This article discusses some general issues arising from the study of similarity in music, both human-conducted and computer-aided, and then progresses to a consideration of similarity relationships between patterns in a phrase by Beethoven, from the first movement of the Piano Sonata in A flat major op. 110 (1821), and various potential memetic precursors. This analysis is followed by a consideration of how the kinds of similarity identified in the Beethoven phrase might be understood in psychological/conceptual and then neurobiological terms, the latter by means of William Calvin’s Hexagonal Cloning Theory. This theory offers a mechanism for the operation of David Cope’s concept of the lexicon, conceived here as a museme allele-class. I conclude by attempting to correlate and map the various spaces within which memetic replication occurs.
BlackmoreS. J. (1999). The meme machine. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
BlackmoreS. J. (2000). The Memes’ Eye View. In AungerR. (Ed.), Darwinizing culture: The status of memetics as a science (pp. 25–42). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
BorgesJ. L. (1970). Labyrinths: Selected stories and other writings (YatesD. A.IrbyJ. E., Eds.). London, UK: Penguin.
4.
BurakY.FieteI. R. (2009). Accurate path integration in continuous attractor network models of grid cells. PLoS Computational Biology, 5(2), e1000291.
5.
ByrosV. (2009). Towards an ‘archaeology’ of hearing: Schemata and eighteenth-century consciousness. Musica Humana, 1–2, 235–306.
6.
CalvinW. H. (1996). The cerebral code: Thinking a thought in the mosaics of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
CalvinW. H. (1998). Competing for consciousness: A Darwinian mechanism at an appropriate level of explanation. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5(4), 389–404.
8.
CambouropoulosE. (1998). Towards a general computational theory of musical structure. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK.
9.
ConeE. T. (1987). On derivation: Syntax and rhetoric. Music Analysis, 6(3), 237–255.
10.
ConklinD.AnagnostopoulouC. (2006). Segmental pattern discovery in music. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 18, 285–293.
11.
CooperB. (1985). Newly identified sketches for Beethoven’s Tenth Symphony. Music and Letters, 66(1), 9–18.
12.
CopeD. (2003). Computer analysis of musical allusions. Computer Music Journal, 27(1), 11–28.
13.
DahlhausC. (1982). Esthetics of music (AustinW.W., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DawkinsR. (1983a). The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
DawkinsR. (1983b). Universal Darwinism. In BendallD. S. (Ed.), Evolution from molecules to men (pp. 403–425). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DawkinsR. (1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
DawkinsR. (1991). The blind watchmaker. London, UK: Penguin.
DennettD. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. London, UK: Penguin.
20.
DeutschD. (1999). Grouping mechanisms in music. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 299–348). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21.
FuhsM. C.TouretzkyD. S. (2006). A spin glass model of path integration in rat medial entorhinal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26(16), 4266–4276.
22.
GarliauskasA.ŠoliūnasA. (2000). Hexagonal approach and modeling for the visual cortex. Informatica, 11(4), 397–410.
23.
GjerdingenR. O. (1988). A classic turn of phrase: Music and the psychology of convention. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
24.
GjerdingenR. O. (2007). Music in the galant style. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
HawkettA. (2013). An empirical investigation into the concept of musical memes in western classical music using data mining techniques on MusicXML documents. PhD thesis, University of Huddersfield, UK.
26.
HuronD. (2002). Music information processing using the Humdrum Toolkit: Concepts, examples, and lessons. Computer Music Journal, 26(2), 11–26.
JanS. B. (2015). From holism to compositionality: Memes and the evolution of segmentation, syntax and signification in music and language. Language and Cognition7(1), 1–38.
33.
KellerH. (2001). Functional analysis: The unity of contrasting themes. Complete edition of the analytical scores (Publikationen des Instituts für Musikanalytik, Wien). (GruberG.W., Ed.). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
34.
KillianN. J.JutrasM. J.BuffaloE. A. (2012). A map of visual space in the primate entorhinal cortex. Nature, 491, 761–764. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11587
35.
KorsynK. (1991). Towards a new poetics of musical influence. Music Analysis, 10(1–2), 3–72.
36.
LartillotO. (2009). Taxonomic categorisation of motivic patterns. Musicae Scientiae Discussion Forum 4B: Musical Similarity, 25–46.
37.
LartillotO.ToiviainenP. (2007). Motivic matching strategies for automated pattern extraction. Musicae Scientiae Discussion Forum 4A: Similarity Perception in Listening to Music, 281–314.
38.
LemanM. (1995). Music and schema theory: Cognitive foundations of systematic musicology. Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
39.
LemanM. (2008). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.
40.
LengX.ShawG. L. (1991). Toward a neural theory of higher brain function using music as a window. Concepts in Neuroscience, 2, 229–258.
41.
LerdahlF.JackendoffR. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
MerkerB. (2002). Music: The missing Humboldt system. Musicae Scientiae, 6, 3–21.
43.
MeyerL. B. (1996). Style and music: Theory, history, and ideology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
MithenS. (2006). The singing neanderthals: The origins of music, language, mind and body. London, UK: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
47.
NarmourE. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realization model. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
NattiezJ.-J. (1990). Music and discourse: Toward a semiology of music (AbbateC., Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
O’KeefeJ.DostrovskyJ. (1971). The hippocampus as a spatial map: Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Research, 34(1), 171–175.
50.
OckelfordA. (2005). Relating musical structure and content to aesthetic response: A model and analysis of Beethoven’s Sonata Op. 110. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 130(1), 74–118.
51.
OckelfordA. (2013). Applied musicology: Using zygonic theory to inform music education, therapy, and psychology research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
PlotkinH. C. (2010). Evolutionary worlds without end. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53.
SchenkerH. (1979). Free composition (OsterE., Ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
54.
ShragerY.KirwanC. B.SquireL. R. (2008). Neural basis of the cognitive map: Path integration does not require hippocampus or entorhinal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(33), 12034–12038.
55.
SnyderB. (2000). Music and memory: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56.
StensolaH.StensolaT.SolstadT.FrølandK.MoserM.-B.MoserE. I. (2012). The entorhinal grid map is discretized. Nature, 492, 72–78.
57.
StreetA. (1989). Superior myths, dogmatic allegories: The resistance to musical unity. Music Analysis, 8, 77–123.
58.
WallinN. L.MerkerB.BrownS. (2000). The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59.
WigginsG. A. (2007). Models of musical similarity. Musicae Scientiae Discussion Forum 4A: Similarity Perception in Listening to Music, 11, 315–338.
