Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Musical scales can be described as either an organization of scale-step degrees or as a pattern of absolute interval sizes. Even though experimental data show that these two melodic features might have different perceptual implications, not every music education method or psychology experiment separately accounts for them. The present study undertakes an investigation of scale steps, absolute interval sizes, and their cognitive role on melodic perception. The development and partial validation of a new psychometric instrument are reported, and the results are discussed in regard to its experimental and educational implications.

Keywords

intervallic awareness scale steps intervals sight-singing melodic perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Attneave

Olson

R. K.

(1971). Pitch as a medium: A new approach to psychophysical scaling. American Journal of Psychology, 84, 147–166.

Bartlett

J. C.

Dowling

W. J.

(1980). Recognition of transposed melodies: A key-distance effect in developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 501–515.

Bharucha

J. J.

Stoeckig

(1986). Reaction time and musical expectancy: Priming of chords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 403–410.

Curran

P. J.

West

S. G.

Finch

J. F.

(1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.

Dowling

W. J.

(1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85, 341–354.

Dowling

W. J.

(1986). Context effects on melody recognition: Scale-step versus interval representations. Music Perception, 3, 281–296.

Dowling

W. J.

(1991). Tonal strength and melody recognition after long and short delays. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 305–313.

Dowling

W. J.

Bartlett

J. C.

(1981). The importance of interval information in long-term memory for melodies. Psychomusicology, 1, 30–49.

Dowling

W. J.

Fujitani

D. S.

(1971). Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2), 524–531.

10.

Edlund

(1963). Modus novus. Stockholm, Sweden: Nordiska musikförlaget.

11.

Eiting

M. H.

(1984). Perceptual similarities between musical motifs. Music Perception, 2, 78–94.

12.

Etterson

Shanteau

Krogstad

(1987). Expert judgement: Is more information better? Psychological Reports, 60, 227–238.

13.

Fournier

Moreno Sala

M. T.

Dubé

O’Neill

(2019). Cognitive strategies in sight-singing: The development of an inventory for aural skills pedagogy. Psychology of Music, 47, 270–283.

14.

Goldemberg

(2011). Modus Novus e a abordagem intervalar da leitura cantada à primeira vista [Modus Novus and the Intervallic Approach to Sight-singing]. Opus, 17, 107–120.

15.

Goldemberg

(2015). Uma avaliação da abordagem ascendente para a leitura cantada à primeira vista [An evaluation of the bottom-up approach to sight singing]. Revista da Abem, 23(34), 84–94.

16.

Holmes

A. V.

(2009). Effect of fixed-do and movable-do solfege instruction on the development of sight-singing skills in 7- and 8-year-old children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville.

17.

Hung

J.-L.

(2012). An investigation of the influence of fixed-do and movable-do solfège systems on sight-singing pitch accuracy for various levels of diatonic and chromatic complexity (Doctoral dissertation). University of San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from https://repository.usfca.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com.br/&httpsredir=1&article=1037&context=diss

18.

Krumhansl

C. L.

(1979). The psychological representation of musical pitch in a tonal context. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 346–374.

19.

Krumhansl

C. L.

(1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

20.

Leman

Maes

P. J.

(2014). Music perception and embodied music cognition. In Shapiro

(Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 81–89). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

21.

B. E.

(1985). Sight singing and ear training at the university level: A case for the use of Kodály’s system of relative solmization. The Choral Journal, 25(7), 9–22.

22.

Russo

F. A.

Thompson

W. F.

(2005). An interval size illusion: The influence of timbre on the perceived size of melodic intervals. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 559–568.

23.

Schmuckler

M. A.

(1999). Testing models of melodic contour similarity. Music Perception, 16, 295–326.

24.

Smith

J. D.

Nelson

D. G. K.

Grohskopf

L. A.

Appleton

(1994). What child is this? What interval was that? Familiar tunes and music perception in novice listeners. Cognition, 52, 23–54.

25.

Tavakol

Dennick

(2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

26.

Thompson

W. F.

Russo

F. A.

Livingstone

S. R.

(2010). Facial expressions of singers influence perceived pitch relations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 317–322.

27.

Trainor

L. J.

McDonald

K. L.

Alain

(2002). Automatic and controlled processing of melodic contour and interval information measured by electrical brain activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 430–442.

28.

Welker

R. L.

(1982). Abstraction of themes from melodic variations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 435–447.

29.

Zarate

J. M.

(2013). The neural control of singing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 237.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.44 MB

Differences between scale steps and absolute interval sizes: A new test for intervallic awareness

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material