Preliminary studies have demonstrated that reducing material temperature enhances the wetness perception and decreases the friction coefficient during skin-material interactions. However, the effects of changes in frictional force due to temperature variations on wetness perception, and the effects of contact temperature on surface roughness perception during active dynamic interactions between skin and fabrics remain poorly investigated. This study recruited 12 participants (6 females and 6 males) to touch dry fabrics at different contact temperatures (8, 16, and 24 °C) to obtain frictional force, surface roughness, and wetness perception scores. Each participant was asked to complete 45 assessments: 3 contact temperatures (8, 16, and 24 °C) × 5 fabric types (cotton, silk, wool, flax, and jute) × 3 repetitions. The results suggested that the surface roughness perception decreased while the wetness perception increased with lower contact temperatures, the fabric type significantly influenced the perception, but there is no significant correlation between frictional force and wetness perception. This study enhances the understanding of thermal modulation in perception, providing valuable insights for designing healthcare textile products that minimize skin damage and improve comfort during prolonged contact.
AktarT.ChenJ.EttelaieR.HolmesM.HensonB. (2017). Human roughness perception and possible factors effecting roughness sensation. Journal of Texture Studies, 48, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12245
2.
BabyR.MathurK.DenHartogE. (2021). Skin-textiles friction: Importance and prospects in skin comfort and in healthcare in prevention of skin injuries. Journal of the Textile Institute, 112, 1514–1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2020.1827582
3.
ChoiC.MaY.LiX.ChatterjeeS.SequeiraS.FriesenR. F.FeltsJ. R.HipwellM. C. (2022). Surface haptic rendering of virtual shapes through change in surface temperature. Science Robotics, 7, eabl4543. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abl4543
4.
Di StefanoN.SpenceC. (2022). Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspe-ctive. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 84, 2087–2114. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02550-y
FilingeriD. (2014). Why wet feels wet?: An investigation into the neurophysiology of human skin wetness perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 112, 1457–1469. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00120.2014
7.
FilingeriD.AckerleyR. (2017). The biology of skin wetness perception and its implicati-ons in manual function and for reproducing complex somatosensory signals in neuropr-osthetics. Journal of Neurophysiology, 117, 1761–1775. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00883.2016
8.
FilingeriD.RedortierB.HodderS.HavenithG. (2013). The role of decreasing contact temperatures and skin cooling in the perception of skin wetness. Neuroscience Letters, 551, 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.07.015
9.
FilingeriD.RedortierB.HodderS.HavenithG. (2014). Thermal and tactile interactions in the perception of local skin wetness at rest and during exercise in thermo-neutral and warm environments. Neuroscience, 258, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.019
10.
MerrickC.RosatiR.FilingeriD. (2022). The role of friction on skin wetness perception during dynamic interactions between the human index finger pad and materials of va-rying moisture content. Journal of Neurophysiology, 127, 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00382.2021
11.
RaccugliaM.HodderS.HavenithG. (2017). Human wetness perception in relation to textile water absorption parameters under static skin contact. Textile Research Journal, 87, 2449–2463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517516671127
12.
RaccugliaM.PistakK.HeydeC.QuJ.MaoN.HodderS.HavenithG. (2018). Human wetness perception of fabrics under dynamic skin contact. Textile Research Journal, 88, 2155–2168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517517716905
13.
SkedungL.DanerlovK.OlofssonU.JohannessonC. M.AikalaM.KettleJ.ArvidssonM.BerglundB.RutlandM. W. (2011). Tactile perception: Finger friction, surfa-ce roughness and perceived coarseness. Tribology International, 44, 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2010.04.010
14.
TanY. (2024). Effect of fabric roughness and softness on skin wetness perception under dry and cold stimuli. Donghua University.
15.
TangK.-P. M.ChauK.-H.KanC.-W.FanJ.-T. (2018). Instrumental evaluation of stic-kiness of textiles under wet skin surface. IEEE Access, 6, 24777–24792. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2829151
16.
TemelM.JohnsonA. A.LloydA. B. (2023). Body mapping of skin friction coefficient and tactile perception during the dynamic skin-textile interaction. Ergonomics, 66, 1449–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2022.2152112
17.
ValenzaA.RykaczewskiK.MartinezD. M.BiancoA.CaggiariS.WorsleyP.Filin-geriD. (2023). Thermal modulation of skin friction at the finger pad. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 146, 106072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106072
18.
van KuilenburgJ.MasenM. A.van der HeideE. (2015). A review of fingerpad contact mechanics and friction and how this affects tactile perception. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part J-Journal of Engineering Tribology, 229, 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650113504908
19.
VeijgenN. K.MasenM. A.van der HeideE. (2013). Relating friction on the human skin to the hydration and temperature of the skin. Tribology Letters, 49, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-012-0062-1
20.
YinL.ShimE.DenHartogE. (2020). A study of skin physiology, sensation and friction of nonwoven fabrics used in absorbent hygiene products in neutral and warm environments. Biotribology, 24, 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotri.2020.100149
21.
ZhangZ.TangX.LiJ.YangW. (2020). The effect of dynamic friction with wet fabrics on skin wetness perception. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 26, 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1453023
22.
ZhaoQ.HuJ.YangX.DingX. (2014). Discrimination characteristics of physical determinants for tactile roughness sensation of fabric surface textures. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 13th International Conference on Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering, MMESE 2013, October 21, 2013– October 25, 2013, Yantai, China.
23.
ZhouX.MoJ. L.LiY. Y.XuJ. Y.ZhangX.CaiS.JinZ. M. (2018). Correlation between tactile perception and tribological and dynamical properties for human finger under different sliding speeds. Tribology International, 123, 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2018.03.012
