Peer group effects of relational victimization and empowerment among high school instrumental music students were examined using a cross-sectional design. We evaluated the homophily hypothesis that states peer group membership influences individual-level relational aggression and feelings of empowerment. Peer groups were identified using social network analysis, suggesting that participation in marching band significantly impacts feelings of empowerment reducing self-reported relational victimization, even after controlling for gender, caring behaviors, and positive attitudes toward bullying. The impact of peer group membership suggests that future studies consider peer relations across whole school populations and subtypes of aggression.
AbrilC. R. (2013). Perspectives on the school band from hardcore American band kids. In CampbellP. S.WigginsT. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of children’s musical cultures (pp. 435–448). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
AcquavivaG. L. (2008). Protecting students from the wrongs of hazing rites: A proposal for strengthening New Jersey’s anti-hazing act. Quinnipiac Law Review, 305, 310–311.
3.
AdderleyC.KennedyM.BerzW. (2003). “A home away from home”: The world of the high school music classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 190–205.
4.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.FreemanL. C. (2002). UCINET 6.0 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
5.
BrownB. B.LarsonJ. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In LearnerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 74–103). New York, NY: Wiley.
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
CoyneS. M.OstrovJ. M. (Eds.). (2018). The development of relational aggression. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
CrickN. R.WernerN. E.CasasJ. R.O’BrienK. M.NelsonD. A.GropeterJ. K.MarkonK. (1999). Childhood aggression and gender: A new look at an old problem. In BernsteinD. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 45, pp. 75–142). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
9.
DagazM. C. (2012). Learning from the band: Trust, acceptance, and self-confidence. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41, 431–461. doi:10.1177/0891241612447813
10.
DuH.FeldmanM. W.LiS.JinX. (2007). An algorithm for detecting community structure of social networks base on prior knowledge and modularity. Complexity, 12, 53–60. doi:10.1002/cplx.20166
11.
ElpusK.CarterB. A. (2016). Bullying victimization among music ensemble and theater students in the United States. Journal of Research in Music Education, 64, 322–343. doi:10.1177/0022429416658642
12.
EnnettS. T.BaumanK. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: The case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 653–663. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.653
13.
EspelageD. L.AsidaoC. S. (2001). Conversations with middle school students about bullying and victimization: Should we be concerned?Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2, 49–62. doi:10.1300/J135v02n02_04
14.
EspelageD. L.GreenH. D.PolaninJ. (2012). Willingness to intervene in bullying episodes among middle school students: Individual and peer-group influences. Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 776–801. doi:10.1177/0272431611423017
15.
EspelageD. L.HoltM. K.HenkelR. R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205–220. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00531
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LanA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 179–191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146
17.
GirvanM.NewmanM. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 7821–7826. doi:10.1037/pnas.122653799
18.
JonesB. D. (2015). User guide for assessing the components of the MUSIC Model of Motivation. Retrieved from http://themusicmodel.com
19.
KandelD. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436.
20.
KohfeldtD.ChhunL.GraceS.LanghoutR. D. (2011). Youth empowerment in context: Exploring tensions in school-based yPAR. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47, 28–45. doi:10.1007/s10464-010-9376-z
21.
LeffS. S.WaasdorpT. E.CrickN. R. (2010). A review of existing relational aggression programs: Strengths, limitations, and future directions. School Psychology Review, 39, 508–535.
22.
LowS.EspelageD. L. (2013). Differentiating cyber bullying perpetration from other forms of peer aggression: Commonalities across race, individual, and family predictors. Psychology of Violence, 3, 39–52. doi:10.1037/a0030308
23.
LowS.PolaninJ. R.EspelageD. L. (2013). The role of social networks in physical and relational aggression among young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1078–1089. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9933-5
24.
LuengoJ.GarciaS.HerreraF. (2010). A study on the use of imputation methods for experimentation with radial basis function network classifiers handling missing attribute values: The good synergy between RBFNs and event covering method. Neural Networks, 23, 406–418. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2009.11.014
25.
MatthewsW. K. (2017). “Stand by me”: A mixed methods study of a collegiate marching band members’ intragroup beliefs throughout a performance season. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65, 179–202. doi:10.1177/0022429417694875
26.
MatthewsW. K.KitsantasA. (2007). Group cohesion, collective efficacy, and motivational climate as predictors of conductor support in music ensembles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 6–17. doi:10.1177/002242940705500102
27.
MayeuxL. (2014). Understanding popularity and relational aggression in adolescence: The role of social dominance orientation. Social Development, 23, 502–517.
28.
MorrisonS. J. (2001). The school ensemble: A culture of our own. Music Educators Journal, 88, 24–28.
29.
NewcombA. F.BagwellC. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 306–347.
30.
O’NeillS. A. (2006). Positive youth engagement. In McPhersonG. (Ed.), The child as musician: A handbook of musical development (pp. 461–474). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
O’NeillS. A. (2015). Youth empowerment and transformative music engagement. In BenedictC.SchmidtP.SpruceG.WoodfordP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social justice in music education (pp. 388–405). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
PallantJ. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Birmingham, UK: Open University Press.
33.
ParadaR. H. (2000). Adolescent peer relations instrument: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of participant roles in bullying and victimization of adolescence: An interim test manual and research monograph: A test manual. Penrith, New South Wales, Australia: Publication Unit, Self-concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation (SELF) Research Centre, University of Western Sydney.
34.
ParkesK. A.JonesB. D.WilkinsJ. L. M. (2017). Assessing music students’ motivation using the MUSIC Model of Academic Motivation Inventory. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 35, 16–22. doi:10.1177/8755123315620835
35.
PellegriniA. (2002). Bullying, victimization, and sexual harassment during the transition to middle school. Educational Psychologist, 37, 151–163. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3703_2
36.
PokhrelP.SussmanS.BlackD.SunP. (2010). Peer group self-identification as a predictor of relational and physical aggression among high school students. Journal of School Health, 80, 249–258.
37.
RawlingsJ. R. (2016). Middle school students’ perceptions of bullying. Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education, 209, 7–26. doi:10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.209.0007
38.
RawlingsJ. R. (2017). The effect of middle school music ensemble participation on the relationship between perceived school connectedness, self-reported bullying behaviors, and peer victimization. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 213, 53–72. doi:10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.213.0053
39.
RawlingsJ. R.EspelageD. L. (2019). Middle school music ensemble participation, homophobic name-calling, and mental health. Youth & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0044118X19866071
40.
RawlingsJ. R.StoddardS. A. (2019). A critical review of anti-bullying programs in North American elementary schools. Journal of School Health, 89, 759–780.
41.
RodkinP. C.FarmerR. W.PearlR.Van AckerR. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14–24. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.14
42.
RomanishB. (1991). Empowering teachers: Restructuring schools for the 21st century. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
43.
SilveiraJ. M.HudsonM. W. (2015). Hazing in the college marching band. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63, 5–27. doi:10.1177/0022429415569064
44.
SinghA. A.OrpinasP.HorneA. M. (2010). Empowering schools to prevent bullying: A holistic approach. In VernbergR. (Ed.), Preventing and treating bullying and victimization (pp. 245–265). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45.
SteinbergL. (2010). Adolescence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
46.
SteinbergL.MonahanK. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531
47.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Cranbury, NJ: Pearson.
48.
UnderwoodM. K. (2003). Social aggression among girls. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
49.
VillarruelF. A.PerkinsD. F.BordenL. M.KeithJ. G. (Eds.). (2003). Community youth development: Programs, policies, and practices. London, England: SAGE.
50.
ZimmermanM. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In SeidmannJ. R. E. (Ed.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
