Separate voice part perception has been shown in polyphonic music. However, it remains unclear whether this segregation of voice parts is specific to polyphony or also occurs in homophonic music. This study compared voice part perceptions in polyphony and homophony using a redundant signals effect (RSE) paradigm. The RSE means that reaction times are shorter for two simultaneously presented signals than for one of these signals. At the final position of the four-voice homophonic and polyphonic sequences, notes in two voice parts were altered to out-of-key notes independently or simultaneously. Participants (N = 208) responded to any deviant tones while withholding responses to non-deviant tones. All combinations of deviant voice parts (i.e., soprano–bass, tenor–bass, and alto–tenor) elicited RSEs in polyphonic and homophonic sequences, suggesting separate voice part perception, irrespective of musical texture. However, evidence of the coactivation of separate perceptual modules was obtained only for polyphonic sequences. Deviants in higher voice parts were detected faster and more accurately than those in lower voice parts in both musical textures. These results indicate that voice parts are perceived separately, with a bias toward higher voice parts in both musical textures, but voice parts are more segregated in polyphony.
AlainC.ArnottS. R.PictonT. W. (2001). Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(5), 1072–1089. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.5.1072
2.
BakerD. H.VilidaiteG.LygoF. A.SmithA. K.FlackT. R.GouwsA. D.AndrewsT. J. (2021). Power contours: Optimizing sample size and precision in experimental psychology and human neuroscience. Psychological Methods, 26(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000337
3.
BarrettK. C.AshleyR.StraitD. L.SkoeE.LimbC. J.KrausN. (2021). Multi-voiced music bypasses attentional limitations in the brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, Article 588914. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.588914
BigandE.ParncuttR.LerdahlF. (1996). Perception of musical tension in short chord sequences: The influence of harmonic function, sensory dissonance, horizontal motion, and musical training. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205482
6.
BregmanA. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. The MIT Press.
7.
BregmanA. S.CampbellJ. (1971). Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89(2), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031163
8.
BregmanA. S.LiaoC.LevitanR. (1990). Auditory grouping based on fundamental frequency and formant peak frequency. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084255
9.
BregmanA. S.PinkerS. (1978). Auditory streaming and the building of timbre. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 32(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081664
10.
CusackR.RobertsB. (2000). Effects of differences in timbre on sequential grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(5), 1112–1120. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212092
11.
DeikeS.Gaschler-MarkefskiB.BrechmannA.ScheichH. (2004). Auditory stream segregation relying on timbre involves left auditory cortex. NeuroReport, 15(9), 1511–1514. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000132919.12990.34
12.
DewittL. A.CrowderR. G. (1987). Tonal fusion of consonant musical intervals: The oomph in Stumpf. Perception & Psychophysics, 41(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208216
13.
DisbergenN. R.ValenteG.FormisanoE.ZatorreR. J. (2018). Assessing top-down and bottom-up contributions to auditory stream segregation and integration with polyphonic music. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, Article 121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00121
EriksenB. A.EriksenC. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_9085
16.
EriksenC. W. (1988). A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(2), 191–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1977.00363.x
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
18.
FiedlerA.SchröterH.UlrichR. (2011). Coactive processing of dimensionally redundant targets within the auditory modality?Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000065
FujiokaT.TrainorL. J.RossB. (2008). Simultaneous pitches are encoded separately in auditory cortex: An MMNm study. NeuroReport, 19(3), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f51d91
21.
FujiokaT.TrainorL. J.RossB.KakigiR.PantevC. (2005). Automatic encoding of polyphonic melodies in musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(10), 1578–1592. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892905774597263
22.
GondanM. (2010). A permutation test for the race model inequality. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.23
23.
GondanM.MinakataK. (2016). A tutorial on testing the race model inequality. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78(3), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-1018-y
GriceG. R.CanhamL.BoroughsJ. M. (1984). Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 35(5), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203922
26.
HausfeldL.DisbergenN. R.ValenteG.ZatorreR. J.FormisanoE. (2021). Modulating cortical instrument representations during auditory stream segregation and integration with polyphonic music. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, Article 635937. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.635937
27.
HoveM. J.MarieC.BruceI. C.TrainorL. J. (2014). Superior time perception for lower musical pitch explains why bass-ranged instruments lay down musical rhythms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(28), 10383–10388. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402039111
28.
HuberthM.FujiokaT. (2017). Neural representation of a melodic motif: Effects of polyphonic contexts. Brain and Cognition, 111, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2016.11.003
29.
HuronD. (1989). Voice denumerability in polyphonic music of homogeneous timbres. Music Perception, 6(4), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285438
30.
HuronD. (1991). Tonal consonance versus tonal fusion in polyphonic sonorities. Music Perception, 9(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285526
31.
HuronD. (2001). Tone and voice: A derivation of the rules of voice-leading from perceptual principles. Music Perception, 19(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2001.19.1.1
32.
HuronD. (2008). Asynchronous preparation of tonally fused intervals in polyphonic. Empirical Musicology Review, 3(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.18061/1811/31695
33.
HuronD.FantiniD. A. (1989). The avoidance of inner-voice entries: Perceptual evidence and musical practice. Music Perception, 7(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285447
34.
IshidaK.NittonoH. (2024). Multidimensional regularity processing in music: An examination using redundant signals effect. Experimental Brain Research, 242, 2207–2217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06861-4
35.
JanataP. (1995). ERP measures assay the degree of expectancy violation of harmonic contexts in music. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1995.7.2.153
36.
JanataP.TillmannB.BharuchaJ. J. (2002). Listening to polyphonic music recruits domain-general attention and working memory circuits. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.2.2.121
37.
LuceR. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford University Press.
38.
MarieC.FujiokaT.HerringtonL.TrainorL. J. (2012). The high-voice superiority effect in polyphonic music is influenced by experience: A comparison of musicians who play soprano-range compared with bass-range instruments. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 22(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030858
39.
MicheylC.HansonC.DemanyL.ShammaS.OxenhamA. J. (2013). Auditory stream segregation for alternating and synchronous tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(6), 1568–1580. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0032241
MillerJ. (1986). Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(5), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203025
42.
MillerJ. (2004). Exaggerated redundancy gain in the split brain: A hemispheric coactivation account. Cognitive Psychology, 49(2), 118–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.12.003
43.
MillerJ.UlrichR. (2003). Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: A parallel grains model. Cognitive Psychology, 46(2), 101–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00517-0
44.
MordkoffJ. T.DanekR. H. (2011). Dividing attention between color and shape revisited: Redundant targets coactivate only when parts of the same perceptual object. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 73(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0025-2
45.
MordkoffJ. T.YantisS. (1993). Dividing attention between color and shape: Evidence of coactivation. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(4), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206778
46.
NäätänenR.JacobsenT.WinklerI. (2005). Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): A review of the evidence. Psychophysiology, 42(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00256.x
47.
OhY.ZuwalaJ. C.SalvagnoC. M.TilbrookG. A. (2022). The impact of pitch and timbre cues on auditory grouping and stream segregation. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, Article 725093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.725093
48.
Poulin-CharronnatB.BigandE.MadurellF. (2005). The influence of voice leading on harmonic priming. Music Perception, 22(4), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2005.22.4.613
SaupeK.KoelschS.RübsamenR. (2010). Spatial selective attention in a complex auditory environment such as polyphonic music. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(1), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3271422
51.
SchrögerE.WidmannA. (1998). Speeded responses to audiovisual signal changes result from bimodal integration. Psychophysiology, 35(6), 755–759. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577298980714
52.
SchröterH.UlrichR.MillerJ. (2007). Effects of redundant auditory stimuli on reaction time. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194025
53.
SchwitzgebelE.WhiteC. W. (2021). Effects of chord inversion and bass patterns on harmonic expectancy in musicians. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 39(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2021.39.1.41
ThompsonW. F.CuddyL. L. (1989). Sensitivity to key change in chorale sequences: A comparison of single voices and four-voice harmony. Music Perception, 7(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285455
56.
TrainorL. J.MarieC.BruceI. C.BidelmanG. M. (2014). Explaining the high voice superiority effect in polyphonic music: Evidence from cortical evoked potentials and peripheral auditory models. Hearing Research, 308, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2013.07.014
57.
Von BékésyG. (1960). Experiments in hearing. Mcgraw Hill.
58.
VosJ. (1995). Perceptual separation of simultaneous complex tones: The effect of slightly asynchronous onsets. Acta Acustica, 3(5), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.401500
59.
WallL.LieckR.NeuwirthM.RohrmeierM. (2020). The impact of voice leading and harmony on musical expectancy. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 5933. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61645-4
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
