Researchers in recent years have increasingly placed an emphasis on seeking pupils’ perceptions of educational settings. Alongside this shift towards attaching value to the pupil viewpoint has been a growing interest concerning how interpersonal relationships, manifested as control or responsiveness between teachers and pupils or parents and pupils, impact on learning processes and outcomes. This study aimed first to elicit pupils’ perceptions of their interpersonal interactions with teachers and parents, in the context of learning a musical instrument. The second aim was to explore whether dimensions of interpersonal interaction could account for variability in learning outcomes. Three hundred and thiry-seven violin pupils were surveyed, and measures for the interpersonal dimensions of control and responsiveness, as well as measures for outcomes that were defined as self-esteem, self-efficacy, motivation, enjoyment of music and musical attainment, were collected. A principal component analysis of the control and responsiveness scales was carried out. Multiple regressions revealed that receptiveness to parental support and pupil—teacher accord accounted for significant variability in the learning outcomes. The research reported here adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that the interpersonal dynamics of pupil—parent and pupil—teacher dyads represent a powerful influence in pupils’ experiences of learning musical instruments.
Austin, J., & Haefner Berg, M. (2006). Exploring music practice among sixth-grade band and orchestra students. Psychology of Music, 34(4), 535-558.
2.
Baumrind, D. ( 1989). Rearing competent children. In W. Damon (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 349-378). London: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Baumrind, D. ( 2005). Patterns of Parental authority and adolescent autonomy . New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 108, 61-69.
4.
Birtchnell, J. ( 1993). How humans relate: A new interpersonal theory. Hove: Psychology Press.
5.
Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
6.
Brekelmans, M. ( 1989). Interpersoonlijk gedrag von docenten in de klas (Interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom). Utrecht, The Netherlands: WCC.
7.
Briggs, S., & Cheek, J. ( 1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106-148.
8.
Brokaw, J.P. ( 1982). The extent to which parental supervision and other selected factors are related to achievement of musical and technical-physical characteristics by beginning instrumental music students. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
9.
Brown, B.B., Mounts, N., Lamborn, S.D., & Steinberg, L. ( 1993). Parenting practices and peer group affiliation in adolescence , Child Development, 64(2), 467-482.
10.
Creech, A. ( 2001). Play for me: An exploration into motivations, issues and outcomes related to parental involvement in their children’s violin study. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Sheffield .
11.
Creech, A. ( 2006). Dynamics, harmony and discord: A systems analysis of teacher-pupil-parent interaction in instrumental learning. Unpublished PhD thesis, Institute of Education, University of London.
12.
Creech, A. ( 2008). The role of the family in supporting learning. In S. Hallam (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (pp. 295-306). Oxford: OUP.
13.
Creton, H., & Wubbels, T. ( 1984). Discipline problems with beginning teachers. Utrecht, The Netherlands: WCC.
14.
Crozier, G. ( 1999). Parent involvement: Who wants it?International Studies in Sociology of Education, 9(2), 111-130.
15.
Davidson, J., & Borthwick, S.J. (2002). Family dynamics and family scripts: A case study of musical development. Psychology of Music, 30(1), 121-136.
16.
Davidson, J., Howe, M., Moore, D., & Sloboda, J. ( 1996). The role of parental influences in the development of musical performance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology , 14(4), 399-412.
17.
Davidson, J., Howe, M., & Sloboda, J. ( 1995). The role of parents and teachers in the success and failure of instrumental learners. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 127, 40-44.
18.
Doan, G. ( 1973). An investigation of the relationships between parental involvement and the performance ability of violin students. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.
19.
Downie, R.S., Loufoot, E.M., & Telfer, E. ( 1974). Education and personal relationships. London: Methuen & Co Ltd.
20.
Duke, R.A. ( 1999). Measures of instructional effectiveness in music research . Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education , 143, 1-42.
21.
Easton, C. ( 1989). Jacqueline du Pré: A biography. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
22.
Field, A. ( 2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
23.
Fisher, D.L., Fraser, B.J., & Wubbels, T. ( 1992). Teacher communication style and school environment. Paper presented at the ECER Conference, Enshede , The Netherlands, 22-25 June.
24.
Galloway, J. (2002). Clara. London: Jonathan Cape.
25.
Grolnick, W. ( 1997). Predictors of parent involvement in children’s schooling, Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 538-548.
26.
Gustafson, R. ( 1986). Effects of interpersonal dynamics in the student-teacher dyads on diagnostic and remedial content of four private violin lessons. Psychology of Music, 14(2), 130-139.
27.
Hallam, S. ( 2006). Music psychology in education. London : Institute of Education, University of London.
28.
Henry, M. ( 1996). Young children, parents, and professionals: Enhancing the links in early childhood. London: Routledge.
29.
Heston, M., Dedrick, C., Raschke, D., & Whitehead, J. ( 1996). Job satisfaction and stress among band directors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(4): 319-327.
30.
Hulsebosch, P. ( 1991). Beauty in the eye of the beholder: How and why teachers involve parents. International Journal of Educational Research , 15(2), 183-200.
31.
Johnson, D. ( 1991). Parents, students and teachers: A three-way relationship . International Journal of Educational Research, 15(2), 171-181.
32.
Jorgensen, E.R. ( 1998). Modeling aspects of type IV music instructional triads . Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education , 137, 43-56.
33.
Kaiser, H.F. ( 1960). The Application of electronic computers to factor analysis , Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
34.
Kulieke, M.J., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1989). The influence of family values and climate on the development of talent. In J.L. VanTassel-Baska & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners (pp. 40-59). New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
Lamont, A. ( 2002). Musical identities and the school environment. In R. MacDonald, D. Hargreaves & D. Miell (Eds.), Musical identities (pp. 41-59). Oxford: OUP.
36.
Leary, T. ( 1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York: Ronald Press Company.
37.
Maccoby, E., & Martin, J. ( 1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In E.M. Hetherington & P.H. Mussen (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 4. Socialization, personality and social development (pp. 1-101). New York: Wiley.
38.
MacGilchrist, B., Myers, K., & Reed, J. ( 1997). The intelligent school. London: Chapman.
39.
Manturzewska, M. ( 1990). A biographical study of the life-span development of professional musicians. Psychology of Music, 18(2), 112-139.
40.
McPherson, G., & Davidson, J. ( 2006) Playing an instrument. In G. McPherson (Ed.), The child as musician: A handbook of musical development (pp. 331-351). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
Menuhin, Y. ( 1977). Unfinished journey. London: Macdonald and Jane’s Publishers Ltd.
42.
Noack, P. ( 1998). School achievement and adolescents’ interactions with their fathers, mothers, and friends. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIII(4), 503-513.
43.
Noddings, N. ( 1988). An ethic of caring and its implications for instructional arrangements. American Journal of Education, 96(2), 215-230.
44.
Noller, P., Feeney, J.A., & Peterson, C. ( 2001). Personal relationships across the lifespan. Hove: Psychology Press.
45.
O’Neill, S. ( 2002). Young people and music participation project. Unit for the Study of Musical Skill and Development, Keele University. Retrieved 11 June 2002, from www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ps/ESRC/Preportell.doc
46.
Persson, R.S. ( 1995). Psychosocial stressors among student musicians: A naturalistic study of the teacher-student relationship, International Journal of Arts Medicine, IV(2), 7-13.
47.
Pruett, K. ( 2003). First patrons: Parenting the musician. Paper presented at 21st Annual Symposium on the Medical Problems of Musicians and Dancers, Aspen, Colorado.
48.
Rife, N.A., Shnek, Z.M., Lauby, J.L., & Lapidus, L.B. ( 2001). Children’s satisfaction with private music lessons . Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(1), 21-32.
49.
Ryan, R.M., Stiller, J.D., & Lynch, J.H. ( 1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 226- 249.
50.
Schmidt, C.P. ( 1989a). Applied music teaching behaviors as a function of selected personality variables. Journal of Research in Music Education , 37(4), 258-271.
51.
Schmidt, C.P. ( 1989b). Individual differences in perception of applied music teaching feedback. Psychology of Music, 17(2), 110-112.
52.
Schmidt, C.P., & Stephans, R. ( 1991). Locus of control and field dependence as factors in students evaluations of applied music instruction, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73(1), 131-136.
53.
Schultz Jorgensen, P. ( 2004). Children’s participation in a democratic learning environment. In J. MacBeath and L. Moos (Eds.), Democratic learning (pp. 113-131). London: Routledge Falmer.
54.
Sloboda, J., & Howe, M. ( 1991). Biographical precursors of musical excellence: An interview study. Psychology of Music, 19(1), 3-21.
55.
Sloboda, J., & Howe, M. ( 1992). Transitions in the early musical careers of able young musicians: Choosing instruments and teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40(4), 283-294.
56.
Solomon, M. ( 1994). Mozart: A life. London: Hutchinson.
57.
Sosniak, L.A. ( 1985). Learning to be a concert pianist. In B.S. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 19-67). New York: Ballantine .
58.
Sosniak, L.A. ( 1990). The tortoise, the hare, and the development of talent . In M. Howe (Ed.), Encouraging the development of exceptional skills and talents (pp. 149-164). Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
59.
Steinberg, L., Elmen, J., & Mounts, N. ( 1989). Authoritative parenting, Psychosocial maturity and academic success among adolescents. Child Development, 60(6), 1424-1436.
60.
Stevens, J.P. ( 1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61.
Tubbs, S.L. ( 1984). A systems approach to small group interaction. New York: Random House.
62.
Van Tartwijk, J., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. ( 1998). Students’ perceptions of teacher interpersonal style: The front of the classroom as the teacher’s stage. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(6), 607-617.
63.
Weschler-Vered, A. ( 1986). Jascha Heifetz. New York: Schirmer Books.
64.
Wubbels, T., Creton, H., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. (1987). The perception of the teacher-student relationship. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 12, 3-16.
65.
Wubbels, T., Creton, H., & Levy, J. ( 1993). The model for interpersonal teacher behaviour. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 13-28). London: Falmer Press.
66.
Zdzinski, S. ( 1996). Parental involvement, selected student attributes and learning outcomes in instrumental music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(1), 34-48.
