Musicians can conceptualize harmony in terms of its connection to specific pieces of music. However, research appears to indicate that harmony plays a relatively unimportant role in music identification tasks. The present study examines the ability of listeners of varying levels of musical expertise to identify music from chord progressions. Participants were asked to identify well-known classical and pop/rock pieces from their chord progressions, which were recorded using either piano tones or Shepard tones and were played at six transpositional levels. Although musical training and invariance of surface melodic and rhythmic features were found to have an advantageous effect on the identification task, even some non-musicians were able to identify music from chord progressions in conditions of low invariance of surface features. Implications of these results for our understanding of how listeners mentally represent and remember harmony are discussed.
AndrewsM. W.DowlingW. J.BartlettJ. C.HalpernA. R. (1998). Identification of speeded and slowed familiar melodies by younger, middle-aged, and older musicians and nonmusicians. Psychology and Aging, 13, 462–471.
5.
Apple Inc. (2007). GarageBand 3.0.5 [computer software]. Cupertino, CA.
BartlettJ. C.DowlingW. J. (1980). Recognition of transposed melodies: A key-distance effect in developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 501–515.
8.
BergesonT. R.TrehubS. E. (2002). Absolute pitch and tempo in mothers’ songs to infants. Psychological Science, 13, 72–75.
9.
BerlinerP. F. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
BharuchaJ. J. (1984). Anchoring effects in music: The resolution of dissonance. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 485–518.
11.
BharuchaJ. J.StoeckigK. (1986). Reaction time and musical expectancy: Priming of chords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 403–410.
12.
BiamonteN. (2010). Triadic modal and pentatonic patterns in rock music. Music Theory Spectrum, 32(2), 95–110.
13.
BigandE.Poulin-CharronnatB. (2009). Tonal cognition. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (pp. 59–71). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
BlyB. M.CarriónR. E.RaschB. (2009). Domain-specific learning of grammatical structure in musical and phonological sequences. Memory & Cognition, 37(1), 10–20.
15.
CannamC.LandoneC.SandlerM. (2010). Sonic Visualiser: An open source application for viewing, analysing, and annotating music audio files. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Multimedia International Conference (pp. 1467–1468). New York, NY: ACM.
16.
CambouropoulosE. (2008). Voice and stream: Perceptual and computational modeling of voice separation. Music Perception, 26(1), 75–94.
17.
CaoE.LotsteinM.Johnson-LairdP. N. (2014). Similarity and families of musical rhythms. Music Perception, 31, 444–469.
18.
ChafeW. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
ClendinningJ. P.MarvinE. W. (2011). The musician’s guide to theory and analysis (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
20.
CuddyL. L.CohenA. J. (1976). Recognition of transposed melodic sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 255–270.
21.
CullimoreJ. R. (1999). Harmonic hierarchies as distinctive abstractions that listeners may derive from musical surface structure (Unpublished master’s thesis). Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada.
22.
CzernyC. (1849/1979). School of practical composition: Complete treatise on the composition of all kinds of music (J. Beshop, Trans.). New York: Da Capo Press. (Reprinted fromDie schule der praktischen tonsetzkunst, Bonn: Simrock.)
23.
deClercqT.TemperleyD. (2011). A corpus analysis of rock harmony. Popular Music, 30, 47–70.
DowlingW. J.BartlettJ. C.HalpernA. R.AndrewsM. W. (2008). Melody recognition at fast and slow tempos: Effects of age, experience, and familiarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 496–502.
26.
FarboodM. M. (2012). A parametric, temporal model of musical tension. Music Perception, 29, 387–428.
27.
FirminoÉ. A.BuenoJ. L. O.BigandE. (2009). Travelling through pitch space speeds up musical time. Music Perception, 26, 205–209.
28.
FrielerK.RiedemannF. (2011). Is independent creation likely to happen in pop music?Musicae Scientiae, 15, 17–28.
29.
FrielerK.FischingerT.SchlemmerK.LothwesenK.JakubowskiK.MüllensiefenD. (2013). Absolute memory for pitch: A comparative replication of Levitin’s 1994 study in six European labs. Musicae Scientiae, 17, 334–349.
30.
ForthJ. (2012). Cognitively-motivated geometric methods of pattern discovery and models of similarity in music (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Goldsmiths University, London, England.
31.
GoldstoneR. L. (1994). The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52(2), 125–157.
GußmackM. B.VitouchO.GulaB. (2006). Latent absolute pitch: An ordinary ability? In BaroniM.AddessiA. R.CaterinaR.CostaM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Perception & Cognition (pp. 1408–1412). Bologna, Italy: Bononia University Press.
34.
HahnK. (2002). Absolute memory for melody: A study with choir singers. In StevensC.BurnhamD.McPhersonG.SchubertE.RenwickJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 514–517). Sydney, Australia: Adelaide Causal Productions.
35.
HalpernA. R. (1984). Perception of structure in novel music. Memory & Cognition, 12, 163–170.
36.
HalpernA. R. (1989). Memory for the absolute pitch of familiar songs. Memory & Cognition, 17, 572–581.
37.
HalpernA. R.BartlettJ. C. (2010). Memory for melodies. In JonesM. R.FayR. R.PopperA. N. (Eds.), Music perception (pp. 233–258). New York: Springer.
38.
HébertS.PeretzI. (1997). Recognition of music in long-term memory: Are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners?Memory & Cognition, 25, 518–533.
39.
HuronD. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
JansmaJ. M.RamseyN. F.SlagterH. A.KahnR. S. (2001). Functional anatomical correlates of controlled and automatic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 730–743.
41.
JimenezI. E.RossiV. (2013). The influence of instrument, harmony, and voice leading on listeners’ distinction between popular and classical music. Unpublished manuscript.
42.
JonaitisE. M.SaffranJ. R. (2009). Learning harmony: The role of serial statistics. Cognitive Science, 33(5), 951–968.
43.
KosticB.ClearyA. M. (2009). Song recognition without identification: When people cannot “name that tune” but can recognize it as familiar. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 146–159.
44.
KostkaS. M.PayneD. (2008). Tonal harmony: With an introduction to twentieth-century music (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
45.
KrumhanslC. L. (2000). Rhythm and pitch in music cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 159–179.
46.
KrumhanslC. L. (2010). Plink: “Thin slices” of music. Music Perception, 27(5), 337–354.
47.
KrumhanslC. L.BharuchaJ. J.KesslerE. J. (1982). Perceived harmonic structure of chords in three related musical keys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 24–36.
48.
KuusiT. (2007). Interval-class and order of presentation affect interval discrimination. Journal of New Music Research, 36, 95–104.
49.
KuusiT. (2009). Tune recognition from melody, rhythm and harmony. In LouhivuoriJ.EerolaT.SaarikallioS.HimbergT.EerolaP-S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM 2009), Jyväskylä, Finland. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-2009411339
50.
KuusiT. (2015). Musical training and musical ability: Effects on chord discrimination. Psychology of Music, 43, 291–301.
51.
LevitinD. J. (1994). Absolute memory for musical pitch: Evidence from the production of learned melodies. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 414–423.
52.
LouiP.WuE. H.WesselD. L.KnightR. T. (2009). A generalized mechanism for perception of pitch patterns. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(2), 454–459.
53.
MaceliA. (2009). Cultivating the imaginative ear for jazz improvisation: A study in three settings (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, New York.
54.
MélenM.DeliègeI. (1995). Extraction of cues or underlying harmonic structure: Which guides recognition of familiar melodies?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 81–106.
MooreA. (1992). Patterns of harmony. Popular Music, 11(1), 73–106.
57.
MooreB. C. J.RosenS. M. (1979). Tune recognition with reduced pitch and interval information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 229–240.
ParryD. (2009). The 50 greatest pieces of classical music. London Philharmonic Orchestra. X5 Music Group. ASIN: B002WMP162.
60.
PeynírcíoğluZ. F.TekcanA. Í.WagnerJ. L.BaxterT. L.ShafferS. D. (1998). Name or hum that tune: Feeling of knowing for music. Memory & Cognition, 26(6), 1131–1137.
61.
PovelD. J.Van EgmondR. (1993). The function of accompanying chords in the recognition of melodic fragments. Music Perception, 11, 101–115.
62.
PrickettC. A. (2000). A comparison of the basic song repertoire of vocal/choral and instrumental music education majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 5–9.
63.
RabinovitzB. E.PeynírcíoğluZ. F. (2011). Feeling-of-knowing for songs and instrumental music. Acta Psychologica, 138(1), 74–84.
64.
ReevesS. D. (2001). Creative jazz improvisation. Prentice Hall.
65.
Roig-FrancolíM. A. (2011). Harmony in context (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
66.
RosenbergN. (2014). Bach, Beck, and Bjork walk into a bar: Reclassifying harmonic progressions to accommodate popular music repertoire. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 28, 163–209.
67.
SchellenbergE. G.HabashiP. (2015). Remembering the melody and timbre, forgetting the key and tempo. Memory & Cognition, 43(7), 1021–1031.
68.
SchellenbergE. G.IversonP.McKinnonM. (1999). Name that tune: Identifying popular recordings from brief excerpts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 641–646.
69.
SchellenbergE. G.StalinskiS. M.MarksB.M. (2014). Memory for surface features of unfamiliar melodies: Independent effects of changes in pitch and tempo. Psychological Research, 78, 84–95.
70.
SchellenbergE. G.TrehubS. E. (2003). Good pitch memory is widespread. Psychological Science, 14, 262–266.
71.
SchellenbergE. G.TrehubS. E. (2008). Is there an Asian advantage for pitch memory?Music Perception, 25, 241–252.
72.
ScottR. J. (2000). Money chords: A songwriter’s sourcebook of popular chord progressions. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.
SnyderB. (2009). Memory for music. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. H. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of music psychology (pp. 107–117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75.
StoiaN. (2013). The common stock of schemes in early blues and country music. Music Theory Spectrum, 35, 194–234. doi:10.1525/mts.2013.35.2.194
76.
TakeuchiA. H.HulseS. H. (1992). Key-distance effects in melody recognition reexamined. Music Perception, 10, 1–24.
77.
TerhardtE.SeewannM. (1983). Aural key identification and its relationship to absolute pitch. Music Perception, 1, 63–83.
78.
TerhardtE.WardW. D. (1982). Recognition of musical key: Exploratory study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 26–33.
ToussaintG. T. (2013). The geometry of musical rhythm: What makes a “good” rhythm good?Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
81.
TrehubS. E.SchellenbergE. G.NakataT. (2008). Crosscultural perspectives on pitch memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100, 40–52.
82.
van ZuijenT. L. (2006). Sensory auditory processing and intuitive sound detection. An investigation of musical experts and nonexperts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
83.
VanWeeldenK. (2012). Classical music as popular music: Adolescents’ recognition of Western art music. Applications of Research in Music Education, 31, 1–11.
84.
VanWeeldenK. (2014). Preservice music teachers’ recognition of Western art music found in popular culture. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 24, 65–75.
85.
VitouchO.GauguschA. (2000). Absolute recognition of musical keys in non-absolute-pitch-possessors. In WoodsC.LuckG. B.BrochardR.O’NeillS. A.SlobodaJ. A. (Eds), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Keele, Staffordshire, UK: Department of Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.escom.org/proceedings/ICMPC2000/Mon/Vitouch.htm
86.
VolkovaA.TrehubS. E.SchellenbergE. G.PapsinB. C.GordonK. A. (2014). Children’s identification of familiar songs from pitch and timing cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00863
87.
VongpaisalT.TrehubS. E.SchellenbergE. G. (2006). Song recognition by children and adolescents with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 1091–1103.
88.
WarrenR. M.GardnerD. A.BrubackerB. S.BashfordJ. A.Jr. (1991). Melodic and nonmelodic sequences of tones: Effects of duration on perception. Music Perception, 8, 277–290.
89.
WhiteB. W. (1960). Recognition of distorted melodies. American Journal of Psychology, 73, 100–107.
90.
WilliamsL. R. (2004). The effect of musical training and musical complexity on focus of attention to melody or harmony (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
91.
WolpertR. S. (2000). Attention to key in a non-directed music listening task: Musicians vs. nonmusicians. Music Perception, 18, 225–230.
