Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the perception of loudness in response to changes in fundamental frequency (F0) in spoken sounds, as well as the influence of linguistic background on this perceptual process. The results revealed that participants perceived changes in F0 to have accompanying changes in loudness, with a trend of lower F0 sounds being perceived as louder than higher F0 sounds. This finding contrasts with previous studies on pure tones, where increases in frequency typically led to increases in loudness. Furthermore, the study examined differences between two distinct groups of participants: Chinese-speaking and English-speaking individuals. It was observed that English-speaking participants exhibited a greater sensitivity to minor intensity changes compared to Chinese-speaking participants. This discrepancy in sensitivity suggests that linguistic background may play a significant role in shaping the perception of loudness in spoken sound. The study's findings contribute to our understanding of how F0 variations are perceived in terms of loudness, and highlight the potential impact of language experience on this perceptual process.

Keywords

loudness linguistic background spoken sound pitch tone language stress intensity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arsikere

Shriberg

Ozertem

(2015). “Enhanced end-of-turn detection for speech to a personal assistant.” 2015 AAAI Spring symposium series.

Baines

R. J.

Langelaan

de Bruijne

M. C.

Asscheman

Spreeuwenberg

van de Steeg

Siemerink

K. M.

van Rosse

Broekens

Wagner

(2013). Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: A longitudinal retrospective patient record review study. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22, 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001126

Bates

Maechler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Boersma

Weenink

(2019). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program] (Version 6.0.52). Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/

Fletcher

(1972). Speech and hearing in communication. Robert E. Krieger.

Fletcher

Munson

W. A.

(1933). Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. Bell System Technical Journal, 12, 377–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1933.tb00403.x

Gramming

Sundberg

Ternström

Leanderson

Perkins

W. H.

(1988). Relationship between changes in voice pitch and loudness. Journal of Voice, 2, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(88)80067-5

Hellström

. (1985). The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.35

Honorof

D. N.

Whalen

D. H.

(2005). Perception of pitch location within a speaker’s F0 range. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 2193–2200. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1841751

10.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H.

(2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

11.

Ladd

D. R.

(1984). Declination.: A review and some hypotheses. Phonology, 1, 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000294

12.

Lehiste

Fox

R. A.

(1992). Perception of prominence by Estonia and English listeners. Language and Speech, 35, 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099203500403

13.

Tang

Chang

E. F.

(2021). Human cortical encoding of pitch in tonal and non-tonal languages. Nature Communications, 12, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21430-x

14.

Lockhead

(1992). Psychophysical scaling: Judgments of attributes or objects? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00069934

15.

Long

(2014). Human perception and reaction to sound. In Architectural acoustics. Vol. 3 (pp. 81–127). Academic.

16.

Lyn-Cook

Halm

E. A.

Wisnivesky

J. P.

(2007). Determinants of adherence to influenza vaccination among inner-city adults with persistent asthma. Primary Care Respiratory Journal, 16, 229–235. https://doi.org/10.3132/pcrj.2007.00056

17.

Moore

B. C.

(2013). An introduction to the psychology of hearing (6th ed.). Brill.

18.

Neuhoff

J. G.

McBeath

M. K.

Wanzie

W. C.

(1999). Dynamic frequency change influences loudness perception: A central, analytic process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1050–1059. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1050

19.

R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/

20.

Rose

(1987). Considerations in the normalisation of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. Speech Communication, 6, 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(87)90009-4

21.

Scharine

A. A.

McBeath

M. K.

(2018). Natural regularity of correlated acoustic frequency and intensity in music and speech: Auditory scene analysis mechanisms account for integrality of pitch and loudness. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 1, 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2019.1600935

22.

Simpson

A. P.

(2009). Phonetic differences between male and female speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00125.x

23.

Sofianou

Martynenko

Wolf

M. S.

Wisnivesky

J. P.

Krauskopf

Wilson

E. A.

Goel

M. S.

Leventhal

Halm

E. A.

Federman

A. D.

(2013). Asthma beliefs are associated with medication adherence in older asthmatics. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2160-z

24.

Suzuki

Takeshima

(2004). Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 918–933. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1763601

25.

Watson

P. J.

Hughes

(2006). The relationship of vocal loudness manipulation to prosodic F0 and durational variables in healthy adults. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49(3), 1092–4388.

26.

Yanagisawa

Mikami

(2015). How does expectation change perception? A simulation model of expectation effect. In DS 80-9 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15) Vol 9: User-Centred Design, Design of Socio-Technical systems, Milan, Italy, 27-30.07. 15 (pp. 149–158).

27.

Andruski

J. E.

(2010). A cross-language study of perception of lexical stress in English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9142-2

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.04 MB

Effects of fundamental frequency changes on spoken sound loudness

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material