We tested to see how Ruben’s copy of “The Battle of Anghiari” by Leonardo da Vinci would be interpreted by AI in a neuroanatomical aspect. We used WOMBO Dream, an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm that creates images based on words and figures. The keyword we provided for the algorithm was “brain” and the reference image was Ruben’s drawing. AI interpreted the whole drawing as a representation of the brain. The image generated by the algorithm was similar to our interpretation of the same painting.
AshfordJ. W.TatemS. B. (2022). Michelangelo’s presentations in the Sistine Chapel: Brain evolution and the relationship of the brain to specific cognitive functions. The Neuroscientist. Nov 19. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/10738584221136091
2.
ChamberlainR.MullinC.ScheerlinkB.WagemansJ. (2018). Putting the art in artificial: Aesthetic responses to computer-generated art. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 12(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000136
3.
FingerS. (2000). Minds behind the brain: A history of the pioneers and their discoveries. Oxford University Press.
4.
GangadharbatlaH. (2022). The role of AI attribution knowledge in the evaluation of artwork. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 40(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237421994697
5.
KeshelavaG. (2021). Cardiac anatomy in the ‘Dreyfus Madonna’ by Leonardo da Vinci. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 34(4), 582–584. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaa314
6.
KeshelavaG. (2022). Hidden brain anatomy in Peter Paul Rubens’s copy of “The Batlle of Anghiari” by Leonardo da Vinci: “The Battle of Anghiari” and brain anatomy. The Neuroscientist, Apr 22. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/10738584221094748
7.
MacphersonT.ChurchlandA.SejnowskiT.DiCarloJ.KamitaniY.TakahashiH.HikidaT. (2012). Natural and artificial intelligence: A brief introduction to the interplay between AI and neuroscience research. Neural Networks, 144, 603–6013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2021.09.018
8.
MeshbergerF. L. (1990). An interpretation of Michelangelo’s Creation of Adam based on neuroanatomy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264(14), 1837–1841. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03450140059034
9.
MoffatD. C.KellyM. (2006). An investigation into people’s bias against computational creativity in music composition. In: Proceedings of the third joint workshop on Computational Creativity (as part of ECAI 2006), Rivia del Garda, Italy.
10.
PaluzziA.BelliA.BainP.VivaL. (2007). Brain ‘imaging’ in the Renaissance. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100, 540–543. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.100.12.540
11.
SavastanoL. E.MorrealeR. F.EliasophP. I.Forcht-DagiT.NijensohnD. E. (2022). The “Michelangelo Code”: the quest for universal truth. The Neuroscientist, Jul 22. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/10738584221096642
