This research aimed to identify, describe and categorize cognitive strategies related to sight-singing within aural skills education. Using a constant comparative method, we carried out a thematic content analysis using NVivo to categorize strategies in a broad range of sources, including six interviews, five scientific publications, two professional books, and two ear-training manuals. Findings revealed 72 cognitive strategies grouped into four main categories and 14 subcategories: reading mechanisms (pitch decoding, pattern building, validation), sight-singing (preparation, performance), reading skills acquisition (musical vocabulary enrichment, symbolic associations, internalization, rehearsal techniques) and learning support (self-regulation, attention, time management, motivation, stress). Our cognitive strategy inventory provides a new framework for the study of cognitive strategies in aural skills research, and offers new insights for teachers who implement explicit cognitive strategies within their sight-singing pedagogy.
AsmusE. P. (2004). Music teaching and music literacy. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 13(6), 6–8.
2.
BarnesJ. W. (1960). An experimental study of interval drill as it affects sight singing skill (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
3.
BartholomewD. (1995). Sounds before symbols: What does phenomenology have to say?Philosophy of Music Education Review, 3(1), 3–9.
4.
BeanK. L. (1938). An experimental approach to the reading of music. Psychological Monographs, 50(6), i–80.
5.
BéginC. (2008). Les stratégies d’apprentissage: un cadre de référence simplifié. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 34(1), 47–67.
6.
BerkowitzS.FrontierG.KraftL.GoldsteinP.SmaldoneE. (2011). A new approach to sight singing (5th ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
7.
BoutinG. (2001). L’entretien de recherche qualitatif. Québec City, Canada: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
8.
BrownK. D. (2001). Effects of fixed and movable sightsinging systems on undergraduate music students’ ability to perform diatonic, modulatory, chromatic, and atonal melodic passages (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
9.
BowyerJ. (2015). More than solfège and hand signs: Philosophy, tools, and lesson planning in the authentic Kodály classroom. Music Educators Journal, 102(2), 69–76.
10.
BoyleJ. D. (1970). The effect of prescribed rhythmical movements on the ability to read music at sight. Journal of Research in Music Education, 18(4), 307–318.
11.
ChadwickJ. E. (1933). Predicting success in sight-singing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 17, 671–674.
12.
ChiuC. W. T. (1998, April). Synthesizing metacognitive interventions: What training characteristics can improve reading performance?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
13.
DannhäuserA. (1891). Solfège des solfèges (CornellJ. H. Trans.). Milwaukee, WI: Schirmer.
14.
DansereauD. F. (1985). Learning strategy research. In SegalJ. W.ChipmanS. F.GlaserR. (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
DavidsonL.ScrippL.WelshP. (1988). “Happy birthday”: Evidence for conflicts of perceptual knowledge and conceptual understanding. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22(1), 65–74.
16.
DeanC. D. (1937). Predicting sight-singing ability in teacher-education. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 28(8), 601–608.
17.
DeBellisM. (2005). Conceptual and non-conceptual modes of music perception. Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics, 2(2), 45–61.
18.
DignathC.BüttnerG. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition Learning, 3, 231–264.
19.
DignathC.BüttnerG.LangfeldtH. (2008). How can primary school students learn self- regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129.
20.
DonkerA. S.de BoerH.KostonsD.Dignath van EwijkC. C.van der WerfM. P. C. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1–26.
21.
DrakeC.PalmerC. (2000). Skill acquisition in music performance: Relations between planning and temporal control. Cognition, 74(1), 1–32.
22.
ElliottC. A. (1982). The identification and classification of instrumental performance sight-reading errors. Journal of Band Research, 18(1), 36–42.
23.
FloydE.BradleyK. D. (2006). Teaching strategies related to successful sight-singing in Kentucky choral ensembles. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 25, 70–81.
24.
FournierG. (2015). Recension, description et catégorisation des stratégies cognitives liées à la lecture à vue chantée et à l’apprentissage du solfège chez les étudiants en musique de niveau collégial (Master’s thesis, Université Laval). Retrieved from http://www.theses.ulaval.ca/2015/32058/
25.
FurbyV. (2008). Process and products: The sight-singing backgrounds and behaviors of first-year undergraduate students (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
26.
GrutzmacherP. A. (1987). The effect of tonal pattern training on the aural perception, reading recognition, and melodic sight-reading achievement of first-year instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35(5), 171–181.
27.
HarrisonC. (1987). The validity of the musical aptitude profile for predicting grades in freshman music theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 477–482.
28.
HarrisonC. (1990). Relationships between grades in the components of freshman music theory and selected background variables. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38(3), 175–186.
29.
HarrisonC. (1991). Analyses of relationships between aural skills and background variables: LISREL versus multiple regression. The Quarterly, 2(4), 10–20.
30.
HarrisonC.AsmusE.SerpeR. (1994). Effects of musical aptitude, academic ability, music experience, and motivation on aural skills. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42(2), 131–144.
31.
HattieJ.BiggsJ.PurdieN. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.
32.
HenryM. L. (2004). The use of targeted pitch skills for sight-singing instruction in the choral rehearsal. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52(3), 206–217.
33.
HenryM. L. (2008). The use of specific practice and performance strategies in sight-singing instruction. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 26(2), 11–16.
34.
HolmesA. V. (2009). Effect of fixed-do and movable-do solfege instruction on the development of sightsinging skill in seven-and eight-year-old children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
35.
HungJ.-L. (2012). An investigation of the influence of fixed-do and movable-do solfège systems on sight-singing pitch accuracy for various levels of diatonic and chromatic complexity (Doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
36.
KarpinskiG. S. (2000). Aural skills acquisition: The development of listening, reading, and performing skills in college-level musicians. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
KarpinskiG. S. (2007). Manual for ear training and sight singing. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.
38.
KillianJ. N.HenryM. L. (2005). A comparison of successful and unsuccessful strategies in individual sight-singing preparation and performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(1), 51–65.
39.
KopiezR.LeeJ. (2006). Towards a dynamic model of skills involved in sight reading music. Music Education Research, 8(1), 97–120.
40.
KopiezR.LeeJ. (2008). Towards a general model of skills involved in sight reading music. Music Education Research, 10(1), 41–62.
41.
LehmannA.McArthurV. (2002). Sight-reading. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 135–150). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Leon-GuerreroA. (2008). Self-regulation strategies used by student musicians during music practice. Music Education Research, 10(1), 91–106.
44.
MacKenzieC. L.VaneerdD. L.GrahamE. D.HuronD. B.WillsB. L. (1986). The effect of tonal structure on rhythm in piano performance. Music Perception, 4(2), 215–225.
45.
MacKnightC. B. (1975). Music reading ability of beginning wind instrumentalists after melodic instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23(1), 23–34.
46.
McPhersonG. E. (1994). Factors and abilities influencing sightreading skill in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42(3), 217–231.
47.
MishraJ. (2013). Improving sightreading accuracy: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Music, 42(2), 131–156.
48.
MishraJ. (2014). Factors related to sight-reading accuracy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(4), 452–465.
49.
NielsenS. G. (1999). Learning strategies in instrumental music practice. British Journal of Music Education, 16(3), 275–291.
50.
NielsenS. G. (2001). Self-regulating learning strategies in instrumental music practice. Music Education Research, 3(2), 155–167.
51.
OttmanR. W. (1956). A statistical investigation of the influence of selected factors on the skill of sight-singing (Doctoral dissertation, North Texas State College). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
52.
OxfordR. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
53.
PailléP.MucchielliA. (2013). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales (3rd ed.). Paris, France: Armand Collin.
54.
PalmerC.KrumhanslC. L. (1990). Mental representations for musical meter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 728–741.
55.
ParkerR. C. (1979). The relative effectiveness of the Tap System in instruction in sight singing: An experimental study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Miami). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
RodeheaverR. E. (1972). An investigation of the vocal sight reading ability of college freshman music majors (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
58.
RogersM. (2004). Teaching approaches in music theory: An overview of pedagogical philosophies. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
59.
SalisD. L. (1980). Laterality effects with visual perception of musical chords and dot patterns. Perception and Psychophysics, 28(4), 284–292.
60.
SauvayreR. (2013). Les méthodes de l’entretien en sciences sociales. Paris, France: Dunod.
61.
SchleuterS. (1983). A predictive study of an experimental college version of the musical aptitude profile with certain music achievement of college music majors. Psychology of Music, 11, 32–36.
62.
ScrippL. R. (1995). The development of skill in reading music (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, MA). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
63.
ScrippL. R.DavidsonL. (1994). Giftedness and professional training: The impact of music reading skills on musical development of conservatory students. In SubotnikR.ArnoldD. D. (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 186–211). New York, NY: Ablex.
64.
SeashoreC. (1938). The psychology of music. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
65.
SlobodaJ. A. (1978). The psychology of music reading. Psychology of Music, 6(2), 3–20.
66.
SlobodaJ. A. (1983). The communication of musical metre in piano performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(2), 377–396.
67.
SousaD. A. (2009). Un cerveau pour apprendre à lire: mieux comprendre le fonctionnement du cerveau pour enseigner la lecture plus efficacement (SiroisG. Trans.). Montréal, Canada: Chenelière Éducation.
68.
StegallJ. C. (1992). The influence of isolated rhythmic training with a selected method of study on the ability to sing music at sight (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
69.
StevensonA. R. (2010). The effect of specific strategies on the sight-singing performance of high school singers (Master’s thesis, Western Illinois University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
70.
ThackrayR. (1975). Some thoughts on aural training. Australian Journal of Music Education, 17, 25–30.
71.
ThompsonK. A. (2003). Pitch internalization strategies of professional musicians (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
72.
ThompsonK. A. (2004). Thinking in sound: A qualitative study of metaphors for pitch perception. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 18, 81–107.
73.
ThornbergR. (2012). Grounded theory. In ArthurJ.WaringM.CoeR.HedgesL. V., Research methods & methodologies in education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
ThostensonM. S. (1967). The study and evaluation of certain problems in eartraining related to achievement in sightsinging and music dictation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 11, 14–35.
75.
TremblayV. (2014). L’enseignement de la formation auditive: approches et démarches pédagogiques des enseignants des cégeps francophones du Québec (Master’s thesis, Université Laval, Canada). Retrieved from http://www.theses.ulaval.ca/2014/30588/
76.
VujovićI.BogunovićB. (2012, July). Cognitives strategies in sight-singing. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC) and 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, Thessaloniki, Greece.
77.
WatersA. J.TownsendE.UnderwoodG. (1998). Expertise in musical sight reading: A study of pianists. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 123–149.
78.
WeinsteinC. F.MayerR. F. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York, NY: Macmillan.
79.
WolfT. (1976). A cognitive model of musical sight-reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5(2), 143–171.
