Attribute accessibility,normative influence,and the effect of classical and country music on willingness to pay for social identity and utilitarian products
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2022
Attribute accessibility,normative influence,and the effect of classical and country music on willingness to pay for social identity and utilitarian products
Previous studies indicate that background classical music is associated with customers in retail and leisure premises being prepared to pay more for various products and services. This online experiment tests whether these effects are due to music increasing the salience of valued product attributes (attribute accessibility hypothesis) or to a demand characteristic wherein music implies a norm to purchase expensive items (normative behavior hypothesis). A 3 (type of music—classical, country, no music, between subjects) × 2 (type of product—social identity or utilitarian, within subjects) × 2 (high vs. low incentive for accuracy, between subjects) mixed design was used in which participants stated the specific amount they would be prepared to pay for 30 products using free-choice format. Results showed a Music × Type of Product interaction, such that preparedness to spend was higher in the classical music condition but only in the case of social identity products. This is more consistent with the attribute accessibility hypothesis than the normative behavior hypothesis, and various commercial and practical consequences of these findings are discussed.
AllenP.BennettK.HeritageB. (2014). SPSS statistics version 22: A practical guide (3rd ed.). South Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Cengage Learning.
2.
AndersonJ. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295.
3.
AreniC. S. (2003a). Examining managers’ theories of how atmospheric music affects perception, behaviour and financial performance. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10, 263–274.
4.
AreniC. S. (2003b). Exploring managers’ implicit theories of atmospheric music: Comparing academic analysis to industry insight. Journal of Services Marketing, 17, 161–184.
5.
AreniC. S.KimD. (1993). The influence of background music on shopping behaviour: Classical versus top-forty music in a wine store. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 336–340.
6.
BakerJ.GrewalD.ParasuramanA. (1994). The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 328–339.
7.
BeverlandM. B.LimE. A. C.MorrisonM.TerziovskiM. (2006). In-store music and consumer-brand relationships: Relational transformation following experiences of (mis)fit. Journal of Business Research, 59, 982–989.
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
CollinsA. M.LoftusE. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
11.
DeMarqueC.CharalambidesL.HiltonD. J.WaroquierL. (2015). Nudging sustainable consumption: The use of descriptive norms to promote a minority behavior in a realistic online shopping environment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 43, 166–174.
12.
de QuidtJ.VesterlundL.WilsonA. J. (2019). Experimenter demand effects. In SchramA.UleA. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in experimental economics (pp. 384–400), Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
13.
FoxA. A. (2004). Real country: Music and language in working-class culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
14.
GuidoG.PelusoA. M.MiletiA.CapestroM.CamboL.PisanelloP. (2016). Effects of background music endings on consumer memory in advertising. International Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications, 35, 504–518.
15.
HeymanT.HutchinsonK. A.StormsG. (2016). Is semantic priming (ir)rational? Insights from the speeded word fragment completion task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 42, 1657–1663.
16.
JacobC.GueguenN.BoulbryG.SamiS. (2009). “Love is in the air”: Congruence between background music and goods in a florist. The International Review of Distribution and Consumer Research, 19, 75–79.
17.
KhalkhaliS.WammesJ.McRaeK. (2012). Integrating words that refer to typical sequences of events. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 106–114.
18.
LeeK.ShavittS. (2006). The use of cues depends on goals: Store reputation affects product judgments when social identity goals are salient. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 260–271.
19.
MeadE. L.RimalR. N.FerrenceR.CohenJ. E. (2014). Understanding the sources of normative influence on behavior: The example of tobacco. Social Science & Medicine, 115, 139–143.
20.
MillimanR. E. (1982). Using background music to affect the behavior of supermarket shoppers. Journal of Marketing, 46, 86–91.
21.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (1996). The effects of music on responses to a dining area. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 55–64.
22.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (1998). The effect of music on atmosphere and purchase intentions in a cafeteria. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 2254–2273.
23.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (1999). Music and adolescent identity. Music Education Research, 1, 75–92.
24.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (2007). Lifestyle correlates of musical preference: 3—Travel, money, education, employment, and health. Psychology of Music, 35, 473–497.
25.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J.McKendrickJ. (1999). The effect of music on in-store wine selections. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 271–276.
26.
NorthA. C.SheridanL.AreniC. S. (2016). Music congruity effects on product memory, perception, and choice. Journal of Retailing, 92, 83–95.
27.
NorthA. C.ShilcockA.HargreavesD. J. (2003). The effect of musical style on restaurant customers’ spending. Environment and Behavior, 35, 712–718.
28.
Reinoso-CarvalhoF.DakdukS.WagemansJ.SpenceC. (2019). Not just another pint! The role of emotion induced by music on the consumer’s tasting experience. Multisensory Research, 32, 367–400.
29.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2007). The content and validity of music-genre stereotypes among college students. Psychology of Music, 35, 306–326.
RookD. W.FisherR. J. (1995). Normative influences on impulsive buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 305–313.
32.
SchubertE.HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C. (2014). A dynamically minimalist cognitive explanation of musical preference: Is familiarity everything?Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 38.
33.
SekulicS.ErdelijacV.KuzinaI. (2020). Do shared semantic features facilitate lexical-semantic processing in early course psychosis?Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 34, 357–365.
34.
SoarsB. (2009). Driving sales through shoppers’ sense of sound, sight, smell and touch. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 37, 286–298.
35.
SunagaT. (2018). How the sound frequency of background music influences consumers’ perceptions and decision making. Psychology and Marketing, 35, 253–267.
36.
ZanderM. F. (2006). Musical influences in advertising: How music modifies first impressions of product endorsers and brands. Psychology of Music, 34, 465–480.
37.
ZellnerD.GellerT.LyonsS.PyperA.RiazK. (2017). Ethnic congruence and food affects food selection but not liking. Food Quality and Preference, 56, 126–129.
