The purpose of this study was to examine the effects and relationships of selected musical variables on the horizontal (i.e., successive eighth note timing relationships) and vertical (i.e., the degree of ensemble synchronicity between separate parts) timing properties of jazz rhythm. A total of 949 eighth note samples from five improvised solos by saxophonist Chris Potter were analysed. Musical variables included metrical beat placement, melodic character, intervals, articulation, underlying harmony, and tempo. Results of the simultaneous multiple regression analyses revealed that intervals preceding and intervals succeeding the sample eighth notes had a significant effect on eighth note durations. Articulation had a significant effect on upbeat beat ratio. The relationships between the relative onset timing data of the saxophone, bass, and drums yielded significant results. There was a large, negative correlation between the relative timing onsets of saxophone and bass, a large negative correlation between saxophone and drums, and a moderate, negative correlation between bass and drums. Implications for the fields of music education, pedagogy, and cognitive psychology are discussed.
AshleyR. (2002). Do(n’t) change a hair for me: The art of jazz rubato. Music Perception, 19(3), 311–332.
2.
BaldwinC. L. (2012). Auditory cognition and human performance: Research and applications. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.
3.
BastianD. T.HostagerT. J. (1988). Jazz as a process organizational innovation. Communication Research, 15(5), 582–602.
4.
BenadonF. (2006). Slicing the beat: Jazz eighth notes as expressive microrhythm. Ethnomusicology, 50(1), 73–98.
5.
BenwardB.WildmanJ. (1984). Jazz improvisation in theory and practice. Dubuque, IA: Wm C. Brown Publishers.
6.
BerlinerP. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BerlinerP. (1997). Give and take: The collective conversation of jazz performance. In SawyerR. (Ed.), Creativity in performance (pp. 9–41). Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishers.
8.
BleshR. (1958). Shining trumpets. New York, NY: Da Capo. (Original work published 1946)
9.
BouenardA.WanderleyM.GibetS. (2010). Virtual gesture control of sound synthesis: Analysis and synthesis of percussion gestures. Acta Acustica, 4(96), 668–677.
10.
BrunerJ. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
ButterfieldM. W. (2010). Participatory discrepancies and the perception of beats in jazz. Music Perception, 27(3), 157–175.
12.
ButterfieldM. W. (2011). Why do jazz musicians swing their eighth notes? Society for Music Theory, 33(1), 3–26.
13.
BusseW. G. (2002). Toward objective measurement and evaluation of jazz piano performance via MIDI-based groove quantize templates. Music Perception, 19(3), 443–461.
14.
ChatziioannouV.HofmannA. (2013, June). Modeling articulation techniques in single-reed woodwind instruments. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, POMA - ICA 2013, Acoustical Society of America, Montreal, Canada, 19.
15.
CholakisE.ParsonsW. (1995). It don’t mean a thing if it ain’t dang, dang-a dang!Downbeat, 8, 61.
16.
ClarkeE. E. (1989). The perception of expressive timing in music. Psychological Research, 51(1), 2–9.
17.
ClynesM. (1987). What can a musician learn about music performance from newly discovered microstructure principles. In GabrielssonA. (Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music. Royal Swedish Academy of Music, 55, 201–233.
18.
CohenT.PotterC.HerbertP.MadsenP. (1999). Diggin’ in, diggin’ out [CD]. New Albany, IN: Double-Time Records.
19.
CollierJ. L. (1978). The making of jazz. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20.
CollierG. L.CollierJ. L. (1994). An exploration of the use of tempo in jazz. Music Perception, 11, 219–242.
21.
CollierG.CollierJ. (1996, August). The swing rhythm in jazz. In PennycookB.Costa-GiomiE. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Montreal (pp. 477–480). Faculty of Music, McGill University, Montreal.
22.
CollierG. L.CollierJ. L. (2002). A study of timing in two Louis Armstrong solos. Music Perception, 19(3), 463–483.
23.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). The domain of creativity. In RuncoM. A.AlbertR. S. (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
24.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology for the third millennium. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
25.
DanielsonA. (2006). Presence and pleasure: The funk grooves of James Brown and Parliament. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
26.
DanielsonA. (2010). Introduction: Rhythm in the age of digital reproduction. In DanielsonA. (Ed.), Musical rhythm in the age of digital technology (pp. 1–16). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
27.
DesainP.HoningH. (1993). Tempo curves considered harmful. Contemporary Music Review7(2), 123–138.
28.
DesainP.HoningH. (1994). Does expressive timing in music performance scale proportionally with tempo?Psychological Research, 56, 285–292.
29.
DunscombJ. R.HillW. (2002). Jazz pedagogy: The jazz educator’s handbook and resource guide. Miami, FL: Warner Bros. Publications.
30.
EllisM. C. (1991). An analysis of “swing” subdivision and asynchronization in three jazz saxophonists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 707–713.
31.
EngelA.KellerP. E. (2011). The perception of musical spontaneity in improvised and imitated jazz performances. Frontiers in Psychology, 2: 83.
32.
FeldmanJ.EpsteinD.RichardsW. (1992). Force dynamics of tempo change in music. Music Perception, 10(2), 185–204.
33.
FraisseP. (1982). Rhythm and tempo. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 149–180). New York: Academic Press.
34.
FribergA.BattelG. U. (2002). Structural communication. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance (pp. 199–218). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
FribergA.SundbergJ. (1999). Does music performance allude to locomotion? A model of final ritardandi derived from measurements of stopping runners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(3), 1469–1484.
36.
FribergA.SundströmA. (2002). Swing ratios and ensemble timing in jazz performance: Evidence for a common rhythmic pattern. Music Perception, 19(3), 333–349.
37.
GabrielssonA. (1999). Music performance. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 501–602). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38.
GoeblW.PalmerC. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians.Music Perception, 26(5), 427–438.
39.
HirshI. J. (1959). Auditory perception of temporal order. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31, 759–767.
40.
HobsonW. (1956). American jazz music. London, UK: J.M. Dent & Son.
41.
HofmannA.ChatziioannouV.WeilguniM.GoeblW.KauselW. (2013, June). Measurement setup for articulatory transient differences in woodwind performance. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, POMA - ICA 2013, Acoustical Society of America, Montreal, Canada, 19.
42.
HofmannA.GoeblW. (2014). Production and perception of legato, portato, and staccato articulation in saxophone playing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00690
43.
HofmannA.GoeblW.WeilguniM. (2013, August). Evaluating a wavelet-based analysis of sensor reed signals for performance research. In BresinR.AskenfeldtA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference 2013, SMAC 13, Stockholm, Sweden, 398–402.
44.
HoningH. (2013). Structure and interpretation of rhythm in music. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd ed., pp. 369–404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
45.
HoningH.de HaasW. B. (2008). Swing once more: Relating timing and tempo in expert jazz drumming. Music Perception, 25(5), 471–476.
46.
IyerV. (2002). Embodied mind, situated cognition, and expressive microtiming in African-American music. Music Perception, 19(3), 387–414.
47.
JacksonP. L.DecetyJ. (2004). Motor cognition: A new paradigm to study self-other interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiolgy, 14(2), 259–263.
48.
JacobP.JeannerodM. (2005). The motor theory of social cognition: A critique. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(1), 21–25.
49.
JeannerodM. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, S103–S109.
JuslinP. N. (2003). Five facets of musical expression: A psychologist’s perspective on music performance. Psychology of Music, 31, 273–302.
52.
JuslinP. N.LaukkaP. (2003). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code?Psychological Bulletin, 5(129), 770–814.
53.
KeilC. M. H. (1966). Motion and feeling through music. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 24(3), 337–349.
54.
KeilC. (1987). Participatory discrepancies and the power of music. Cultural Anthropology, 2(3), 275–283.
55.
KellerP. E. (2008). Joint action in music performance. In MorhantiF.CarassaA.RivaG. (Eds.), Enacting intersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions (pp. 205–221). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
56.
KellerP. E. (2014). Ensemble performance: Interpersonal alignment of musical expression. In FabianD.TimmersR.SchubertE. (Eds.), Expressiveness in music performance: Empirical approaches across styles and cultures (pp. 260–282). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57.
KellerP. E.AppelM. (2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of body movements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception, 28, 27–46.
58.
KellerP. E.WeberA.EngelA. (2011). Practice makes too perfect: Fluctuations in loudness indicate spontaneity in musical improvisation. Music Perception, 29, 107–112.
59.
KendallR. A.CarteretteE. C. (1990). The communication of musical expression. Music Perception, 8, 129–164.
60.
KennyB. J.GellrichM. (2002). Improvisation. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance (pp. 117–134). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
KernfeldB. (1995). What to listen for in jazz. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
62.
KimK. H. (2005). The relation among fit indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 368–390.
63.
KluthA. J. (2006). Chris Potter’s tenor saxophone solo on “The Jones.”Downbeat, 73(10), 180–183.
64.
LartillotO.ToiviainenP. (2007). Motivic matching strategies for automated pattern extraction. Musicae Scientiae, 11(1), 281–314.
65.
LartillotO.ToiviainenP.EerolaT. (2008). A MATLAB toolbox for music information retrieval. In PreisachC.BurkhardtH.Schmidt-ThiemeL.DeckerR. (Eds.), Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Application: Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization (pp. 261–268). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
66.
LashleyK. S (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In JeffriesL. A. (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior: The Hixon Symposium (pp. 112–146). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
67.
LevitinD. J.NuzzoR. L.VinesB. W.RamsayJ. O. (2007). Introduction to functional data analysis. Canadian Psychology, 48(3), 135–155.
68.
LiebmanD. (1997). Understanding jazz rhythm: the concept of swing [DVD]. Stroudsburg, PA: Caris Music Services.
69.
LiebmanD. (2003). On education, the saxophone, & related jazz topics. New Albany, IN: Jamey Aebersold Jazz.
70.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
71.
MacCallumR. C.HongS. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 193–210.
72.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.CaiL. (2006). Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 11, 19–35.
73.
MacDonaldR.WilsonG. (2005). Musical identities of professional jazz musicians: A focus group investigation. Psychology of Music, 33(4), 395–417.
74.
MacDonaldR. A. R.WilsonG. B. (2006). Constructions of jazz: How jazz musicians present their collaborative musical practice. Musicae Scientiae, 10(1), 59–83.
75.
MingusC. (1995). Beneath the underdog. Edinburgh, UK: Payback.
76.
MonsonI. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
77.
PalmerC. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 115–138.
78.
PalmerC. (2013). Music performance: Movement and coordination. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd ed., pp. 405–422). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
79.
PattersonW. M. (2002). The appeal of the primitive jazz. In KoeningK. (Ed.), Jazz in Print (1856–1929): An Anthology of Selected Early Readings in Jazz History. (Reprinted from The Appeal of the Primitive Jazz. Literary Digest, 1917)
80.
PröglerJ. A. (1995). Searching for swing: Participatory discrepancies in the jazz rhythm section. Ethnomusicology, 39, 21–54.
81.
RaschR. A. (1988). Timing and synchronization in ensemble performance. In SlobodaJ. A. (Ed.), Generatve processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 70–90). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
82.
ReinholdssonP. (1987). Approaching jazz performances empirically: Some reflections on methods and problems. In GabrielssonA. (Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music. (pp. 105–125). Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Swedish Academy of Music. Publication No. 55.
83.
ReppB. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 969–992.
84.
ReppB. H.SuY. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent literature (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403–452.
85.
RoseR. L. (1989). An analysis of timing in jazz rhythm section performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 3509A.
86.
SaltzmanJ. (2002). Chris Potter’s tenor sax solo on “This Will Be.”Downbeat, 69(8), 74–75.
87.
SawyerR. K. (1992). Improvisational creativity: An analysis of jazz performance. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 253–263.
88.
SawyerR. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
89.
SchullerG. (1968). Early jazz: Its roots and musical development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
90.
SeddonF. A. (2005). Modes of communication during jazz improvisation. British Journal of Music Education, 22(1), 47–61.
91.
SundbergJ.VerilloV. (1980). On the anatomy of the ritard: A study of timing in music. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 772–779.
92.
ThautM. H. (2005). Rhythm, music, and the brain: Scientific foundations and clinical applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
93.
ThompsonW. F.SundbergJ.FribergA.FrydénL. (1989). The use of rules for expression in the performance of melodies. Psychology of Music, 17, 63–82.
94.
ThomsonV. (1925). The future of American music. Vanity Fair, September, p. 62.
95.
ToddN. (1992). The dynamics of dynamics: A model of musical expression. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(6), 3540–3550.
96.
ToddN. (1985). A model of expressive timing in tonal music. Music Perception, 3, 33–58.
97.
UlanovB. (1952). A history of jazz in America. New York, NY: The Viking Press.
98.
WanderleyM.VinesB.MiddletonN.McCayC.HatchW. (2007). The musical significance of clarinetists’ ancillary gestures: An exploration of the field. Journal of New Music Research, 34(1), 97–113.
99.
WesolowskiB. C. (2013a). Cognition and the assessment of interaction episodes in jazz improvisation. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 23(4), 236–242.
100.
WesolowskiB. C. (2013b). Toward a pedagogy of “swing:” The microstructure of jazz rhythm- a literature review. Research Perspectives in Music Education, 15, 31–44.
101.
WilsonG. B.MacDonaldR. A. R. (2012). The sign of silence: Negotiating musical identities on an improvising ensemble. Psychology of Music, 40(5), 558–573.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
