The scintillating grid illusion induces the phenomena of disappearance and scintillation. However, it is unclear in which peripheral region these phenomena occur. This study aimed to investigate the spatial properties of disappearance and scintillation phenomena in the scintillating grid illusion. In Experiment 1, participants binocularly observed a single-unit scintillating grid illusion and responded whether a white disk and illusory blackness were perceived. As a result, the perceptual region of the white disk was larger in the horizontal direction than in the vertical direction, as well as the perceptual region of the illusory blackness. This result indicates that both perceptual regions have spatial anisotropy. In Experiment 2, the same task as in Experiment 1 was performed with monocular viewing. The results did not exactly reject spatial anisotropy in monocular vision, regardless of the perceptual regions. This study may contribute to understanding how disappearance and scintillation phenomena coexist in the scintillating grid illusion.
AraragiY.KitaokaA. (2011). Increment of the extinction illusion by long stimulation. Perception, 40(5), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6757
2.
BarrettJ. J.ChatterjeeA.MennemeierM. S.FuhrP. S.NovackT. A. (2002). Influence of reference frames on asymmetries in Troxler’s effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.94.1.29
3.
BertaminiM.CretenoudA. F.HerzogM. H. (2019). Exploring the extent in the visual field of the honeycomb and extinction illusions. i-Perception, 10(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669519854784
4.
BertaminiM.HerzogM. H.BrunoN. (2016). The honeycomb illusion: Uniform textures not perceived as such. i-Perception, 7(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516660727
5.
BertaminiM.OlettoC. M.ContemoriG. (2024). The role of uniform textures in making texture elements visible in the visual periphery. Open Mind, 8, 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00136
DevyatkoD.AppelbaumL. G.MitroffS. R. (2017). A common mechanism for perceptual reversals in motion-induced blindness, the Troxler effect, and perceptual filling-in. Perception, 46(1), 50–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616672577
GeierJ.BernáthL.HudákM.SéraL. (2008). Straightness as the main factor of the Hermann grid illusion. Perception, 37(5), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5622
12.
GonzálezE. G.WeinstockM.SteinbachM. J. (2007). Peripheral fading with monocular and binocular viewing. Vision Research, 47(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.013
HermannL. (1870). Eine erscheinung simultanen contrastes. Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 3, 13–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01855743
15.
IkedaM.TakeuchiT. (1975). Influence of foveal load on the functional visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(4), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199371
16.
IshiharaS. (1917). Tests for color-blindness. Handaya, Tokyo.
17.
IstiqomahN.SuzukiY.KinzukaY.MinamiT.NakauchiS. (2022). Anisotropy in the peripheral visual field based on pupil response to the glare illusion. Heliyon, 8(6), Article e09772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09772
KimY.DykemaJ.StevensonJ.BlackP.MobergD. P. (2019). Straightlining: Overview of measurement, comparison of indicators, and effects in mail–web mixed-mode surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 37(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317752406
20.
LegrasR.GaudricA.WoogK. (2018). Distribution of cone density, spacing and arrangement in adult healthy retinas with adaptive optics flood illumination. PLoS ONE, 13(1), Article e0191141. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191141
21.
LevineM. W.AndersonJ. E.McAnanyJ. J. (2012). Effects of orientation and contrast upon targets in straight and curved arrays. Perception, 41(12), 1419–1433. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7237
22.
LevineM. W.McAnanyJ. J. (2008). The effects of curvature on the grid illusions. Perception, 37(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5691
23.
MarrD.HildrethE. (1980). Theory of edge detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 207(1167), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1980.0020
24.
MatsunoT. (2019). Fission line illusion. The 11th Illusion Contest in Japan.
MatsunoT. (2022). Ring grid illusion. The 14th Illusion Contest in Japan.
27.
MatsunoT.SatoY. (2019). Dissociation of perceived size and perceived strength in the scintillating grid illusion. Journal of Vision, 19(13), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.13.15
MoreyR. D.RouderJ. N. (2024). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs [Computer software manual]. R package version 0.9.12-4.7 https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.BayesFactor
32.
MoriM.SushidaT.KondoS. (in press). Spatial properties of scintillating grid illusion through visual experiments and numerical simulations.Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2025.108560
33.
NewJ. J.SchollB. J. (2018). Motion-induced blindness for dynamic targets: Further explorations of the perceptual scotoma hypothesis. Journal of Vision, 18(9), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.9.24
34.
NinioJ.StevensK. A. (2000). Variations on the Hermann grid: An extinction illusion. Perception, 29(10), 1209–1217. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2985
OlettoC. M.ContemoriG.BertaminiM.BattagliniL. (2023). The role of foveal cortex in discriminating peripheral stimuli: The sketchpad hypothesis. NeuroSci, 4(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci4010002
37.
OttenM.PintoY.PaffenC. L. E.SethA. K.KanaiR. (2017). The uniformity illusion: Central stimuli can determine peripheral perception. Psychological Science, 28(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616672270
PeirceJ.GrayJ. R.SimpsonS.MacAskillM.HöchenbergerR.SogoH.KastmanE.LindeløvJ. K. (2019). Psychopy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
40.
PortengenB. L.RoelofzenC.PorroG. L.ImhofS. M.FracassoA.NaberM. (2021). Blind spot and visual field anisotropy detection with flicker pupil perimetry across brightness and task variations. Vision Research, 178, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2020.10.005
41.
ProudlockF. A.KhannaA.GottlobI. (2006). Filling-in along horizontal and vertical meridians. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 47(1), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0255
42.
QianK.KawabeT.YamadaY.MiuraK. (2012). The role of orientation processing in the scintillating grid illusion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1020–1032. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0295-y
43.
QianK.MitsudoH. (2016). Eggs illusion: Local shape deformation generated by a grid pattern. Journal of Vision, 16(15), Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.15.27
44.
QianK.MitsudoH. (2020). Spatial dynamics of the eggs illusion: Visual field anisotropy and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 177, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2020.08.008
45.
QianK.YamadaY.KawabeT.MiuraK. (2009). The scintillating grid illusion: Influence of size, shape, and orientation of the luminance patches. Perception, 38(8), 1172–1182. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5943
46.
RamachandranV. S.GregoryR. L. (1991). Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision. Nature, 350, 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1038/350699a0
47.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
48.
ReadJ. C.RobsonJ. H.SmithC. L.LucasA. D. (2012). The scintillating grid illusion is enhanced by binocular viewing. i-Perception, 3, 820–830. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0546
49.
RodieckR. W. (1965). Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vision Research, 5(12), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(65)90033-7
50.
RychkovaS. I.SandimirovR. I. (2023). Investigation of the scintillating grid illusion in patients with amblyopia. Human Physiology, 49(4), 428–434. https://doi.org/10.1134/S036211972370038X
SchraufM.WistE. R.EhrensteinW. H. (2000). The scintillating grid illusion during smooth pursuit, stimulus motion, and brief exposure in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 284(1–2), 126–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(00)00999-X
56.
SpillmannL.LevineJ. (1971). Contrast enhancement in a Hermann grid with variable figure-ground ratio. Experimental Brain Research, 13, 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00234285
57.
StewartE. E.ValsecchiM.SchützA. C. (2020). A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision. Journal of Vision, 20(12), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.20.12.2
58.
SuzukiM.NodaR.TakahashiK. (2024). Motion-induced blindness occurs with a simple motion mask. Journal of Illusion, 4, Article 9623. https://doi.org/10.47691/joi.v4.9623
59.
TongJ.KhouV.TrinhM.Alonso-CaneiroD.ZangerlB.KalloniatisM. (2022). Derivation of human retinal cell densities using high-density, spatially localized optical coherence tomography data from the human retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 531(11), 1108–1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.25483
ZhaopingL. (2019). A new framework for understanding vision from the perspective of the primary visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 58, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2019.06.001
64.
ZhaopingL. (2023). Peripheral and central sensation: Multisensory orienting and recognition across species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27(6), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.03.001
