The cognitive processing similarities between music and language is an emerging field of study, with research finding evidence for shared processing pathways in the brain, especially in relation to syntax. This research combines theory from the shared syntactic integration resource hypothesis (SSIRH; Patel, 2008) and syntactic working memory (SWM) theory (Kljajevic, 2010), and suggests there will be shared processing costs when music and language concurrently access SWM. To examine this, word lists and complex sentences were paired with three music conditions: normal; syntactic manipulation (out-of-key chord); and a control condition with an instrument manipulation. As predicted, memory for sentences declined when paired with the syntactic manipulation compared to the other two music manipulations, but the same pattern did not occur in word lists. This suggests that both sentences and music with a syntactic irregularity are accessing SWM. Word lists, however, are thought to be primarily accessing the phonological loop, and therefore did not show effects of shared processing. Musicians performed differently from non-musicians, suggesting that the processing of musical and linguistic syntax differs with musical ability. Such results suggest a separation in processing between the phonological loop and SWM, and give evidence for shared processing mechanisms between music and language syntax.
AwhE.VogelE.OhS. (2006). Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 201–208.
2.
AyotteJ.PeretzI.HydeK. (2002). Congenital amusia: A group study of adults afflicted with a music-specific disorder. Brain, 125, 238–251. doi:10.1093/brain/awf028
3.
BaddeleyA. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423. doi:10.1016/S1364–6613(00)01538–2
4.
BaddeleyA.HitchG. (1974). Working memory. In SpenceK. W.SpenceJ. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 67–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
5.
BaddeleyA.LewisV.VallarG. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 36, 233–252. doi:10.1080/14640748408402157
6.
BessonM.ChobertJ.MarieC. (2011). Transfer of training between music and speech: Common processing, attention, and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00094
7.
BessonM.FaitaF. (1995). An event-related potential (ERP) study of musical expectancy: Comparison of musicians with nonmusicians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1278–1296. doi:10.1037/0096–1523.21.6.1278
8.
BrandlerS.RammsayerT. (2003). Differences in mental abilities between musicians and non-musicians. Psychology of Music, 31, 123–138. doi:10.1177/0305735603031002290
9.
BrewerW. F.SampaioC.BarlowM. R. (2005). Confidence and accuracy in the recall of deceptive and nondeceptive sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 618–627. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.017
10.
CaplanD.WatersG. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77–94. doi:10.1037/0882–7974.16.1.128
11.
ColtheartM. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 33, 497–505.
12.
EngleR. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23. doi:10.1111/1467–8721.00160
13.
FadigaL.CraigheroL.D’AusilioA. (2009). Broca’s area in language, action and music. The Neurosciences and Music III – Disorders and Plasticity: Annual New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 448–458. doi:10.1111/j.1749–6632.2009.04582.x
14.
FedorenkoE.GibsonE.RohdeD. (2006). The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension: Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 541–553. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.006
15.
FedorenkoE.PatelA.D.CasasantoD.WinawerJ.GibsonE. (2009). Structural integration in language and music: Evidence for a shared system. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1–9. doi:10.3758/MC.37.1.1
16.
FiebachC. J.SchlesewskyM.FriedericiA. D. (2001). Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 321–338. doi:10.1023/A:1010447102554
17.
FiebachC. J.SchlesewskyM.FriedericiA. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: The processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 250–272. doi:10.1016/S0749–596X(02)00004–9
18.
FiebachC. J.SchlesewskyM.LohmannG.CramonD. Y.FriedericiA. D. (2005). Revisiting the role of Broca’s area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory. Human Brain Mapping, 24, 79–91. doi:10.1002/hbm.20070
19.
FrancoisC.SchonD. (2011). Musical expertise boosts implicit learning of both musical and linguistic structures. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 2357–2365. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr022
20.
FranklinM. S.MooreK. S.YipC.JonidesJ.RattrayK.MoherJ. (2008). The effects of musical training on verbal memory. Psychology of Music, 36, 353–365. doi:10.1177/0305735607086044
21.
FriedericiA.RuschemeyerS.HahneA.FiebachC. (2003). The role of the left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 170–177. doi:10.1093/cercor/13.2.170
22.
HelmboldN.RammsayerT.AltenmüllerE. (2005). Differences in primary mental abilities between musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 74–85. doi:10.1027/1614–0001.26.2.74.
23.
HoY.CheungM.ChanA. (2003). Music training improves verbal but not visual memory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations in children. Neuropsychology, 17, 439–450. doi:10.1037/0894–4105.17.3.439
24.
JakobsonL.LewyckyS.KilgourA.StoeszB. (2008). Memory for verbal and visual material in highly trained musicians. Music Perception, 26, 41–55. doi:10.1525/MP.2008.26.1.41
25.
JentschkeS.KoelschS. (2009). Musical training modulates the development of syntax processing in children. NeuroImage, 47, 735–744. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.090
26.
JentschkeS.KoelschS.SallatS.FriedericiA. D. (2008). Children with specific language impairment also show impairment of music-syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1940–1951. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20135
27.
JohanssonB. B. (2008). Language and music: What do they have in common and how do they differ? A neuroscientific approach. European Review, 16, 413–427. doi:10.1017/S1062798708000379
28.
JohnsonJ. A.ZatorreR. J. (2005). Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: Behavioral and neural correlates. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1609–1620. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi039
29.
KaanE.SwaabT. Y. (2002). The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 350–356. doi:10.1016/S1364–6613(02)01947–2
30.
KaneM. J.EngleR. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671.
31.
KilgourA.JakobsonL.CuddyL. (2000). Music training and rate of presentation as mediators of text and song recall. Memory and Cognition, 28, 700–710. doi:10.3758/BF03198404.
32.
KljajevicV. (2010). Is syntactic working memory language specific?Psihologija, 43, 85–101. doi:10.2298/PSI1001085K
33.
KoelschS.GunterT. C.CramonD. Y.ZyssetS.LohmannG.FriedericiA. D. (2002). Bach speaks: A cortical ‘language-network’ serves the processing of music. NeuroImage, 17, 956–966. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1154
34.
KoelschS.GunterT.FriedericiA. D.SchrogerE. (2000). Brain indices of music processing: ‘Nonmusicians’ are musical. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 520–541. doi:10.1162/089892900562183
35.
KoelschS.GunterT. C.WittfothM.SammlerD. (2005). Interaction between syntax processing in language and in music: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1565–1577. doi:10.1162/089892905774597290
36.
KoelschS.JentschkeS. (2010). Differences in electric brain responses to melodies and chords. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2251–2262. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21338
37.
KoelschS.JentschkeS.SammlerD.MietchenD. (2007). Untangling syntactic and sensory processing: An ERP study of music processing. Psychophysiology, 44, 476–490. doi:10.1111/j.1469–8986.2007.00517.x
38.
KoelschS.KasperE.SammlerD.SchulzeK.GunterT.FriedericiA. D. (2004). Music, language and meaning: Brain signatures of semantic processing. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 302–307. doi:10.1038/nn1197
39.
LarkinW.BurnsD. (1977). Sentence comprehension and memory for embedded structure. Memory and Cognition, 5, 17–22. doi:10.3758/BF03209186
40.
LevitinD. J.MenonV. (2003). Musical structure is processed in ‘language’ areas of the brain: A possible role for Brodmann area 47 in temporal coherence. NeuroImage, 20, 2142–2152. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.016
41.
MaessB.KoelschS.GunterT. C.FriedericiA. D. (2001). Musical syntax is processed in Broca’s area: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 540–545. doi:10.1038/87502
42.
MarquesC.MorenoS.CastroS. L.BessonM. (2007). Musicians detect pitch violations in a foreign language better than nonmusicians: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1453–1463. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1453
43.
MartinR. (1993). Short-term memory and sentence processing: Evidence from neuropsychology. Memory and Cognition, 21, 176–183. doi:10.3758/BF03202730
44.
MithenS. (2009). The music instinct: The evolutionary basis of musicality. Neurosciences and Music III – Disorders and Plasticity: Annual New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 3–12. doi:10.1111/j.1749–6632.2009.04590.x
45.
NairneJ. (2002). Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 53, 53–81.
46.
OveryK.AvanziniG. (2009). Music, language, and motor programming: A common neural organization?The Neurosciences and Music III – Disorders and Plasticity: Annual New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 446–447. doi:10.1111/j.1749–6632.2009.04882.x
47.
PatelA. D. (2003). Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 674–681. doi:10.1038/nn1082
48.
PatelA. D. (2007, May). Language, music and the brain: A resource sharing framework. Paper presented at Language and Music as Cognitive Systems, 11–13 May, Cambridge University, UK.
49.
PatelA. D. (2008). Music, language and the brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
50.
PatelA. D.GibsonE.RatnerJ.BessonM.HolcombP. J. (1998). Processing syntactic relations in language and music: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 717–733. doi:10.1162/089892998563121
51.
PatelA. D.IversenJ. R.HagoortP. (2004). Musical syntactic processing in Broca’s aphasia: A preliminary study. In LipscombS. D.GjerdingenR. O.WebsterP. (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth international conference on music perception and cognition (pp. 797–800). Adelaide, Australia: Causal Productions.
PeretzI. (2006). The nature of music from a biological perspective. Cognition, 100, 1–32. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.004
54.
PeretzI.ColtheartM. (2003). Modularity of music processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 688–691. doi:10.1038/nn1083
55.
PiccirilliM.SciarmaT.LuzziS. (2000). Modularity of music: Evidence from a case of pure amusia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 69, 541–545. doi:10.1136/jnnp.69.4.541
56.
RobertsL.FelserC. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in second language sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 299–331. doi:10.1017/S0142716410000421.
57.
RodriguesA. C.LoureiroM. A.CaramelliP. (2010). Musical training, neuroplasticity and cognition. Dementia e Neuropsychologia, 4, 277–286. Retrieved from www.demneuropsy.com.br/resumo.asp?id=240
58.
SammlerD.KoelschS.FriedericiA. D. (2011). Are left fronto-temporal brain areas a prerequisite for normal music-syntactic processing?Cortex, 47, 659–673. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.04.007
59.
SlevcR. L.MiyakeA. (2006). Individual differences in second-language proficiency: Does musical ability matter?Psychological Science, 17, 675–681. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01765
60.
SlevcR. L.RosenbergJ. C.PatelA. D. (2009). Making psycholinguistics musical: Self-paced reading time evidence for shared processing of linguistic and musical syntax. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 374–381. doi:10.3758/16.2.374
61.
StoweL. A.WithaarR. G.WijersA. A.BroereC. A.PaansA. M. (2002). Encoding and storage in working memory during sentence comprehension. In MerloP.StevensonS. (Eds.), The lexical basis of sentence processing: Formal, computational and experimental issues (pp. 181–205). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
62.
TzortzisC.GoldblumM.DangM.ForetteF.BollerF. (2000). Absence of amusia and preserved naming of musical instruments in an aphasic composer. Cortex, 36, 227–242. doi:10.1016/S0010–9452(08)70526–4
63.
UchiyamaY.ToyodaH.HondaM.YoshidaH.KochiyamaT.EbeK.SadatoN. (2008). Functional segregation of the inferior frontal gyrus for syntactic processes: A functional magnetic-resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Research, 61, 309–318. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2008.03.013
64.
VallarG.BaddeleyA.D. (1984). Fractionation of working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for a phonological short-term store. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 151–161.doi:10.1016/S0022–5371(84)90104-X
65.
WolpertR. (2000). Attention to key in a nondirected music listening task: Musicians vs. non-musicians. Music Perception, 18, 225–230.
