Research shows that strong right-handedness is associated with decreased cognitive flexibility and decreased tendencies to update beliefs, arising from decreased interhemispheric interaction. In the current study, strong right-handedness was associated with decreased overall liking of less popular musical genres (with the specific genres of bluegrass and reggae attaining significance) and marginally increased preference for more popular genres (with popularity being indexed by recording industry sales figures), providing further evidence for decreased cognitive flexibility in strong right-handers and suggesting that strength of handedness is an important factor in individual differences in musical preferences.
BrysonF.M.GrimshawG.M.WilsonM.S. (2009). The role of intellectual openness in the relationship between hand preference and positive schizotypy. Laterality, 14(5), 441–456.
2.
ChristmanS.D. (1993). Handedness in musicians: Bimanual constraints on performance. Brain and Cognition, 22(2), 266–272.
3.
ChristmanS.D. (2001). Individual differences in Stroop and local-global processing: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction’, Brain and Cognition, 45(1), 97–118.
4.
ChristmanS.D. (2008). Individual differences in right-wing authoritarianism: Handedness and cognitive rigidity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
5.
ChristmanS.D. (2010). Eclectic lefty-hand: Jimi Hendrix, handedness, and Electric Ladyland. Laterality, 15(1-2), 253–269.
6.
ChristmanS.D.HenningB.GeersA.L.PropperR.E.NiebauerC.L. (2008). Mixed-handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: Interhemispheric interaction and belief updating. Laterality, 13(5), 403–426.
7.
ChristmanS.D.JasperJ.D.SontamV.CooilB. (2007). Individual differences in risk perception versus risk taking: Handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition, 63(1), 51–58.
8.
ChristmanS.D.SontamV.JasperJ.D. (2009). Individual differences in ambiguous figure perception: Degree of handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Perception, 38(8), 1183–1198.
9.
ClarkeJ.M.ZaidelE. (1994). Anatomical-behavioral relationships: Corpus callosum morphometry and hemispheric specialization. Behavioural Brain Research, 64(1-2), 185–202.
10.
DenenbergV.H.KerteszA.CowellP.E. (1991). A factor analysis of the human’s corpus callosum, Brain Research, 548(1-2), 126–132.
11.
DrakeR.A. (1993). Processing persuasive arguments: II. Discounting of truth and relevance as a function of agreement and manipulated activation asymmetry. Journal of Research in Personality, 27(2), 184–196.
12.
GlasgowM.R.CartierA.M. (1985). Conservatism, sensation-seeking and music preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(4), 393–5.
13.
GunstadJ.SpitznagelM.B.LuysterF.CohenR.A.PaulR.H. (2007). Handedness and cognition across the healthy lifespan. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117(4), 477–485.
14.
HargreavesD.J. (1982). Preference and prejudice in music: A psychological approach. Popular Music and Society, 8(3-4), 13–18.
15.
JasperJ.D.BarryK.ChristmanS.D. (2008). Individual differences in counterfactual production. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 488–492.
16.
NiebauerC.L.AselageJ.SchutteC. (2002). Interhemispheric interaction and consciousness: Degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion. Laterality, 7(1), 85–96.
17.
NiebauerC.L.ChristmanS.D.ReidS.A.GarveyK. (2004). Interhemispheric interaction and beliefs on our origin: Degree of handedness predicts beliefs in creationism versus evolution. Laterality, 9(4), 433–447.
18.
NorthA.C.HargreavesD.J. (2007). Lifestyle correlates of musical preference: 1. Relationships, living arrangements, beliefs, and crime. Psychology of Music, 35(1), 58–87.
19.
OldfieldR.L. (1971). The assessment of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.
20.
PetersM.MurphyK. (1992). Cluster analysis reveals at least three, and possibly five distinct handedness groups. Neuropsychologia, 30(4), 373–373.
21.
PropperR.E.ChristmanS.D.PhaneufK.A. (2005). A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: A possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 751–757.
22.
RamachandranV.S. (1995). Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition, 4(1), 22–51.
23.
RauschR. (1977). Cognitive strategies in patients with unilateral temporal lobe excisions. Neuropsychologia, 15(3), 385–395.
24.
SchacterS.C. (1994). Ambilaterality: Definition from handedness preference questionnaires and potential significance. International Journal of Neuroscience, 77(1–2), 47–51.
25.
ShobeE.R.RossN.M.FleckJ.I. (2009). Influence of handedness and bilateral eye movements on creativity. Brain and Cognition, 71(3), 214–214.
26.
SontamV.ChristmanS.D.JasperJ.D. (2009). Individual differences in semantic switching flexibility: Effects of handedness. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(6), 1023–1027.
27.
WitelsonS.F.GoldsmithC.H. (1991). The relationship of hand preference to anatomy of the corpus callosum in men. Brain Research, 545(1-2), 175–182.
