This study investigates the effect of chord duration on the relative salience of chord-type and voicing changes. Participants (N = 111) with varying levels of musical training were presented with sequences of five block chords on the piano and asked to indicate which chord sounded most different. Each sequence consisted of three identical chords and two oddballs, one with a voicing change and one with a chord-type change. All possible chord-type pairings between standard and oddball formed of major, minor, dominant seventh, major seventh, and minor seventh chords were tested. In addition, each sequence of five chords was tested using three chord duration conditions (500, 1,000, and 1,500 ms), and the durations were pseudo-randomized throughout the experiment. Chord-type changes became more salient with longer durations and this effect could be seen for all participants regardless of their levels of musical training. However, with higher level of musical training, chord-type changes became more salient across all duration conditions. Leman’s model of tonal contextuality suggests that the effect of duration in our experiment could be explained by sensory mechanisms related to echoic memory. The potential contribution of other factors to the effect of duration is discussed.
AllenE. J.OxenhamA. J. (2014). Symmetric interactions and interference between pitch and timbre. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(3), 1371–1379. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4863269
2.
ArmitageJ.EerolaT. (2020). Reaction time data in music cognition: Comparison of pilot data from lab, crowdsourced, and convenience Web samples. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02883
3.
BharuchaJ. J.StoeckigK. (1986). Reaction time and musical expectancy: Priming of chords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(4), 403–410.
4.
BigandE.DelbéC.Poulin-CharronnatB.LemanM.TillmannB. (2014). Empirical evidence for musical syntax processing? Computer simulations reveal the contribution of auditory short-term memory. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, Article 94. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00094
5.
BigandE.MadurellF.TillmannB.PineauM. (1999). Effect of global structure and temporal organization on chord processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.184
6.
BigandE.PoulinB.TillmannB.MadurellF.D’AdamoD. A. (2003). Sensory versus cognitive components in harmonic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.159
7.
CaclinA.McAdamsS.SmithB. K.WinsbergS. (2005). Acoustic correlates of timbre space dimensions: A confirmatory study using synthetic tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(1), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1929229
8.
de ClercqT. (2022). Tempo versus average rates of harmonic rhythm in popular music: A study of three corpora. Musicae Scientiae, 27(3), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649221091483
9.
DeliègeI.MélenM.StammersD.CrossI. (1996). Musical schemata in real-time listening to a piece of music. Music Perception, 14(2), 117–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285715
10.
DifallahD.FilatovaE.IpeirotisP. (2018, February5–9). Demographics and dynamics of Mechanical Turk workers. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 135–143). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159652.3159661
11.
DunmireC. E. (2019). Audiating and vocalizing voice-leading in seventh chords: Harmonic recognition in freshman ear-training courses. Liberty University.
12.
GoldmanA.HarrisonP. M.JacksonT.PearceM. T. (2021). Reassessing syntax-related ERP components using popular music chord sequences: A model-based approach. Music Perception, 39(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2021.39.2.118
13.
GreyJ. M.GordonJ. W. (1978). Perceptual effects of spectral modifications on musical timbres. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63(5), 1493–1500. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381843
14.
HuronD.ParncuttR. (1993). An improved model of tonality perception incorporating pitch salience and echoic memory. Psychomusicology: A Journal of Research in Music Cognition, 12(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094110
15.
IversonP.KrumhanslC. L. (1993). Isolating the dynamic attributes of musical timbre. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94(5), 2595–2603. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.407371
16.
JimenezI.KuusiT.Czedik-EysenbergI.ReuterC. (2023). Identifying songs from their piano-driven opening chords. Musicae Scientiae, 27(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649211003631
17.
JimenezI.KuusiT.OjalaJ. (2022a). Relative salience of chord-type and chord-voicing changes: A two-oddball paradigm. Psychology of Music, 50(5), 1566–1585. https://doi.org/10.1177/03057356211055214
18.
JimenezI.KuusiT.OjalaJ. (2022b). Veridical and schematic memory for harmony in melody-and-accompaniment textures. Music Perception, 40(2), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2022.40.2.89
19.
KoelschS.JentschkeS.SammlerD.MietchenD. (2007). Untangling syntactic and sensory processing: An ERP study of music perception. Psychophysiology, 44(3), 476–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00517.x
20.
LakatosS. (2000). A common perceptual space for harmonic and percussive timbres. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(7), 1426–1439. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212144
21.
LehtonenH. M. (2010). Analysis, perception, and synthesis of the piano sound [PhD thesis]. Aalto University.
22.
LemanM. (2000). An auditory model of the role of short-term memory in probe-tone ratings. Music Perception, 17(4), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285830
MarmelF.TillmannB.DelbéC. (2010). Priming in melody perception: Tracking down the strength of cognitive expectations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 1016–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018735
25.
McAdamsS.WinsbergS.DonnadieuS.De SoeteG.KrimphoffJ. (1995). Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes. Psychological Research, 58(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419633
26.
McPhersonM. J.McDermottJ. H. (2020). Time-dependent discrimination advantages for harmonic sounds suggest efficient coding for memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(50), 32169–32180. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008956117
27.
MüllensiefenD.GingrasB.MusilJ.StewartL. (2014). Measuring the facets of musicality: The Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI). Personality and Individual Differences, 60, S35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.081
28.
NeesM. A. (2016). Have we forgotten auditory sensory memory? Retention intervals in studies of nonverbal auditory working memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1892. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01892
29.
PechmannT. (1998). Memory for chords: The retention of pitch and mode. Music Perception, 16(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285776
30.
RobinsonK.PattersonR. D. (1995). The duration required to identify the instrument, the octave, or the pitch chroma of a musical note. Music Perception, 13(1), 1–15.
31.
SchubertE.StevensC. (2006). The effect of implied harmony, contour and musical expertise on judgments of similarity of familiar melodies. Journal of New Music Research, 35(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298210600835000
32.
SkorikS. O.AlmayevN. A.BessonovaY. V. (2018). Towards psychophysiological mechanisms of major and minor chords perception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 131, S163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.07.432
33.
StoetG. (2010). PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1096–1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1096
34.
StoetG. (2017). PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316677643
35.
TekmanH. G.BharuchaJ. J. (1992). Time course of chord priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 51(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205071
36.
TekmanH. G.BharuchaJ. J. (1998). Implicit knowledge versus psychoacoustic similarity in priming of chords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.1.252
37.
TillmannB.BigandE. (2004). Further investigation of harmonic priming in long contexts using musical timbre as surface marker to control for temporal effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98(2), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.98.2.450-458
38.
Van NoordenL. S. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences [PhD thesis].Eindhoven University of Technology.
39.
VirtalaP.BergV.KiviojaM.PurhonenJ.SalmenkiviM.PaavilainenP.TervaniemiM. (2011). The preattentive processing of major vs. Minor chords in the human brain: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 487(3), 406–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.10.066
40.
VirtalaP.HuotilainenM.PartanenE.TervaniemiM. (2014). Musicianship facilitates the processing of Western music chords—An ERP and behavioral study. Neuropsychologia, 61, 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.028
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
