When we occupy the spaces of war memorials, we respond with certain bodily comportments that relay the “truth” of those killed by war violence. Through a phenomenological examination of embodied responses to two war memorials, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall and the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at Arlington National Cemetery, I argue that social institutions employ bodies as a means of legitimizing a violence that is seen as redemptive. More specifically, I demonstrate how the redemptive quality of certain types of violence is an assumption replicated in social practices where individuals have learned the particular bodily skills of discourses surrounding redemptive violence.
AhmedS. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
2.
AzoulayA. (2001). Death’s showcase: The power of image in contemporary democracy. The MIT Press.
3.
BerdahlD. (1994). Voices at the wall: Discourses of self, history and national identity at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. History and Memory, 6, 88-124.
4.
CarlsonA. C.HockingJ. E. (1988). Strategies of redemption at the Vietnam Veterans’ Memorial. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52(Summer), 203-215.
5.
CooleD. (2007a). Experiencing discourse: Corporeal communicators and the embodiment of power. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9, 413-433.
6.
CooleD. (2007b). Merleau-ponty and modern politics after anti-humanism. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
7.
CrossleyN. (1996). Body-subject/body-power: Agency, inscription and control in Foucault and Merleau-Ponty. Body and Society, 2, 99-116.
8.
CrossleyN. (2004). Phenomenology, structuralism, and history: Merleau-Ponty’s social theory. Theoria, 103, 88-121.
9.
DuongK. (2020) The virtues of violence: Democracy against disintegration in modern France. Oxford University Press.
10.
EdkinsJ. (2003). Trauma and the memory of politics. Cambridge University Press.
11.
FoucaultM. (1980a). Body/power. In GordonC. (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (pp. 55-62). The Harvester Press.
12.
FoucaultM. (1980b). The eye of power. In GordonC. (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977 (pp. 146-165). The Harvester Press.
13.
FoucaultM. (1983). The subject and power. In DreyfusH. L.RabinowP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). The University of Chicago Press.
14.
FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline and punish. Vintage Books.
15.
FoucaultM. (1998). Nietzsche, genealogy, and history. In FaubionJ. (Ed.), The essential works of Michel Foucault Vol. 2: Aesthetics, method, and epistemology (pp. 369-391). The New Press.
16.
HamilakisY. (2009). The “War on Terror” and the military–archaeology complex: Iraq, ethics, and neo-colonialism. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress, 5, 39-65.
17.
HawleyT. M. (2005). The remains of war: Bodies, politics, and the search for American Soldiers unaccounted for in Southeast Asia. Duke University Press.
MayoJ. (1988). War memorials as political memory. Geographical Review, 78, 62-75.
26.
Merleau-PontyM. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27.
Merleau-PontyM. (1964). Signs. Northwestern University Press.
28.
Merleau-PontyM. (1965). The structure of behaviour. Methuen.
29.
Merleau-PontyM. (1988). Institution in personal and public history. In Praise of philosophy: Themes from the lectures at the College de France (pp. 107-113). Northwestern University Press.
30.
SturkenM. (1991). The wall, the screen, and the image: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Representations, 35, 118-142.
31.
United States. Cong. (July 1, 1980). Joint resolution to authorize the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, Inc., to establish a memorial. Pub. Law No. 96-297, 96th Congress.
32.
Wagner-PacificiR.SchwartzB. (1991). The Vietnam Veterans Memorial: Commemorating a difficult past. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 376-420.
33.
WinkW. (1999). The powers that be: Theology for a new millennium. Doubleday.
