The purpose of the meta-analysis was to address the varied results within the area of singing ability research by statistically summarizing the data of related studies. Across 34 studies, analyses yielded an overall mean effect size for instruction of g = 0.43. Studies were limited to pretest-posttest or posttest-only quasi-experimental designs. The largest overall study effect size across categorical variables included the effects of same and different discrimination techniques on mean singing score gains. Overall mean effects by primary moderator variable ranged from trivial to moderate. Feedback yielded the largest effect regarding teaching condition, 8-year-old children yielded the largest effect regarding age, the Boardman assessment measure yielded the largest effect regarding measurement instrument, and song accuracy yielded the largest effect regarding measured task. Regarding gender, boys and girls improved similarly from singing interventions across studies. Implications for singing instruction pertain to the importance of intervention, especially between the ages of 5 and 8. Results from the meta-analysis have highlighted a tendency for singing interventions to improve singing ability more than traditional song-singing and more than no music instruction at all. Results from the meta-analysis have also highlighted the importance of self, teacher, and computer feedback in the development of singing.
*ApfelstadtH. (1984). Effects of melodic perception instruction on pitch discrimination and vocal accuracy of kindergarten children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 15–24. doi:10.2307/3345277
2.
*AtterburyB. W.SilcoxL. (1993). The effect of piano accompaniment on kindergartners’ developmental singing ability. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 40–47. doi:10/2307/3345378
3.
BentleyA. (1969). Monotones: Music education research papers. London, UK: Novello.
4.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
5.
CampbellD. T.StandleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6.
CardN. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
8.
EllisP. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
GaultB. (2002). Effects of pedagogical approach, presence/absence of text, and developmental music aptitude on the song performance accuracy of kindergarten and first-grade students. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 152, 54–63.
10.
GreenG. A. (1990). The effect of vocal modeling on pitch–matching accuracy of elementary schoolchildren. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 225–231. doi:10.2307/3345186
11.
GoetzeM.CooperN.BrownC. J. (1990). Recent research on singing in the general music classroom. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 104, 16–37.
12.
GoetzeM.HoriiY. (1989). A comparison of the pitch accuracy of group and individual singing in young children. Bulletin of the Council of Research in Music Education, 52, 23–30.
13.
GouldA. O. (1969). Developing specialized programs for singing in the elementary school. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 17, 9–22.
14.
*GuilbaultD. M. (2004). The effect of harmonic accompaniment on the tonal achievement and tonal improvisations of children in kindergarten and first grade. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 64–76. doi:10.2307/3345525
15.
HeddenD. (2012). An overview of existing research about children’s singing and the implications for teaching children to sing. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 30(2), 52–62. doi:10.1177/8755123312438516
16.
*HeddenD. G.BakerV. A. (2010). Perceptual and acoustical analyses of second graders’ pitch-matching ability in singing a cappella or with piano accompaniment. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 184, 35–48. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27861481
17.
HermansonL. W. (1971). An investigation of the effects of timbre on simultaneous vocal pitch acuity of young children (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 7204169)
18.
HornbachC.TaggartC. (2005). The relationship between developmental tonal aptitude and singing achievement among kindergarten, first-, second-, and third-grade students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 322–331. doi:10.1177/002242940505300404
19.
Huedo-MedinaT.Sanchez-MecaJ.Marin-MartinezF.BotellaJ. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?Psychological Methods, 11, 193–206. doi:10.1037/1082–989X.11.2.193
20.
*JarjisianC. S. (1981). The effects of pentatonic and/or diatonic pitch pattern instruction on the rote-singing achievement of young children (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 8125481)
21.
*Jordan-DeCarboJ. (1982). Same/different discrimination techniques, readiness training, pattern treatment, and sex on aural discrimination and singing of tonal patterns by kindergartners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 237–246. doi:10.2307/3345297
22.
*KlingerR.CampbellP. S.GoolsbyT. (1998). Approaches to children’s song acquisition: Immersion and phrase-by-phrase. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 24–34. doi:10.2307/3345757
23.
LiaoM. (2008). The effects of gesture use on young children’s pitch accuracy for singing tonal patterns. International Journal of Music Education, 26, 197–211.
24.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
*MiyamotoK. (2005). Effects of a remedial singing method on the vocal pitch accuracy of inaccurate elementary singers. Research & Issues in Music Education, 3(1), 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.stthomas.edu/rimeonline/vol3/miyamoto1.htm
26.
MooreR. (1994). Effects of age, sex, and melodic/harmonic patterns on vocal pitch-matching skills of talented 8–11-year-olds. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 5–13. doi:10.2307/3345332
27.
MooreR. S.ChenH. S.BrotonsM. (2004). Pitch and interval accuracy in echo singing and xylophone playing by 8 and 10 year-old children from England, Spain, Taiwan, and USA. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 161–162, 173–180.
28.
MooreR. S.FykJ.FregaA. L.BrotonsM. (1996). Influences of culture, age, gender and two-tone melodies on interval matching skills of children from Argentina, Poland, Spain and the USA. Bulletin of the Council of Research in Music Education, 127, 127–135.
29.
*PaneyA. S.KayA. C. (2014). Developing singing in third-grade music classrooms: The effect of a concurrent-feedback computer game on pitch-matching skills. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 34, 42–49. doi:10.1177/8755123314548047
30.
*PersellinD. C. (2006). The effects of vocal modeling, musical aptitude, and home environment on pitch accuracy of young children. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 169, 39–50.
31.
*PorterS. Y. (1977). The effect of multiple discrimination training on pitch-matching behaviors of uncertain singers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 68–82. doi:10.2307/3344846
32.
*RobertsE.DaviesA. (1975). Poor pitch singing: Response of monotone singers to a program of remedial training. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 227–239. doi:10.2307/3344852
33.
*RutkowskiJ. (1996). The effectiveness of individual/small-group singing activities on kindergartners’ use of singing voice and developmental music aptitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 353–368. doi:10.2307/3345447
34.
SalvadorK. (2010). How can elementary teachers measure singing voice achievement? A critical review of assessments, 1994–2009. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 29(1), 40–47.
35.
SimmsW. L.MooreR. S.KuhnR. L. (1982). Effects of female and male vocal stimuli, tonal pattern length and age on vocal pitch-matching abilities of young children from England and the United States. Psychology of Music, Special Issue: Proceedings of the IX International Seminar on Research in Music Education, 104–108.
36.
SmallA. R.McCachernF. L. (1983). The effect of male and female vocal modeling on pitch-matching accuracy of first-grade children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 227–233. doi:10.2307/3345175
37.
WelchG. F. (2015). Singing and vocal development. In McPhersonG. (Ed.), The child as musician: A handbook of musical development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
*WelchG. F.HowardD. M.RushC. (1989). Real-time visual feedback in the development of vocal pitch accuracy in singing. Psychology of Music, 17, 146–157. doi:10.1177/0305735689172005
39.
WelchG. F.SergeantD. C.WhiteP. (1997). Age, sex and vocal task as factors in singing “in-tune” during the first years of schooling. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 133, 153–160.
40.
YarbroughC.BowersJ.BensonW. (1992). The effect of vibrato on the pitch-matching accuracy of certain and uncertain singers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 30–38. doi:10.2307/3345773
41.
YarbroughC.GreenG.BensonW.BowersJ. (1991). Inaccurate singers: An exploratory study of variables affecting pitch-matching. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 107, 23–34.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
