Recognition of popular songs from one’s past shows a phenomenon that is known as a “reminiscence bump” from autobiographical memory research, namely, the increased recognition performance of songs from one’s youth and early adulthood. As a first goal of the present study, a non-linear functional relation between popular song recognition performance and song-specific age of an individual was examined. As a second goal, individual differences in recognition performance curves were taken into account by including random effects. The third goal was to explain individual differences by including predictor variables. The sample comprised 90 participants aged 70 to 75 years. Participants listened to excerpts of 51 songs of the German charts from the years 1945 to 1995. Results show that the average bump performance was 75%, that the bump was located at about 17 years of age, and that the inflection point was located at 31 years. Individual differences could be explained by the number of correctly recognized songs, musical taste during one’s youth, and the frequency and preference of listing to bump songs. To conclude, an individual differences approach based on a non-linear function relation has been found to be a promising way to understand why popular songs from one’s youth are remembered better.
BartlettJ. C.SnelusP. (1980). Lifespan memory for popular songs. American Journal of Psychology, 93, 551–560.
2.
Bonneville-RoussyA.RentfrowP. J.XuK. M.PotterJ. (2013). Music through the ages: Trends in musical attitudes and preferences from adolescence through middle adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 703–717.
3.
BorsboomD. (2006). The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71, 425–440.
4.
CavagnaroD. R.MyungJ. I.PittM. A. (2013). Mathematical modeling. In LittleT. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of quantitative methods, Vol. 1 (pp. 438–553.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
ConwayM. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594–628.
6.
DavidianM.GiltinanD. M. (1995). Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data. New York: Chapman & Hall.
7.
EriksonE. H. (1950). Childhood and society (1st ed.). New York: Norton.
8.
HargreavesD. J.NorthA. C.TarrantM. (2006). Musical preference and taste in childhood and adolescence. In McPhersonG. E. (Ed.), The child as musician (pp. 135–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
HébertS.PeretzI. (1997). Recognition of music in long-term memory: Are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners?Memory and Cognition, 25, 518–533.
10.
HedekerD.GibbonsR. D. (2006). Longitudinal data analysis. New York: Wiley.
11.
HolbrookM. B.SchindlerR. M. (1989). Some exploratory findings on the development of musical tastes. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 119–124.
12.
JanssenS. M. J.ChessaA. G.MurreJ. M. J. (2007). Temporal distribution of favourite books, movies, and records: Differential encoding and re-sampling. Memory, 15, 755–767.
13.
JanssenS. M. J.MurreJ. M. J.MeeterM. (2008). Reminiscence bump in memory for public events. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 738–764.
14.
KurtzT.ZimprichD. (2013). Individual differences in criterion-based dropout learning in old age – The role of processing speed and verbal knowledge. European Journal of Ageing, 11, 183–193.
15.
LarsenS. F. (1996). Memorable books: Recall of reading and its personal context. In KreuzR.MacNealyM. S. (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 585–599). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16.
LarsonR. (1995). Secrets in the bedroom: Adolescents’ private use of media. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 535–550.
17.
LonsdaleA. J.NorthA. C. (2011). Why do we listen to music? A uses and gratifications analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 108–134.
18.
LuceR. D. (1995). Four tensions concerning mathematical modeling in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 1–26.
MolenberghsG.VerbekeG. (2005). Models for discrete longitudinal data. New York: Springer.
21.
NelderJ. A. (1966). Inverse polynomials, a useful group of multi-factor response functions. Biometrics, 22, 128–141.
22.
NeisserU. (1978). Memory: What are the important questions? In GrunebergM. M.MorrisP. E.SykesR. N. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 3–24). London: Academic Press.
23.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (1999). Music and adolescent identity. Music Education Research, 1, 75–92.
24.
PlatzF.KopiezR.HasselhornJ.WolfA. (2015). The impact of song-specific age and affective qualities of popular songs on music-evoked autobiographical memories (MEAMs). Musicae Scientiae, 19, 327–349.
25.
RathboneC. J.MoulinC. J. A.ConwayM. A. (2008). Self-centred memories: The reminiscence bump and the self. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1403–1414.
26.
RawlingsD.CiancarelliV. (1997). Music preference and the five-factor model of the NEO personality inventory. Psychology of Music, 25, 120–132.
27.
RentfrowP. J. (2012). The role of music in everyday life: Current directions in the social psychology of music. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 402–416.
28.
RubinD. C. (1977). Very long-term memory for prose and verse. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 611–621.
29.
RubinD. C.RahhalT. A.PoonL. W. (1998). Things learned in early adulthood are remembered best. Memory & Cognition, 26, 3–19.
30.
RubinD. C.SchulkindM. D. (1997). The distribution of autobiographical memories across the lifespan. Memory & Cognition, 25, 859–866.
31.
SAS Institute Inc. (2008). SAS/STAT 9.2 user’s guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
32.
SchellenbergE. G.HabashiP. (2015). Remembering the melody and timbre, forgetting the key and tempo. Memory & Cognition, 43, 1021–1031.
33.
SchindlerR. M.HolbrookM. B. (2003). Nostalgia for early experience as a determinant of consumer preferences. Psychology & Marketing, 20, 275–302.
34.
SchulkindM. D.HennisL. K.RubinD. C. (1999). Music, emotion, and autobiographical memory: They’re playing your song. Memory & Cognition, 27, 948–955.
35.
SchwartzK. D.FoutsG. T. (2003). Music preferences, personality style, and developmental issues of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32 (3), 205–213.
36.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (1994). Modeled variance in two-level models. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 342–363.
37.
UnderwoodB. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30, 128–134.
38.
WolfT.ZimprichD. (2015). How can individual differences in autobiographical memory distributions of older adults be explained?Memory, 24(9), 1287–1299. doi:10.1080/09658211.2015.1102291
39.
ZimprichD. (2002). Cross-sectionally and longitudinally balanced effects of processing speed on intellectual abilities. Experimental Aging Research, 28, 231–251.
40.
ZimprichD. (2010). Modeling change in skewed variables using mixed beta regression models. Research in Human Development, 7, 9–26.
41.
ZimprichD.AllemandM.LachmanM. E. (2012). Factorial structure and age-related psychometrics of the MIDUS personality adjective items across the lifespan. Psychological Assessment, 24, 173–186.
42.
ZimprichD.KurtzT. (2013). Individual differences and predictors of forgetting in old age: The role of processing speed and working memory. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 20, 195–219.
43.
ZimprichD.MartinM.KliegelM.DellenbachM.RastP.ZeintlM. (2008). Cognitive abilities in old age: Results from the Zurich Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67, 177–195.
44.
ZimprichD.RastP. (2009). Verbal learning changes in older adults across 18 months. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 16, 461–484.
45.
ZimprichD.RastP.MartinM. (2008). Individual differences in verbal learning in old age. In HoferS. M.AlwinD. F. (Eds.), The handbook of cognitive aging: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 224–243). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
46.
ZimprichD.WolfT. (2016a). The distribution of memories for popular songs in old age: An individual differences approach. Psychology of Music, 44, 640–657.
47.
ZimprichD.WolfT. (2016b). Modeling individual differences in autobiographical memory distributions using mixed logitnormal regression. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 360–374.
