Body odors convey information about the individuals, but the mechanisms are not fully understood yet. As far as human reproduction is concerned, molecules that are produced in sexually dimorphic amounts could be possible chemosignals. 3-hydroxy-3-methylhexanoic acid (HMHA) is one of them—more typical of men. Here, we investigated the possibility that the perception of gender and attractiveness in human faces could be implicitly influenced by this compound. Clearly feminine, ambiguous and clearly masculine faces were primed with an odor of HMHA, a control odor or air. Based on 100-ms face presentation, 40 raters had to identify the face's gender as quickly as possible and provide attractiveness evaluations. 3-hydroxy-3-methylhexanoic acid tended to be perceived as less pleasant and induced lower sniff duration in women compared with men. As to the effects of HMHA on face perception (vs. control conditions), we found that gender identification and the associated response time were unaffected by HMHA. Attractiveness of the faces, however, increased in presence of HMHA, but not in a sex-specific manner and only for unattractive faces with ambiguous gender. In sum, this study found no evidence in favor of a possible role of this sexually dimorphic compound in intrasexual competition nor in intersexual attraction.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
2.
BurkeS. M.VeltmanD. J.GerberJ.HummelT.BakkerJ. (2012). Heterosexual men and women both show a hypothalamic response to the chemo-signal androstadienone. PLoS One, 7, e40993. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040993
3.
CurranA. M.RabinS. I.PradaP. A.FurtonK. G., et al. (2006). On the definition and measurement of human scent: Response by Curran et al. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 32, 1617–1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-006-9096-x
4.
DamonF.MezraiN.MagnierL.LeleuA.DurandK.SchaalB. (2021). Olfaction in the multisensory processing of faces: A narrative review of the influence of human body odors. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 4366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750944
5.
DarwinC. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.
6.
de GrootJ. H. B.KirkP. A.GottfriedJ. A. (2021). Titrating the smell of fear: Initial evidence for dose-invariant behavioral, physiological, and neural responses. Psychological Science, 32, 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620970548
7.
de GrootJ. H. B.SeminG. R.SmeetsM. A. M. (2017). On the communicative function of body odors: A theoretical integration and review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616676599
8.
de GrootJ. H. B.SmeetsM. A. M.RowsonM. J.BulsingP. J.BlonkC. G.WilkinsonJ. E.SeminG. R. (2015). A sniff of happiness. Psychological Science, 26, 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614566318
DotyR. L.FordM.PretiG.HugginsG. R. (1975). Changes in the intensity and pleasantness of human vaginal odors during the menstrual cycle. Science, 190, 1316–1318. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239080
11.
DotyR. L.GreenP. A.RamC.YankellS. L. (1982). Communication of gender from human breath odors: Relationship to perceived intensity and pleasantness. Hormones and Behavior, 16, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(82)90002-2
12.
DotyR. L.OrndorffM. M.LeydenJ.KligmanA. (1978). Communication of gender from human axillary odors: Relationship to perceived intensity and hedonicity. Behavioral Biology, 23, 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6773(78)91393-7
13.
DoucetS.SoussignanR.SagotP.SchaalB. (2012). An overlooked aspect of the human breast: Areolar glands in relation with breastfeeding pattern, neonatal weight gain, and the dynamics of lactation. Early Human Development, 88, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.07.020
14.
FerdenziC.DelplanqueS.AtanassovaR.SanderD. (2016a). Androstadienone’s influence on the perception of facial and vocal attractiveness is not sex specific. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 66, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.01.016
15.
FerdenziC.DelplanqueS.Mehu-BlantarI.Da Paz CabralK. M.Domingos FelicioM.SanderD. (2015a). The Geneva Faces and Voices (GEFAV) database. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1110–1121. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0545-0
16.
FerdenziC.FournelA.ThévenetM.CoppinG.BensafiM. (2015b). Viewing olfactory affective responses through the sniff prism: Effect of perceptual dimensions and age on olfactomotor responses to odors. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01776
17.
FerdenziC.RazafindrazakaH.BaldoviniN.PouponD.PierronD.BensafiM. (2019). Influence of gender and culture on the perception of acidic compounds of human body odor. Physiology & Behavior, 210, 112561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112561
18.
FerdenziC.Richard OrtegónS.DelplanqueS.BaldoviniN.BensafiM. (2020). Interdisciplinary challenges for elucidating human olfactory attractiveness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375, 20190268. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0268
19.
FerdenziC.RoubyC.BensafiM. (2016b). The social nose: Importance of olfactory perception in group dynamics and relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 27, 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1215207
20.
FerdenziC.SchaalB.RobertsS. C. (2009). Human axillary odor: Are there side-related perceptual differences?Chemical Senses, 34, 565–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjp037
21.
GildersleeveK.HaseltonM. G.FalesM. R. (2014a). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1205–1259. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438
22.
GildersleeveK.HaseltonM. G.FalesM. R. (2014b). Meta-analyses and p-curves support robust cycle shifts in women’s mate preferences: Reply to Wood and Carden (2014) and Harris, Pashler, and Mickes (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1272–1280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037714
23.
GowerD. B.BirdS.SharmaP.HouseF. R. (1985). Axillary 5 alpha-androst-16-en-3-one in men and women: Relationships with olfactory acuity to odorous 16-androstenes. Experientia, 41, 1134–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01951694
24.
HareR. M.SchlatterS.RhodesG.SimmonsL. W. (2017). Putative sex-specific human pheromones do not affect gender perception, attractiveness ratings or unfaithfulness judgements of opposite sex faces. Royal Society Open Science, 4, 160831. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160831
25.
HarrisC. R.PashlerH.MickesL. (2014). Elastic analysis procedures: An incurable (but preventable) problem in the fertility effect literature. Comment on Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1260–1264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036478
26.
HavlicekJ.RobertsS. C.FlegrJ. (2005). Women’s preference for dominant male odour: Effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters, 1, 256–259. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0332
27.
HerzR. S.InzlichtM. (2002). Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection. The importance of smell for women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(02)00095-8
28.
HummelT.KroneF.LundströmJ. N.BartschO. (2005). Androstadienone odor thresholds in adolescents. Hormones and Behavior, 47, 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.10.007
29.
HummerT. A.McClintockM. K. (2009). Putative human pheromone androstadienone attunes the mind specifically to emotional information. Hormones and Behavior, 55, 548–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.01.002
30.
HuovialaP.RantalaM. J. (2013). A putative human pheromone, androstadienone, increases cooperation between men. PLoS One, 8, e62499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062499
JonesB. C.DeBruineL. M.PerrettD. I.LittleA. C.FeinbergD. R.Law SmithM. J. (2008). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9268-y
33.
Kirk-SmithM.BoothD. A.CarrollD.DaviesP. (1978). Human social attitudes affected by androstenol. Research Communications in Psychology,Psychiatry and Behavior, 3, 379–384.
34.
KovácsG.GulyasB.SavicI.PerrettD. I.CornwellR. E.LittleA. C.JonesB. C.BurtD. M.GalV.VidnyanszkyZ. (2004). Smelling human sex hormone-like compounds affects face gender judgment of men. Neuroreport, 15, 1275–1277. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000130234.51411.0e
35.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
LeydenJ. J.McGinleyK. J.HolzleE.LabowsJ. N.KligmanA. M. (1981). The microbiology of the human axilla and its relationship to axillary odor. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 77, 413–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12494624
LübkeK. T.PauseB. M. (2015). Always follow your nose: The functional significance of social chemosignals in human reproduction and survival. Hormones and Behavior, 68, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.10.001
LundströmJ. N.OlssonM. J. (2005). Subthreshold amounts of social odorant affect mood, but not behavior, in heterosexual women when tested by a male, but not a female, experimenter. Biological Psychology, 70, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.01.008
42.
MitroS.GordonA. R.OlssonM. J.LundströmJ. N. (2012). The smell of age: Perception and discrimination of body odors of different ages. PLoS One, 7, e38110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038110
43.
Mujica-ParodiL. R.StreyH. H.FrederickB.SavoyR.CoxD.BotanovY.TolkunovD.RubinD.WeberJ. (2009). Chemosensory cues to conspecific emotional stress activate amygdala in humans. PLoS One, 4, e6415. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006415
44.
NatschA.DerrerS.FlachsmannF.SchmidJ. (2006). A broad diversity of volatile carboxylic acids, released by a bacterial aminoacylase from axilla secretions, as candidate molecules for the determination of human-body odor type. Chemistry & Biodiversity, 3, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.200690015
45.
NatschA.GfellerH.GygaxP.SchmidJ.AcunaG. (2003). A specific bacterial aminoacylase cleaves odorant precursors secreted in the human axilla. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278, 5718–5727. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M210142200
46.
OlssonM. J.LundströmJ. N.KimballB. A.GordonA. R.KarshikoffB.HosseiniN.SorjonenK.HöglundC. O.SolaresC.SoopA.AxelssonJ.LekanderM. (2014). The scent of disease: Human body odor contains an early chemosensory cue of sickness. Psychological Science, 25, 817–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613515681
47.
ParmaV.TirindelliR.BisazzaA.MassaccesiS.CastielloU. (2012). Subliminally perceived odours modulate female intrasexual competition: An eye movement study. PLoS One, 7, e30645. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030645
48.
PauseB. M.LübkeK.LaudienJ. H.FerstlR. (2010). Intensified neuronal investment in the processing of chemosensory anxiety signals in non-socially anxious and socially anxious individuals. PLoS One, 5, e10342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010342
49.
PennD. J.OberzaucherE.GrammerK.FischerG.SoiniH. A.WieslerD.NovotnyM. V.DixonS. J.XuY.BreretonR. G. (2007). Individual and gender fingerprints in human body odour. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 4, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.0182
50.
PerrottaV.GraffeoM.BoniniN.GottfriedJ. A. (2016). The putative chemosignal androstadienone makes women more generous. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 9, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000055
51.
PrescottJ.BurnsJ.FrankR. A. (2010). Influence of odor hedonics, food-relatedness, and motivational state on human sniffing. Chemosensory Perception, 3, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-010-9073-1
52.
PretiG.WillseA.LabowsJ. N.LeydenJ. J.WahlJ.KwakJ., et al. (2006). On the definition and measurement of human scent: Comments on Curran et al. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 32, 1613–1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-006-9095-y
R Core Team (2018). R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
55.
RekowD.BaudouinJ.-Y.DurandK.LeleuA. (2022). Smell what you hardly see: Odors assist visual categorization in the human brain. Neuroimage, 255, 119181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119181
56.
Richard OrtegónS.FournelA.CarlosO.Kawabata DuncanK.HirabayashiK.TagaiK.AbriatA.BensafiM.RaceB.FerdenziC. (2022). And I’m feeling good: Effect of emotional sweat and perfume on others’ physiology, verbal responses, and creativity. Chemical Senses, 47, bjac012.https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjac012
57.
RikowskiA.GrammerK. (1999). Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266, 869–874. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0717
58.
RobertsS. C.GoslingL. M.CarterV.PetrieM. (2008). MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2715–2722. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0825
59.
RochaM.ParmaV.LundstroemJ. N.SoaresS. C. (2018). Anxiety body odors as context for dynamic faces: Categorization and psychophysiological biases. Perception, 47, 1054–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006618797227
SezilleC.MessaoudiB.BertrandA.JoussainP.ThévenetM.BensafiM. (2013). A portable experimental apparatus for human olfactory fMRI experiments. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 218, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.04.021
62.
SinghD.BronstadP. M. (2001). Female body odour is a potential cue to ovulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268, 797–801. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1589
StevensonR. J.RepacholiB. M. (2003). Age-related changes in children’s hedonic response to male body odor. Developmental Psychology, 39, 670–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.4.670
65.
TiddemanB. P.BurtD. M.PerrettD. I. (2001). Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.946630
66.
TognettiA.DurandV.DuboisD.Barkat-DefradasM.HopfensitzA.FerdenziC. (2022). The smell of cooperativeness: Do human body odours advertise cooperative behaviours?British Journal of Psychology, 113, 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12544
67.
TroccazM.BorchardG.VuilleumierC.Raviot-DerrienS.NiclassY.BeccucciS.StarkenmannC. (2009). Gender-specific differences between the concentrations of nonvolatile (R)/(S)-3-methyl-3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol and (R)/(S)-3-hydroxy-3-methyl-hexanoic acid odor precursors in axillary secretions. Chemical Senses, 34, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjn076
68.
WincenciakJ.DzhelyovaM.PerrettD. I.BarracloughN. E. (2013). Adaptation to facial trustworthiness is different in female and male observers. Vision Research, 87, 30–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.05.007
69.
WoodW.CardenL. (2014). Elusiveness of menstrual cycle effects on mate preferences: Comment on Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014). Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1265–1271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036722
70.
WoodW.KresselL.JoshiP. D.LouieB. (2014). Meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects on women’s mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6, 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914523073
71.
WyattT. D. (2015). The search for human pheromones: The lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20142994. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
