Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Berlyne (1971) and others have proposed that liking of music is an inverted-U shaped function of its complexity. Past research has been inconclusive concerning the generality of the inverted-U relationship. The present studies tested the generality of this relationship across related but distinct musical styles. Our experimental participants judged the complexity and liking of short pieces of music created by professional musicians who where instructed to improvise at different levels of complexity. Experiment 1 tested whether the inverted-U relationship was present between perceived complexity and liking for jazz and bluegrass when each style was presented separately. Experiment 2 replicated the findings from Experiment 1 under interleaved presentation conditions. The results support the inverted-U shaped relationship between perceived complexity and liking for bluegrass but not for jazz. It is possible that the relationship between liking and perceived musical complexity varies across musical styles.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Crozier, J. B. (1974). Verbal and exploratory responses to sound sequences varying in uncertainty level. In: D. E. Berlyne (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics, pp. 27-90. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere.

Cupchik, G. C. and Winston, A. S. (1996). Confluence and divergence in empirical aesthetics, philosophy, and mainstream psychology. In: M. P. Friedman and E. C. Carterette (Eds.), Cognitive Ecology, pp. 61-85. New York: Academic Press.

Davies, J. B. (1978). The Psychology of Music. London: Hutchinson.

Hargreaves, D. J. (1984). The effects of repetition on liking for music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32(1), 35-47.

Hekkert, P. and van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1990). Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 483-495.

Heyduk, R. G. (1975). Rated preference for musical composition as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 84-91.

Konecni, V. J. (1982). Social interaction and musical preference. In: D. Deutsch (Ed.), The Psychology of Music. New York: Academic Press.

Martindale, C. (1984). The pleasures of thought: A theory of cognitive hedonics. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 49-80.

10.

Martindale, C. (1988). Cognition, psychobiology, and aesthetics. In: F. Farley and R. Neperud (Eds.), The foundation of aesthetics, art, and art education, pp. 7-42. New York: Praeger.

11.

Martindale, C. and Moore, K. (1989). Relationship of musical preference to collative, ecological, and psychophysical variables. Music Perception, 6(4), 431-445.

12.

North, A. C. and Hargreaves, D. J. (1995). Subjective complexity, familiarity, and liking for popular music. Psychomusicology, 14, 77-93.

13.

North, A. C. and Hargreaves, D. J. (1996a). Responses to music in a dining area. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(6), 491-501.

14.

North, A. C. and Hargreaves, D. J. (1996b). Responses to music in aerobic exercise and yogic relaxation classes. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 535-547.

15.

North, A. C. and Hargreaves, D. J. (1997). Liking for musical styles. Musicae Scientiae, 1(1).

16.

Orr, M. and Ohlsson, S. (1999). The inverted-U hypothesis: Can it predict expert behavior? Paper presented at the Society for Music Perception and Cognition Bi-Annual Conference, Evanston, Illinois, U.S.A.

17.

Russell, P. A. (1982). Relationships between judgements of the complexity, pleasingness and interestingness of music. Current Psychological Research, 2, 195-202.

18.

Simon, C. R. and Wohlwill, J. F. (1968). An experimental study of the role of expectation and variation in music. Journal of Research in Music Eduaction, 16, 227-238.

19.

Sluckin, W. , Hargreaves, D. J. and Colman, A. M. (1983). Novelty and human aesthetic preferences. In: J. Archer and L. Birke (Eds.), Exploration in animals and humans. London: Van Nostrand.

20.

Smith, J. D. and Melara, R. J. (1990). Aesthetic preference and syntactic prototypicality in music: 'Tis the gift to be simple. Cognition, 34(3), 279-298.

21.

Steck, L. and Machotka, P. (1975). Preference for musical complexity: Effect of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 54-61.

22.

Stimson, J. A. , Carmines, E. G. and Zeller, R. A. (1981). Interpreting Polynomial Regression. In: P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Linear models in social research, pp. 88-96. Sage.

23.

Vitz, P. C. (1966). Affect as a function of stimulus variation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 74-79.

24.

Walker, E. L. (1980). Psychological complexity and preference: A hedgehog theorv of behavior. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole.

25.

Zillmann, D. and Gan, S. (1997). Musical taste in adolescence. In: D. J. Hargreaves and A. C. North (Eds.), The social psychology of music, pp. 161-187). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

The Relationship Between Musical Complexity and Liking in Jazz and Bluegrass

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References