Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-5
Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI): Portuguese version and associations with socio-demographic factors,personality and music preferences
The Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI) was recently proposed as a self-report measure of musical skills and behaviors in the general population. Although it is becoming a widely used tool, relatively little is known about its correlates, and adaptations into different languages will be crucial for cross-cultural comparisons and to allow for use beyond the original validation context. In this study, we adapted the Gold-MSI for use with Portuguese speaking individuals and evaluated it with a Portuguese sample (N = 408; age range = 17–66 years; 306 women). We demonstrate that the Portuguese version of the Gold-MSI has appropriate psychometric properties, including good internal consistency and very good test–retest reliability. This was observed for the five subscales and for the general musical sophistication index (α values ⩾ 0.82, r values ⩾ 0.84). Using confirmatory factor analysis, the expected underlying factor structure was also confirmed. In addition, we identified associations between individual differences on the Gold-MSI and socio-demographic factors (age, sex, education, socio-economic status), personality traits, and music preferences. The Portuguese Gold-MSI is freely available, and it offers a reliable and valid tool that can contribute to the refined assessment of musical sophistication in a range of research contexts.
BauerA.JaegerM.ThorneJ.BendixenA.DebenerS. (2015). The auditory dynamic attending theory revisited: A closer look at the pitch comparison task. Brain Research, 1626, 198–210.
2.
BigandE.Poulin-CharronnatB. (2006). Are we “experienced listeners”? A review of the musical capacities that do not depend on formal musical training. Cognition, 100(1), 100–130.
3.
BleichnerM.MirkovicB.DebenerS. (2016). Identifying auditory attention with ear-EEG: cEEGrid versus high-density cap-EEG comparison. Journal of Neural Engineering, 13(6), 066004.
4.
Brito-CostaS.Bem-HajaP.MoisãoA.AlbertyA.CastroF. V.De AlmeidaH. (2015). Psychometric properties of Portuguese version of Big Five Inventory (BFI). International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology [INFAD Revista de Psicología], 1(2), 83–94.
5.
ChurchillG. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.
CoffeyE.MogileverN.ZatorreR. (2017). Speech-in-noise perception in musicians: A review. Hearing Research, 352, 49–69.
8.
ColeD. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 584–594.
9.
CronbachL. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
10.
CurranP.WestS.FinchJ. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.
11.
FieldA. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.
12.
GetzL.MarksS.RoyM. (2014). The influence of stress, optimism, and music training on music uses and preferences. Psychology of Music, 42(1), 71–85.
13.
GreenbergD.MüllensiefenD.LambM.RentfrowP. (2015). Personality predicts musical sophistication. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 154–158.
14.
GuttmanL. (1945). A basis for analyzing test–retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10(4), 255–282.
15.
HadleyL.SturtP.EerolaT.PickeringM. (2018). Incremental comprehension of pitch relationships in written music: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 211–219.
16.
HambletonR. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In HambletonR. K.MerendaP.SpielbergerC. D. (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
HansenN.VuustP.PearceM. (2016). “If you have to ask, you’ll never know”: Effects of specialized stylistic expertise on predictive processing of music. PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0163584.
18.
HargreavesD.ComberC.ColleyA. (1995). Effects of age, gender, and training on musical preferences of British secondary school students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43(3), 242–250.
19.
HerholzS.ZatorreR. (2012). Musical training as a framework for brain plasticity: Behavior, function, and structure. Neuron, 76(3), 486–502.
20.
HuL.BentlerP. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
21.
JakubowskiK.FarrugiaN.StewartL. (2016). Probing imagined tempo for music: Effects of motor engagement and musical experience. Psychology of Music, 44(6), 1274–1288.
22.
JakubowskiK.HalpernA.GriersonM.StewartL. (2015). The effect of exercise-induced arousal on chosen tempi for familiar melodies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 559–565.
23.
JaroszA.WileyJ. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 2–9.
JeffreysH. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
LimaC.CastroS. (2011). Speaking to the trained ear: Musical expertise enhances the recognition of emotions in speech prosody. Emotion, 11(5), 1021–1031.
28.
McCraeR.CostaP. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.
29.
McManusI.FurnhamA. (2006). Aesthetic activities and aesthetic attitudes: Influences of education, background and personality on interest and involvement in the arts. British Journal of Psychology, 97(4), 555–587.
30.
MorenoS.BidelmanG. (2014). Examining neural plasticity and cognitive benefit through the unique lens of musical training. Hearing Research, 308, 84–97.
31.
MüllensiefenD.GingrasB.MusilJ.StewartL. (2014). The musicality of non-musicians: An index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e89642.
32.
RentfrowP.GoslingS. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1236–1256.
33.
RevelleW.ZinbargR. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154.
34.
RoseD.HarrisonE. (2007). The European socio-economic classification: A new social class schema for comparative European research. European Societies, 9(3), 459–490.
35.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
36.
SchaalN.BanissyM.LangeK. (2015). The rhythm span task: Comparing memory capacity for musical rhythms in musicians and non-musicians. Journal of New Music Research, 44(1), 3–10.
37.
SchaalN.BauerA.MüllensiefenD. (2014). The Gold-MSI: Replication and validation of a questionnaire instrument to measure musical experience based on a German sample [Der Gold-MSI: Replikation und validierung eines fragebogeninstrumentes zur messung musikalischer erfahrenheit anhand einer deutschen stichprobe]. Musicae Scientiae, 18(4), 423–447.
38.
SchaalN.KrauseV.LangeK.BanissyM.WilliamsonV.PollokB. (2015). Pitch memory in nonmusicians and musicians: Revealing functional differences using transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. Cerebral Cortex, 25(9), 2774–2782.
39.
SteigerJ. H. (1989). EzPATH: Causal modeling. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT.
40.
TaruffiL.AllenR.DowningJ.HeatonP. (2017). Individual differences in music-perceived emotions: The influence of externally oriented thinking. Music Perception, 34(3), 253–266.
41.
VuoskoskiJ.EerolaT. (2011). Measuring music-induced emotion: A comparison of emotion models, personality biases, and intensity of experiences. Musicae Scientiae, 15(2), 159–173.
42.
WagenmakersE.LoveJ.MarsmanM.JamilT.LyA.VerhagenJ.… MoreyR. D. (2017). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58–76.
43.
WagenmakersE.VerhagenJ.LyA. (2016). How to quantify the evidence for the absence of a correlation. Behavior Research Methods, 48(2), 413–426.
44.
ZinbargR.RevelleW.YovelI.LiW. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωH: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133.
45.
ZweigenhaftR. L. (2008). A do re mi encore: A closer look at the personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Individual Differences, 29(1), 45–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
