When speaking about music, the term groove can refer to objective qualities, such as rhythmic patterns, or to subjective experiences, such as the pleasurable urge to move to the music. However, the mere juxtaposition of objective musical causes and subjective psychological effects may be too simplistic to fully capture the multifaceted groove phenomenon. We therefore broaden the perspective of groove research by analyzing how people use the term groove in the everyday language of 970,220 comments on 155 YouTube music videos. The corresponding songs were previously rated on groove, operationalized as a pleasurable urge to move. Results show that groove terms were more likely to be used in comments on songs that received higher groove ratings. Resonating with the definition of groove as a pleasurable urge to move, groove terms were very likely to co-occur with movement terms, and comments mentioning groove expressed more positive sentiments. We also found that groove terms were predominantly used to describe objective musical qualities in comments on funk, soul, and R&B songs, suggesting that the use of groove is related to genre. In general, we demonstrate how text mining can be used to review existing definitions and gain new perspectives on current topics in music science.
BarberS. (2010). Smooth jazz: A case study in the relationships between commercial radio formats, audience research and music production. Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 8(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao.8.1.51_1
2.
BechtoldT. A.KilchenmannL.CurryB.WitekM. A. G. (2023). Understanding the relationship between catchiness and groove: A qualitative study with popular music creators. Music Perception, 40(5), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2023.40.5.353
3.
BerlinerP. F. (1994). Thinking in Jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. University of Chicago Press.
4.
ButterfieldM. (2010). Participatory discrepancies and the perception of beats in jazz. Music Perception, 27(3), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2010.27.3.157
5.
CâmaraG. S.DanielsenA. (2020). Groove. In RehdingA.RingsS. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical concepts in music theory (pp. 271–294). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190454746.013.17
6.
CameronD. J.DotovD.FlatenE.BosnyakD.HoveM. J.TrainorL. J. (2022). Undetectable very-low frequency sound increases dancing at a live concert. Current Biology, 32(21), R1222–R1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.09.035
7.
DanielsenA. (2006). Presence and pleasure: The funk grooves of James Brown and parliament. Wesleyan University Press.
8.
DotovD.BosnyakD.TrainorL. J. (2021). Collective music listening: Movement energy is enhanced by groove and visual social cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(6), 1037–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021821991793
9.
DumanD.NetoP.MavrolampadosA.ToiviainenP.LuckG. (2022). Music we move to: Spotify audio features and reasons for listening. PLOS ONE, 17(9), Article e0275228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275228
EavesD. L.GriffithsN.BurridgeE.McBainT.ButcherN. (2020). Seeing a drummer’s performance modulates the subjective experience of groove while listening to popular music drum patterns. Musicae Scientiae, 24(4), 475–493. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864919825776
GioiaT. (2006). Work songs. Duke University Press.
14.
HeinzlH.MittlböckM. (2003). Pseudo R-squared measures for Poisson regression models with over- or underdispersion. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 44(1), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00062-8
15.
HoskenF. (2020). The subjective, human experience of groove: A phenomenological investigation. Psychology of Music, 48(2), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735618792440
16.
HoveM. J.MartinezS. A.StupacherJ. (2020). Feel the bass: Music presented to tactile and auditory modalities increases aesthetic appreciation and body movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(6), 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000708
IyerV. (2002). Embodied mind, situated cognition, and expressive microtiming in African-American music. Music Perception, 19(3), 387–414. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2002.19.3.387
19.
JanataP.TomicS. T.HabermanJ. M. (2012). Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of the groove. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024208
KeilC. (1995). The theory of participatory discrepancies: A progress report. Ethnomusicology, 39(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/852198
24.
KowalewskiD. A.KratzerT. M.FriedmanR. S. (2020). Social music: Investigating the link between personal liking and perceived groove. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 37(4), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2020.37.4.339
25.
MacDonaldR. (2021). The social functions of music: Communication, wellbeing, art, ritual, identity and social networks (C-WARIS). In CreechA.HodgesD. A.HallamS. (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of music psychology in education and the community (pp. 5–21). Routledge.
26.
MaddenA.RuthvenI.McMenemyD. (2013). A classification scheme for content analyses of YouTube video comments. Journal of Documentation, 69(5), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2012-0078
27.
MadisonG. (2006). Experiencing groove induced by music: Consistency and phenomenology. Music Perception, 24(2), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2006.24.2.201
28.
MaloneE. (2022). Two concepts of groove: Musical nuances, rhythm, and genre. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 80(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpac020
29.
MatthewsT. E.WitekM. A. G.HeggliO. A.PenhuneV. B.VuustP. (2019). The sensation of groove is affected by the interaction of rhythmic and harmonic complexity. PLOS ONE, 14(1), Article e0204539. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204539
30.
MatthewsT. E.WitekM. A. G.LundT.VuustP.PenhuneV. B. (2020). The sensation of groove engages motor and reward networks. NeuroImage, 214, 116768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116768
31.
MehrS. A.SinghM.KnoxD.KetterD. M.Pickens-JonesD.AtwoodS.LucasC.JacobyN.EgnerA. A.HopkinsE. J.HowardR. M.HartshorneJ. K.JenningsM. V.SimsonJ.BainbridgeC. M.PinkerS.O’DonnellT. J.KrasnowM. M.GlowackiL. (2019). Universality and diversity in human song. Science, 366, eaax0868. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0868
32.
PfleidererM. (2006). Rhythmus: Psychologische, Theoretische und Stilanalytische Aspekte Populärer Musik [Rhythm: Psychological, Theoretical, and Stylistic Analytical Aspects of Popular Music]. Transcript Verlag.
33.
PlatzF.KopiezR. (2012). When the eye listens: A meta-analysis of how audio-visual presentation enhances the appreciation of music performance. Music Perception, 30(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2012.30.1.71
34.
PressingJ. (2002). Black Atlantic rhythm: Its computational and transcultural foundations. Music Perception, 19(3), 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2002.19.3.285
35.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/
SchultesP.DornerV.LehnerF. (2013). Leave a comment! An in-depth analysis of user comments on YouTube. In Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings, 42. https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2013/42
38.
SennO.BechtoldT. A.HoeslF.JerjenR.KilchenmannL.RoseD.BaldassarreA.SigristC.AlessandriE. (2023). An SEM approach to validating the psychological model of musical groove. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(3), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001087
39.
SennO.BechtoldT. A.HoeslF.KilchenmannL. (2021). Taste and familiarity affect the experience of groove in popular music. Musicae Scientiae, 25(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864919839172
40.
SennO.KilchenmannL.von GeorgiR.BullerjahnC. (2016). The effect of expert performance microtiming on listeners’ experience of groove in swing or funk music. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1487. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01487
41.
SennO.RoseD.BechtoldT.KilchenmannL.HoeslF.JerjenR.BaldassarreA.AlessandriE. (2019). Preliminaries to a psychological model of musical groove. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01228
42.
SiorosG.MironM.DaviesM.GouyonF.MadisonG. (2014). Syncopation creates the sensation of groove in synthesized music examples. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1036. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01036
StupacherJ. (2019). The experience of flow during sensorimotor synchronization to musical rhythms. Musicae Scientiae, 23(3), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864919836720
45.
StupacherJ.HoveM. J.NovembreG.Schütz-BosbachS.KellerP. E. (2013). Musical groove modulates motor cortex excitability: A TMS investigation. Brain and Cognition, 82(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.03.003
46.
StupacherJ.MatthewsT. E.Pando-NaudeV.Foster Vander ElstO.VuustP. (2022). The sweet spot between predictability and surprise: Musical groove in brain, body, and social interactions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 906190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.906190
47.
SwarbrickD.BosnyakD.LivingstoneS. R.BansalJ.Marsh-RolloS.WoolhouseM. H.TrainorL. J. (2019). How live music moves us: Head movement differences in audiences to live versus recorded music. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02682
48.
TerryP. C.KarageorghisC. I.CurranM. L.MartinO. V.Parsons-SmithR. L. (2020). Effects of music in exercise and sport: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000216
49.
ThelwallM. (2018). Social media analytics for YouTube comments: Potential and limitations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1381821
WitekM. A. G. (2017). Filling in: Syncopation, pleasure and distributed embodiment in groove. Music Analysis, 36(1), 138–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/musa.12082
52.
WitekM. A. G.ClarkeE. F.WallentinM.KringelbachM. L.VuustP. (2014). Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. PLOS ONE, 9(4), Article e94446. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094446
53.
ZbikowskiL. M. (2004). Modelling the groove: Conceptual structure and popular music. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 129(2), 272–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrma/129.2.272
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
