Developing musicians typically engage in self-regulated practicing during the time that passes between lessons with their teachers. An important aspect of self-regulated practice is the ability to identify and correct areas of development in performance in the absence of a teacher’s feedback, but the effort required to perform as well as monitor a performance represents a challenge for any learner. Videotaping the performance and watching it afterwards to fully concentrate on each task could constitute a solution to this problem. In our study, we verified how video feedback could affect the self-evaluation of intermediate-advanced musicians while practicing a new piece of music. To attain this objective, we analyzed and coded the self-evaluative comments of 16 classical guitarists while practicing. We then compared the number of coding entries in each category of a group of participants who used video feedback (n = 8) on four occasions over a period of ten practice sessions with those of a group of musicians who did not use video feedback (n = 8). Our results indicate that musicians who used video feedback modified the way they formulated their self-evaluative comments while practicing, and that these changes were more marked with higher-performing musicians.
AraújoM. V. (2016). Measuring self-regulated practice behaviours in highly skilled musicians. Psychology of Music, 44, 278–292.
2.
BartolomeS. J. (2009). Naturally emerging self-regulated practice behaviours among highly successful beginning recorder students. Research Studies in Music Education, 31, 37–51.
3.
Bonneville-RoussyA.BouffardT. (2015). When quantity is not enough: Disentangling the roles of practice time, self-regulation and deliberate practice in musical achievement. Psychology of Music, 43, 686–704.
4.
BoucherM.DubéF.CreechA. (2017). The effect of video feedback on the self-assessment of a music performance by pre-university level classical guitar students. In HughesG. (Ed.), Ipsative assessment and personal learning gain (pp. 197–219). London, England: Springer.
5.
ButlerD. L.WinneP. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.
6.
ClearyT. J.ZimmermanB. J. (2001). Self-regulation differences during athletic practice by experts, non-experts, and novices. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 185–206.
7.
CremaschiA. M. (2012). The effect of a practice checklist on practice strategies, practice self-regulation and achievement of collegiate music majors enrolled in a beginning class piano course. Research Studies in Music Education, 34, 223–233.
8.
CummingG. (2008). Replication and p intervals: p values predict the future only vaguely, but confidence intervals do much better. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 286–300.
9.
CummingG. (2009). Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals. Statistics in medicine, 28, 205–220.
10.
CummingG. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
CummingG. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29.
12.
CummingG.FidlerF. (2005). Interval estimates for statistical communication: problems and possible solutions. Paper presented at the IASE Satellite Conference on Statistics Education and the Communication of Statistics, Sydney, Australia. Abstract retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/14/cumming.pdf
13.
DanielR. (2001). Self-assessment in performance. British Journal of Music Education, 18, 215–226.
14.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L.CashC. D. (2009). It’s not how much; it’s how: Characteristics of practice behavior and retention of performance skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 310–321.
15.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RömerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review100, 363-406.
16.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
GreeneJ. A.RobertsonJ.CostaL. J. C. (2011). Assessing self-regulated learning using think-aloud methods. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 313–328). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
18.
GuadagnoliM.HolcombW.DavisM. (2002). The efficacy of video feedback for learning the golf swing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 615–622.
19.
HallamS. (2001b). The development of metacognition in musicians: Implications for education. British Journal of Music Education, 18, 27–39. doi: 10.1017/S0265051701000122
20.
HallamS. (2013). What predicts level of expertise attained, quality of performance, and future musical aspirations in young instrumental players?Psychology of Music, 41, 267–291.
21.
HallamS.RintaT.VarvarigouM.CreechA.PapageorgiI.GomesT.LanipekunJ. (2012). The development of practising strategies in young people. Psychology of Music, 40, 652–680.
22.
HebertE.LandinD.MenickelliJ. (1998). Videotape feedback: What learners see and how they use it. Journal of Sport Pedagogy, 4, 12–28.
23.
HughesG. (2011). Towards a personal best: A case for introducing ipsative assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 353–367.
24.
JørgensenH. (2004). Strategies for individual practice. In WilliamonA. (Ed.), Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance (pp. 85–103). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
KlineR. B. (2008). Becoming a behavioral science researcher: A guide to producing research that matters. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
KlineR. B. (2013). Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). Washington, DC: APA Books.
27.
KuoY.-C.WalkerA. E.SchroderK. E.BellandB. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50.
28.
MasakiM.HechlerP.GadboisS.WaddellG. (2011). Piano performance assessment: Video feedback and the Quality Assessment in Music Performance Inventory (QAMPI). In WilliamonA.EdwardsD.BartelL. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Performance Science 2011 (pp. 503–508). Utrecht, Netherlands: European Association of Conservatoires (AEC).
29.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ. M. (2001). A longitudinal study of self-regulation in children’s musical practice. Music Education Research, 3, 169–186.
30.
McPhersonG. E.RenwickJ .M. (2011). Self-regulation and mastery of musical skills. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 234–248). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
McPhersonG. E.ZimmermanB. J. (2002). Self-regulation of musical learning: A social cognitive perspective. In ColwellR.RichardsonC. (Eds.), The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning: A project of the Music Educators National Conference (pp. 327–347). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
MegaC.RonconiL.De BeniR. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 121.
33.
MiederK.BugosJ. A. (2017). Enhancing self-regulated practice behaviour in high school instrumentalists. International Journal of Music Education, 35, 578–587.
34.
MikszaP. (2011). A review of research on practicing: Summary and synthesis of the extant research with implications for a new theoretical orientation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 190, 51–92.
35.
MikszaP. (2015). The effect of self-regulation instruction on the performance achievement, musical self-efficacy, and practicing of advanced wind players. Psychology of Music, 43, 219–243.
36.
MikszaP.PrichardS.SorboD. (2012). An observational study of intermediate band students’ self-regulated practice behaviours. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60, 254–266.
37.
MornellA.OsborneM. S.McPhersonG. E. (2018). Evaluating practice strategies, behaviour and learning progress in elite performers: An exploratory study. Musicae Scientiae, 0, 1–6.
38.
NielsenS. G. (1999). Learning strategies in instrumental music practice. British Journal of Music Education, 16, 275–291.
39.
NielsenS. G. (2001). Self-regulating learning strategies in instrumental music practice. Music Education Research, 3, 155–167.
40.
NielsenS. G. (2015). Learning pre-played solos: Self-regulated learning strategies in jazz/improvised music. Research Studies in Music Education, 37, 233–246.
41.
PikeP. (2017). Self-regulation of teenaged pianists during at-home practice. Psychology of Music, 45, 1–13.
42.
RikliR.SmithG. (1980). Videotape feedback effects on tennis serving form. Perceptual and Motor skills, 50, 895–901.
43.
SelderD. J.Del RolanN. (1979). Knowledge of performance, skill level and performance on the balance beam. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 4, 226–229.
44.
VarelaW.AbramiP. C.UpitisR. (2016). Self-regulation and music learning: A systematic review. Psychology of Music, 44, 55–74.
45.
WinneP. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173–187.
46.
ZimmermanB. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30, 217–221.
47.
ZimmermanB. J. (1998a). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73–86.
48.
ZimmermanB. J. (1998b). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
49.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
50.
ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: an introduction and an overview. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (2012). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
