229. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323367111
21.
FritzC.CurtinJ.PoitevineauJ.Morrel-SamuelsP.TaoF.-C. (2012). Player preferences among new and old violins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(3), 760–763. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114999109
22.
FritzC.CurtinJ.PoitevineauJ.TaoF.-C. (2017). Listener evaluations of new and old Italian violins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(21), 5395–5400. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619443114
23.
GeringerJ. M.BugajK.GeringerK. A. (2021). Irish fiddle and Western classical violin: Listener perceptions and acoustical differences. String Research Journal, 11(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/19484992211020686
24.
GjerdingenR. O.PerrottD. (2008). Scanning the dial: The rapid recognition of music genres. Journal of New Music Research, 37(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298210802479268
25.
GotliebH.KonečniV. J. (1985). The effects of instrumentation, playing style, and structure in the Goldberg Variations by Johann Sebastian Bach. Music Perception, 3(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285323
26.
HamasyanT. (2020). Space of your existence [song]. On the call within. Nonesuch Records.
27.
HaynesB. (2007). The end of early music: A period performer’s history of music for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press.
28.
HerzR. S.von ClefJ. (2001). The influence of verbal labeling on the perception of odors: Evidence for olfactory illusions?Perception, 30(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3179
KermanJ.DreyfusL.KosmanJ.RockwellJ.RosandE.TaruskinR.McGeganN. (1992). The early music debate: Ancients, moderns, postmoderns. Journal of Musicology, 10(1), 113–130. https://www.jstor.org/stable/763564
31.
KiernanF.KrauseA. E.DavidsonJ. W. (2022). The impact of biographical information about a composer on emotional responses to their music. Musicae Scientiae, 26(3), 558–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864920988883
32.
KrogerC.MargulisE. H. (2017). “But they told me it was professional”: Extrinsic factors in the evaluation of musical performance. Psychology of Music, 45(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735616642543
33.
KrumhanslC. L.IversonP. (1992). Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 739–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.739
34.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
35.
Leech-WilkinsonD. (1984). What we are doing with early music is genuinely authentic to such a small degree that the word loses most of its meaning. Early Music, 12(1), 13–16. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3127147
36.
LevinI. P.GaethG. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1086/209174
37.
MaceS. T.WagonerC. L.TeachoutD. J.HodgesD. A. (2012). Genre identification of very brief musical excerpts. Psychology of Music, 40(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610391347
38.
MantonakisA.RoderoP.LesschaeveI.HastieR. (2009). Order in choice: Effects of serial position on preferences. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1309–1312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02453.x
39.
MargulisE. H. (2010). When program notes don’t help: Music descriptions and enjoyment. Psychology of Music, 38(3), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735609351921
40.
MargulisE. H.KisidaB.GreeneJ. P. (2015). A knowing ear: The effect of explicit information on children’s experience of a musical performance. Psychology of Music, 43(4), 596–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735613510343
41.
MargulisE. H.Simchy-GrossR. (2016). Repetition enhances the musicality of randomly generated tone sequences. Music Perception, 33(4), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1525/MP.2016.33.4.509
42.
MarozeauJ.De CheveignéA. (2007). The effect of fundamental frequency on the brightness dimension of timbre. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(1), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2384910
43.
MarozeauJ.De CheveignéA.McAdamsS.WinsbergS. (2003). The dependency of timbre on fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(5), 2946–2957. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1618239
44.
MatsutaniA. (2004). Comparison between modern violin bridge and Baroque violin bridge by photoelastic observation and frequency analysis. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 43(5R), 2754–2755. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.43.2754
45.
PaliscaC. (2001). Baroque. In SadieS.TyrrellJ. (Eds.), The New Grove dictionary of music and musicians (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 749–756). Macmillan Publishers.
46.
PascallR. (2001). Style. In SadieS.TyrrellJ. (Eds.), The New Grove dictionary of music and musicians (2nd ed., Vol. 24, pp. 638–642). Macmillan Publishers.
47.
SamsonJ. (2001). Genre. In SadieS.TyrrellJ. (Eds.), The New Grove dictionary of music and musicians (2nd ed., Vol. 9, pp. 657–659). Macmillan Publishers.
SchubertE.FabianD. (2006). The dimensions of Baroque music performance: A semantic differential study. Psychology of Music, 34(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735606068105
50.
SchulengergD. (2022). Telemann as “general kapellmeister” to the Bach family. In HirschmannW.ZohnS. (Eds.), Telemann studies (pp. 215–233). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108663472.011
51.
ShermanB. D. (2003). Inside early music: Conversations with performers. Oxford University Press.
52.
SpringerD. G.GeringerJ. M. (2023, August24–28). Baroque and modern violins: Listener perceptions of intonation and tone quality [Poster session]. International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Tokyo, Japan.
53.
SpringerD. G.SorensonR. A. (2024). Evaluations of solo piano performances: The role of performing with and without a musical score. Psychology of Music. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356241259119
54.
StroughJ.KarnsT. E.SchlosnagleL. (2011). Decision-making heuristics and biases across the life span. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06208.x
55.
TarlingJ. (2001). Baroque string playing for ingenious learners. Corda Music.
56.
TaruskinR. (1984). The authenticity movement can become a positivistic purgatory, literalistic and dehumanizing. Early Music, 12(1), 3–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3127146
57.
TaruskinR. (1995). Text and act: Essays on music and performance. Oxford University Press.
58.
VurmaA.RajuM.KuudaA. (2011). Does timbre affect pitch? Estimations by musicians and non-musicians. Psychology of Music, 39(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610373602
59.
WapnickJ.KeechK.RyanG. (2012). Preferences for piano versus harpsichord performances in Renaissance and Baroque keyboard music. Psychology of Music, 40(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735610376467
WilsonN. (2014). The art of re-enchantment: Making early music in the modern age. Oxford University Press.
62.
ZhangY.ZhouZ.SunM. (2022). Influence of musical elements on the perception of ‘Chinese style’ in music. Cognitive Computation and Systems, 4(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1049/ccs2.12036
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
